Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Veeranjaneyulu Sadhanala

dblp:81/7249 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Mathematical optimization · 91% Information theory · 9%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 90% Learning theory · 10%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 100%

Topics — the 16 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation
0.812024
USTAD: Unified Single-model Training Achieving Diverse Scores for Information Retrieval · ICML 2024
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval › dense retrieval
bi-encoder retrieval
0.812024
USTAD: Unified Single-model Training Achieving Diverse Scores for Information Retrieval · ICML 2024
Information retrieval › reranking
cross-encoder reranking
0.812024
USTAD: Unified Single-model Training Achieving Diverse Scores for Information Retrieval · ICML 2024
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
dense retrieval
0.812024
USTAD: Unified Single-model Training Achieving Diverse Scores for Information Retrieval · ICML 2024
Information retrieval
ranking
0.812024
USTAD: Unified Single-model Training Achieving Diverse Scores for Information Retrieval · ICML 2024
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.812024
USTAD: Unified Single-model Training Achieving Diverse Scores for Information Retrieval · ICML 2024
Mathematical optimization › regularization › convex regularization
total variation regularization
0.312017
Higher-Order Total Variation Classes on Grids: Minimax Theory and Trend Filtering Methods · NIPS 2017
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computing › parallel optimization
asynchronous parallel optimization
0.212016
Parallel and Distributed Block-Coordinate Frank-Wolfe Algorithms · ICML 2016
Mathematical optimization › frank-wolfe algorithm
block-coordinate frank-wolfe
0.212016
Parallel and Distributed Block-Coordinate Frank-Wolfe Algorithms · ICML 2016
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.212016
Total Variation Classes Beyond 1d: Minimax Rates, and the Limitations of Linear Smoothers · NIPS 2016
Mathematical optimization
frank-wolfe algorithm
0.212016
Parallel and Distributed Block-Coordinate Frank-Wolfe Algorithms · ICML 2016
Mathematical optimization
parallel and distributed optimization
0.212016
Parallel and Distributed Block-Coordinate Frank-Wolfe Algorithms · ICML 2016
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
total variation denoising
0.212016
Total Variation Classes Beyond 1d: Minimax Rates, and the Limitations of Linear Smoothers · NIPS 2016
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation
minimax estimation
0.112017
Higher-Order Total Variation Classes on Grids: Minimax Theory and Trend Filtering Methods · NIPS 2017
Information theory › estimation theory › minimax estimation
minimax rate
0.112016
Total Variation Classes Beyond 1d: Minimax Rates, and the Limitations of Linear Smoothers · NIPS 2016
Information theory
sobolev spaces
0.112016
Total Variation Classes Beyond 1d: Minimax Rates, and the Limitations of Linear Smoothers · NIPS 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

knowledge distillation · 1.5embedding matching · 1.5trend filtering · 0.6mini-batching · 0.5block-separable constraints · 0.5asynchronous computation · 0.5minimax lower bounds · 0.3minimax lower bound · 0.3total variation denoising · 0.2minimax analysis · 0.2laplacian smoothing · 0.2laplacian eigenmaps · 0.2fused lasso · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 USTAD: Unified Single-model Training Achieving Diverse Scores for Information Retrieval
abstract
Modern information retrieval (IR) systems consists of multiple stages like retrieval and ranking, with Transformer-based models achieving state-of-the-art performance at each stage. In this paper, we challenge the tradition of using separate models for different stages and ask if a single Transformer encoder can provide relevance score needed in each stage. We present USTAD – a new unified approach to train a single network that can provide powerful ranking scores as a cross-encoder (CE) model as well as factorized embeddings for large-scale retrieval as a dual-encoder (DE) model. Empirically, we find a single USTAD model to be competitive to separate ranking CE and retrieval DE models. Furthermore, USTAD combines well with a novel embedding matching-based distillation, significantly improving CE to DE distillation. It further motivates novel asymmetric architectures for student models to ensure a better embedding alignment between the student and the teacher while ensuring small online inference cost. On standard benchmarks like MSMARCO, we demonstrate that USTAD with our proposed distillation method leads to asymmetric students with only 1/10th trainable parameter but retaining 95-97% of the teacher performance.
Seungyeon Kim 0001, Ankit Singh Rawat, Manzil Zaheer, Wittawat Jitkrittum, Veeranjaneyulu Sadhanala, Sadeep Jayasumana, Aditya Krishna Menon, Rob Fergus, Sanjiv Kumar
ICML5
2019 A Higher-Order Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
abstract
We present an extension of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) two-sample test, which can be more sensitive to differences in the tails. Our test statistic is an integral probability metric (IPM) defined over a higher-order total variation ball, recovering the original KS test as its simplest case. We give an exact representer result for our IPM, which generalizes the fact that the original KS test statistic can be expressed in equivalent variational and CDF forms. For small enough orders $(k \le 5)$, we develop a linear-time algorithm for computing our higher-order KS test statistic; for all others $(k \ge 6)$, we give a nearly linear-time approximation. We derive the asymptotic null distribution for our test, and show that our nearly linear-time approximation shares the same asymptotic null. Lastly, we complement our theory with numerical studies.
Veeranjaneyulu Sadhanala, Yu-Xiang Wang 0003, Aaditya Ramdas, Ryan J. Tibshirani
AISTATS1
2017 Higher-Order Total Variation Classes on Grids: Minimax Theory and Trend Filtering Methods
abstract
We consider the problem of estimating the values of a function over $n$ nodes of a $d$-dimensional grid graph (having equal side lengths $n^{1/d}$) from noisy observations. The function is assumed to be smooth, but is allowed to exhibit different amounts of smoothness at different regions in the grid. Such heterogeneity eludes classical measures of smoothness from nonparametric statistics, such as Holder smoothness. Meanwhile, total variation (TV) smoothness classes allow for heterogeneity, but are restrictive in another sense: only constant functions count as perfectly smooth (achieve zero TV). To move past this, we define two new higher-order TV classes, based on two ways of compiling the discrete derivatives of a parameter across the nodes. We relate these two new classes to Holder classes, and derive lower bounds on their minimax errors. We also analyze two naturally associated trend filtering methods; when $d=2$, each is seen to be rate optimal over the appropriate class.
Veeranjaneyulu Sadhanala, Yu-Xiang Wang 0003, James Sharpnack, Ryan J. Tibshirani
NIPS1
2016 Graph Sparsification Approaches for Laplacian Smoothing
abstract
Given a statistical estimation problem where regularization is performed according to the structure of a large, dense graph G, we consider fitting the statistical estimate using a \it sparsified surrogate graph \mathbfG, which shares the vertices of G but has far fewer edges, and is thus more tractable to work with computationally. We examine three types of sparsification: spectral sparsification, which can be seen as the result of sampling edges from the graph with probabilities proportional to their effective resistances, and two simpler sparsifiers, which sample edges uniformly from the graph, either globally or locally. We provide strong theoretical and experimental results, demonstrating that sparsification before estimation can give statistically sensible solutions, with significant computational savings.
Veeranjaneyulu Sadhanala, Yu-Xiang Wang 0003, Ryan J. Tibshirani
AISTATS1
2016 Parallel and Distributed Block-Coordinate Frank-Wolfe Algorithms
abstract
We study parallel and distributed Frank-Wolfe algorithms; the former on shared memory machines with mini-batching, and the latter in a delayed update framework. In both cases, we perform computations asynchronously whenever possible. We assume block-separable constraints as in Block-Coordinate Frank-Wolfe (BCFW) method (Lacoste et. al., 2013) , but our analysis subsumes BCFW and reveals problem-dependent quantities that govern the speedups of our methods over BCFW. A notable feature of our algorithms is that they do not depend on worst-case bounded delays, but only (mildly) on **expected** delays, making them robust to stragglers and faulty worker threads. We present experiments on structural SVM and Group Fused Lasso, and observe significant speedups over competing state-of-the-art (and synchronous) methods.
Yu-Xiang Wang 0003, Veeranjaneyulu Sadhanala, Wei Dai 0003, Willie Neiswanger, Suvrit Sra, Eric P. Xing
ICML2
2016 Total Variation Classes Beyond 1d: Minimax Rates, and the Limitations of Linear Smoothers
abstract
We consider the problem of estimating a function defined over $n$ locations on a $d$-dimensional grid (having all side lengths equal to $n^{1/d}$). When the function is constrained to have discrete total variation bounded by $C_n$, we derive the minimax optimal (squared) $\ell_2$ estimation error rate, parametrized by $n, C_n$. Total variation denoising, also known as the fused lasso, is seen to be rate optimal. Several simpler estimators exist, such as Laplacian smoothing and Laplacian eigenmaps. A natural question is: can these simpler estimators perform just as well? We prove that these estimators, and more broadly all estimators given by linear transformations of the input data, are suboptimal over the class of functions with bounded variation. This extends fundamental findings of Donoho and Johnstone (1998) on 1-dimensional total variation spaces to higher dimensions. The implication is that the computationally simpler methods cannot be used for such sophisticated denoising tasks, without sacrificing statistical accuracy. We also derive minimax rates for discrete Sobolev spaces over $d$-dimensional grids, which are, in some sense, smaller than the total variation function spaces. Indeed, these are small enough spaces that linear estimators can be optimal---and a few well-known ones are, such as Laplacian smoothing and Laplacian eigenmaps, as we show. Lastly, we investigate the adaptivity of the total variation denoiser to these smaller Sobolev function spaces.
Veeranjaneyulu Sadhanala, Yu-Xiang Wang 0003, Ryan J. Tibshirani
NIPS1