Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Min Li 0049

dblp:82/0-49 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0003-4732-6457ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Computational photography and imaging · 50% Geometric modeling and processing · 25% Rendering · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Geometric modeling and processing
3d reconstruction
0.412020
Multi-View Photometric Stereo: A Robust Solution and Benchmark Dataset for Spatially Varying Isotropic Materials · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2020
Computational photography and imaging › photometric stereo
multi-view photometric stereo
0.412020
Multi-View Photometric Stereo: A Robust Solution and Benchmark Dataset for Spatially Varying Isotropic Materials · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2020
Computational photography and imaging
photometric stereo
0.412020
Multi-View Photometric Stereo: A Robust Solution and Benchmark Dataset for Spatially Varying Isotropic Materials · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2020
Rendering › appearance acquisition
shape and reflectance capture
0.412020
Multi-View Photometric Stereo: A Robust Solution and Benchmark Dataset for Spatially Varying Isotropic Materials · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

structure from motion · 0.4BRDF estimation · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 A non-Lambertian photometric stereo under perspective projection
abstract
Under the perspective projection assumption, non-Lambertian photometric stereo is a highly non-linear problem. In this study, we present an optimized framework for reconstructing the surface normal and depth with non-Lambertian reflection models under perspective projection. By decomposing the images into diffuse and specular components, we compute the surface normal and reflectance simultaneously. We also propose a variational formulation that is robust and useful for surface reconstruction. The experiments show that our method accurately reconstructs both the surface shape and reflectance of colorful objects with non-Lambertian surfaces.
Min Li 0049, Changyu Diao, Duanqing Xu, Wei Xing 0001, Dongming Lu
Frontiers Inf. Technol. Electron. Eng.1
2020 Multi-View Photometric Stereo: A Robust Solution and Benchmark Dataset for Spatially Varying Isotropic Materials
abstract
We present a method to capture both 3D shape and spatially varying reflectance with a multi-view photometric stereo (MVPS) technique that works for general isotropic materials. Our algorithm is suitable for perspective cameras and nearby point light sources. Our data capture setup is simple, which consists of only a digital camera, some LED lights, and an optional automatic turntable. From a single viewpoint, we use a set of photometric stereo images to identify surface points with the same distance to the camera. We collect this information from multiple viewpoints and combine it with structure-from-motion to obtain a precise reconstruction of the complete 3D shape. The spatially varying isotropic bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) is captured by simultaneously inferring a set of basis BRDFs and their mixing weights at each surface point. In experiments, we demonstrate our algorithm with two different setups: a studio setup for highest precision and a desktop setup for best usability. According to our experiments, under the studio setting, the captured shapes are accurate to 0.5 millimeters and the captured reflectance has a relative root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 9%. We also quantitatively evaluate state-of-the-art MVPS on a newly collected benchmark dataset, which is publicly available for inspiring future research.
Min Li 0049, Zhenglong Zhou, Boxin Shi, Changyu Diao, Ping Tan 0002
IEEE Trans. Image Process.1