EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrew Liau
dblp:82/10675
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Coding theory · 100% | |
| Computer networks
2 papers |
Internet architecture and protocols · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Internet architecture and protocols
network coding |
0.3 | 2 | 2013 | Improved Low-Complexity Soliton-Like Network Coding for a Resource-Limited Relay · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2013 Binary Soliton-Like Rateless Coding for the Y-Network · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2011 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › rateless codes
fountain codes |
0.3 | 2 | 2013 | Improved Low-Complexity Soliton-Like Network Coding for a Resource-Limited Relay · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2013 Binary Soliton-Like Rateless Coding for the Y-Network · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2011 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
rateless codes |
0.3 | 2 | 2013 | Improved Low-Complexity Soliton-Like Network Coding for a Resource-Limited Relay · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2013 Binary Soliton-Like Rateless Coding for the Y-Network · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
degree distribution shaping · 0.3asymptotic error analysis · 0.3degree distribution design · 0.2belief propagation decoding · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Improved Low-Complexity Soliton-Like Network Coding for a Resource-Limited RelayabstractIn this paper, we examine the marriage of Fountain coding and network coding (NC). Fountain codes are capacity achieving erasure codes designed for point-to-point transmissions. NC is a throughput-optimal data dissemination technique, but its high-complexity decoding makes it unattractive for applications where limited resources are available. In this paper, we consider Fountain network coding to take advantage of efficient fountain decoders. Protocols such as Soliton-like rateless coding (SLRC) have previously addressed this issue, yet the re-encoding at the relay is expensive while there is still room for improving the performance. Extending SLRC, we propose the Improved Soliton-like Rateless Coding (ISLRC) protocol, where the relay is designed to perform distribution shaping given limited resources. ISLRC preserves the same properties as SLRC, but also makes the aggregate degree distribution more efficient for Fountain decoding. We analyze ISLRC's degree distribution and perform an asymptotic error analysis for the case where resources are most scarce. The ISLRC scheme is compared against other existing schemes. Simulation results show that even under the worst-case scenario of ISLRC, better performance can be achieved compared to SLRC and other existing schemes. Andrew Liau, Il-Min Kim 0001, Shahram Yousefi |
IEEE Trans. Commun. | 1 |
| 2011 | Binary Soliton-Like Rateless Coding for the Y-NetworkabstractFor the binary erasure channel, Luby Transform (LT) and Raptors codes have been shown to achieve capacity by carefully designed degree distributions for multicasting scenarios. Generalizing fountain codes to multihop networks requires transport nodes to perform network coding (NC). However, if intermediate nodes perform decentralized NC blindly, the statistical properties imposed by the fountain code are lost, and thus, a Gaussian elimination decoder must be used at the sink at the cost of significant increase in complexity compared to a belief propagation (BP) decoder. Addressing this problem, in this paper, we propose a new protocol, namely Soliton-like rateless coding (SLRC), by exploiting the benefits of fountain coding and NC coding over a Y-network. Ensuring key properties of the fountain code are preserved; BP can be effectively applied when transport nodes perform NC. Additionally, the proposed coding protocol is resilient to nodes churn rates. The SLRC scheme is evaluated against buffer-and-forwarding, and the distributed LT (DLT) codes; SLRC exhibits a 5% reduction in overhead compared to the state of the art DLT code at high decoding success rates. Simulations show that the proposed scheme preserves the benefits of NC and fountain coding. Andrew Liau, Shahram Yousefi, Il-Min Kim 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Commun. | 1 |