EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jochen Fröhlich
dblp:82/1092
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0003-1653-5686ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Visualization and visual analytics · 67% Image and video processing · 33% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Visualization and visual analytics
flow visualization |
0.9 | 2 | 2020 | Analysis of the Near-Wall Flow in a Turbine Cascade by Splat Visualization · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2020 Detection and Visualization of Splat and Antisplat Events in Turbulent Flows · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2020 |
Image and video processing
feature detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Detection and Visualization of Splat and Antisplat Events in Turbulent Flows · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2020 |
Computational science and engineering › fluid dynamics
turbulent flow analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Detection and Visualization of Splat and Antisplat Events in Turbulent Flows · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
strain tensor analysis · 0.9splat detection · 0.9lagrangian method · 0.9direct numerical simulation · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Detection and Visualization of Splat and Antisplat Events in Turbulent FlowsabstractSplat and antisplat events are a widely found phenomenon in three-dimensional turbulent flow fields. Splats are observed when fluid locally impinges on an impermeable surface transferring energy from the normal component to the tangential velocity components, while antisplats relate to the inverted situation. These events affect a variety of flow properties, such as the transfer of kinetic energy between velocity components and the transfer of heat, so that their investigation can provide new insight into these issues. Here, we propose the first Lagrangian method for the detection of splats and antisplats as features of an unsteady flow field. Our method utilizes the concept of strain tensors on flow-embedded flat surfaces to extract disjoint regions in which splat and antisplat events of arbitrary scale occur. We validate the method with artificial flow fields of increasing complexity. Subsequently, the method is used to analyze application data stemming from a direct numerical simulation of the turbulent flow over a backward facing step. Our results show that splat and antisplat events can be identified efficiently and reliably even in such a complex situation, demonstrating that the new method constitutes a well-suited tool for the analysis of turbulent flows. Baldwin Nsonga, Martin Niemann, Jochen Fröhlich, Joachim Staib, Stefan Gumhold, Gerik Scheuermann |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 3 |
| 2020 | Analysis of the Near-Wall Flow in a Turbine Cascade by Splat VisualizationabstractTurbines are essential components of jet planes and power plants. Therefore, their efficiency and service life are of central engineering interest. In the case of jet planes or thermal power plants, the heating of the turbines due to the hot gas flow is critical. Besides effective cooling, it is a major goal of engineers to minimize heat transfer between gas flow and turbine by design. Since it is known that splat events have a substantial impact on the heat transfer between flow and immersed surfaces, we adapt a splat detection and visualization method to a turbine cascade simulation in this case study. Because splat events are small phenomena, we use a direct numerical simulation resolving the turbulence in the flow as the base of our analysis. The outcome shows promising insights into splat formation and its relation to vortex structures. This may lead to better turbine design in the future. Baldwin Nsonga, Gerik Scheuermann, Stefan Gumhold, Jordi Ventosa-Molina, Denis Koschichow, Jochen Fröhlich |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 6 |
| 2017 | Towards compositional and generative tensor optimizationsabstractMany numerical algorithms are naturally expressed as operations on tensors (i.e. multi-dimensional arrays). Hence, tensor expressions occur in a wide range of application domains, e.g. quantum chemistry and physics; big data analysis and machine learning; and computational fluid dynamics. Each domain, typically, has developed its own strategies for efficiently generating optimized code, supported by tools such as domain-specific languages, compilers, and libraries. However, strategies and tools are rarely portable between domains, and generic solutions typically act as ''black boxes'' that offer little control over code generation and optimization. As a consequence, there are application domains without adequate support for easily generating optimized code, e.g. computational fluid dynamics. In this paper we propose a generic and easily extensible intermediate language for expressing tensor computations and code transformations in a modular and generative fashion. Beyond being an intermediate language, our solution also offers meta-programming capabilities for experts in code optimization. While applications from the domain of computational fluid dynamics serve to illustrate our proposed solution, we believe that our general approach can help unify research in tensor optimizations and make solutions more portable between domains. Adilla Susungi, Norman A. Rink, Jerónimo Castrillón, Immo Huismann, Albert Cohen 0001, Claude Tadonki, Jörg Stiller, Jochen Fröhlich |
GPCE | 8 |