Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hyondeuk Kim

dblp:82/2684 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 3 · 3 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › functional verification
constrained random verification
0.112008
Application of Formal Word-Level Analysis to Constrained Random Simulation · CAV 2008
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.112008
Application of Formal Word-Level Analysis to Constrained Random Simulation · CAV 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

word-level analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Efficient Term-ITE Conversion for Satisfiability Modulo Theories
Hyondeuk Kim, Fabio Somenzi, HoonSang Jin
SAT1
2008 Application of Formal Word-Level Analysis to Constrained Random Simulation
Hyondeuk Kim, HoonSang Jin, Kavita Ravi, Petr Spacek, John Pierce, Robert P. Kurshan, Fabio Somenzi
CAV1
2007 Hybrid CEGAR: combining variable hiding and predicate abstraction
abstract
Variable hiding and predicate abstraction are two popular abstraction methods to obtain simplified models for model checking. Although both methods have been used successfully in practice, no attempt has been made to combine them in counterexample guided abstraction refinement (CEGAR). In this paper, we propose a hybrid abstraction method that allows both visible variables and predicates to take advantages of their relative strengths. We use refinement based on weakest preconditions to add new predicates, and under certain conditions trade in the predicates for visible variables in the abstract model. We also present heuristics for improving the overall performance, based on static analysis to identify useful candidates for visible variables, and use of lazy constraints to find more effective unsatisfiable cores for refinement. We have implemented the proposed hybrid CEGAR procedure. Our experiments on public benchmarks show that the new abstraction method frequently outperforms the better of the two existing abstraction methods.
Chao Wang 0001, Hyondeuk Kim, Aarti Gupta
ICCAD2
2006 Finite Instantiations for Integer Difference Logic
abstract
The last few years have seen the advent of a new breed of decision procedures for various fragments of first-order logic based on propositional abstraction. A lazy satisfiability checker for a given fragment of first-order logic invokes a theory-specific decision procedure (a theory solver) on (partial) satisfying assignments for the abstraction. If the assignment is found to be consistent in the given theory, then a model for the original formula has been found. Otherwise, a refinement of the propositional abstraction is extracted from the proof of inconsistency and the search is resumed. We describe a theory solver for integer difference logic that is effective when the formula to be decided contains equality and disequality (negated equality) constraints so that the decision problem partakes of the nature of the pigeonhole problem. We propose a reduction of the problem to propositional satisfiability by computing bounds on a sufficient subset of solutions, and present experimental evidence for the efficiency of this approach
Hyondeuk Kim, Fabio Somenzi
FMCAD1