Roddy W. Erickson

dblp:82/2828 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1983
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Network management and operations · 87% Internet architecture and protocols · 13%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Logic in computer science · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network management and operations
network verification
0.011982
Specification and Verification of Communication Protocols in AFFIRM Using State Transition Models · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1982
Network management and operations
protocol verification
0.011982
Specification and Verification of Communication Protocols in AFFIRM Using State Transition Models · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1982
Logic in computer science
specification and verification
0.011982
Specification and Verification of Communication Protocols in AFFIRM Using State Transition Models · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1982
Internet architecture and protocols
protocol specification
0.011982
Specification and Verification of Communication Protocols in AFFIRM Using State Transition Models · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1982

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

theorem proving · 0.0state transition model · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1983 Correction to "Specification and Verification of Communication Protocols in AFFIRM Using State Transition Models"
Carl A. Sunshine, David H. Thompson, Roddy W. Erickson, Susan L. Gerhart, Daniel Schwabe 0001
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.3
1982 Specification and Verification of Communication Protocols in AFFIRM Using State Transition Models
abstract
It is becoming increasingly important that communication protocols be formally specified and verified. This paper describes a particular approach–the state transition model–using a collection of mechanically supported specification and verification tools incorporated in a running system called AFFIRM. Although developed for the specification of abstract data types and the verification of their properties, the formalism embodied in AFFIRM can also express the concepts underlying state transition machines. Such models easily express most of the events occurring in protocol systems, including those of the users, their agent processes, and the communication channels. The paper reviews the basic concepts of state transition models and the AFFIRM formalism and methodology and describes their union. A detailed example, the alternating bit protocol, illustrates varous properties of interest for specification and verification. Other examples explored using this formalism are briefly described and the accumulated experience is discussed.
Carl A. Sunshine, David H. Thompson, Roddy W. Erickson, Susan L. Gerhart, Daniel Schwabe 0001
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.3
1980 The AFFIRM Theorem Prover: Proof Forests and Management of Large Proofs
Roddy W. Erickson, David R. Musser
CADE1