Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jeffrey S. Morris
dblp:82/3981
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-8520-6088ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 9 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
8 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 98% Computational science and engineering · 2% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
epigenomics |
0.8 | 2 | 2021 | Methylation-eQTL analysis in cancer research · Bioinform. 2021 Identification of differentially methylated loci using wavelet-based functional mixed models · Bioinform. 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
proteomics |
0.3 | 4 | 2008 | Pinnacle: a fast, automatic and accurate method for detecting and quantifying protein spots in 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis data · Bioinform. 2008 PrepMS: TOF MS data graphical preprocessing tool · Bioinform. 2007 Feature extraction and quantification for mass spectrometry in biomedical applications using the mean spectrum · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics › differential methylation analysis
differential methylation detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Identification of differentially methylated loci using wavelet-based functional mixed models · Bioinform. 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
biomarker discovery |
0.2 | 2 | 2013 | iBAG: integrative Bayesian analysis of high-dimensional multiplatform genomics data · Bioinform. 2013 Reproducibility of SELDI-TOF protein patterns in serum: comparing datasets from different experiments · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
mass spectrometry data analysis |
0.2 | 3 | 2007 | PrepMS: TOF MS data graphical preprocessing tool · Bioinform. 2007 Feature extraction and quantification for mass spectrometry in biomedical applications using the mean spectrum · Bioinform. 2005 Reproducibility of SELDI-TOF protein patterns in serum: comparing datasets from different experiments · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › data integration
cross-platform data integration |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | iBAG: integrative Bayesian analysis of high-dimensional multiplatform genomics data · Bioinform. 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | iBAG: integrative Bayesian analysis of high-dimensional multiplatform genomics data · Bioinform. 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics › gel-based proteomics
2d gel electrophoresis analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Pinnacle: a fast, automatic and accurate method for detecting and quantifying protein spots in 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis data · Bioinform. 2008 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioimage informatics › gel electrophoresis analysis
protein spot detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Pinnacle: a fast, automatic and accurate method for detecting and quantifying protein spots in 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis data · Bioinform. 2008 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics › ChIP-seq analysis
peak detection |
0.1 | 2 | 2007 | Feature extraction and quantification for mass spectrometry in biomedical applications using the mean spectrum · Bioinform. 2005 PrepMS: TOF MS data graphical preprocessing tool · Bioinform. 2007 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics › mass spectrometry data analysis
spectral preprocessing |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | PrepMS: TOF MS data graphical preprocessing tool · Bioinform. 2007 |
Computational science and engineering › computational reproducibility
reproducibility assessment |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Reproducibility of SELDI-TOF protein patterns in serum: comparing datasets from different experiments · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
differential expression analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Differential expression in SAGE: accounting for normal between-library variation · Bioinform. 2003 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Differential expression in SAGE: accounting for normal between-library variation · Bioinform. 2003 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
overdispersion modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Differential expression in SAGE: accounting for normal between-library variation · Bioinform. 2003 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biostatistics › statistical bioinformatics
statistical genomics |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Differential expression in SAGE: accounting for normal between-library variation · Bioinform. 2003 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sequential regression · 0.5penalized regression · 0.5wavelet-based functional mixed model · 0.2basis function modeling · 0.2hierarchical bayesian modeling · 0.2data integration · 0.2spot detection · 0.1normalization · 0.1time-of-flight mass spectrometry · 0.1mean spectrum · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Methylation-eQTL analysis in cancer researchabstractMOTIVATION: DNA methylation is a key epigenetic factor regulating gene expression. While promoter methylation has been well studied, recent publications have revealed that functionally important methylation also occurs in intergenic and distal regions, and varies across genes and tissue types. Given the growing importance of inter-platform integrative genomic analyses, there is an urgent need to develop methods to discover and characterize gene-level relationships between methylation and expression. RESULTS: We introduce a novel sequential penalized regression approach to identify methylation-expression quantitative trait loci (methyl-eQTLs), a term that we have coined to represent, for each gene and tissue type, a sparse set of CpG loci best explaining gene expression and accompanying weights indicating direction and strength of association. Using TCGA and MD Anderson colorectal cohorts to build and validate our models, we demonstrate our strategy better explains expression variability than current commonly used gene-level methylation summaries. The methyl-eQTLs identified by our approach can be used to construct gene-level methylation summaries that are maximally correlated with gene expression for use in integrative models, and produce a tissue-specific summary of which genes appear to be strongly regulated by methylation. Our results introduce an important resource to the biomedical community for integrative genomics analyses involving DNA methylation. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: We produce an R Shiny app (https://rstudio-prd-c1.pmacs.upenn.edu/methyl-eQTL/) that interactively presents methyl-eQTL results for colorectal, breast and pancreatic cancer. The source R code for this work is provided in the Supplementary Material. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Yusha Liu, Keith A. Baggerly, Elias Orouji, Ganiraju Manyam, Michael Lam, Jennifer S. Davis, Michael S. Lee, Bradley M. Broom, David G. Menter, Kunal Rai, Scott Kopetz, Jeffrey S. Morris |
Bioinform. | 13 |
| 2016 | Identification of differentially methylated loci using wavelet-based functional mixed modelsabstractMOTIVATION: DNA methylation is a key epigenetic modification that can modulate gene expression. Over the past decade, a lot of studies have focused on profiling DNA methylation and investigating its alterations in complex diseases such as cancer. While early studies were mostly restricted to CpG islands or promoter regions, recent findings indicate that many of important DNA methylation changes can occur in other regions and DNA methylation needs to be examined on a genome-wide scale. In this article, we apply the wavelet-based functional mixed model methodology to analyze the high-throughput methylation data for identifying differentially methylated loci across the genome. Contrary to many commonly-used methods that model probes independently, this framework accommodates spatial correlations across the genome through basis function modeling as well as correlations between samples through functional random effects, which allows it to be applied to many different settings and potentially leads to more power in detection of differential methylation. RESULTS: We applied this framework to three different high-dimensional methylation data sets (CpG Shore data, THREE data and NIH Roadmap Epigenomics data), studied previously in other works. A simulation study based on CpG Shore data suggested that in terms of detection of differentially methylated loci, this modeling approach using wavelets outperforms analogous approaches modeling the loci as independent. For the THREE data, the method suggests newly detected regions of differential methylation, which were not reported in the original study. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Automated software called WFMM is available at https://biostatistics.mdanderson.org/SoftwareDownload CpG Shore data is available at http://rafalab.dfci.harvard.edu NIH Roadmap Epigenomics data is available at http://compbio.mit.edu/roadmap SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. CONTACT: [email protected]. Wonyul Lee, Jeffrey S. Morris |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2013 | iBAG: integrative Bayesian analysis of high-dimensional multiplatform genomics dataabstractMOTIVATION: Analyzing data from multi-platform genomics experiments combined with patients' clinical outcomes helps us understand the complex biological processes that characterize a disease, as well as how these processes relate to the development of the disease. Current data integration approaches are limited in that they do not consider the fundamental biological relationships that exist among the data obtained from different platforms. Statistical Model: We propose an integrative Bayesian analysis of genomics data (iBAG) framework for identifying important genes/biomarkers that are associated with clinical outcome. This framework uses hierarchical modeling to combine the data obtained from multiple platforms into one model. RESULTS: We assess the performance of our methods using several synthetic and real examples. Simulations show our integrative methods to have higher power to detect disease-related genes than non-integrative methods. Using the Cancer Genome Atlas glioblastoma dataset, we apply the iBAG model to integrate gene expression and methylation data to study their associations with patient survival. Our proposed method discovers multiple methylation-regulated genes that are related to patient survival, most of which have important biological functions in other diseases but have not been previously studied in glioblastoma. AVAILABILITY: http://odin.mdacc.tmc.edu/∼vbaladan/. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani, Jeffrey S. Morris, Bradley M. Broom, Ganiraju Manyam, Kim-Anh Do |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2008 | Pinnacle: a fast, automatic and accurate method for detecting and quantifying protein spots in 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis dataabstractMOTIVATION: One of the key limitations for proteomic studies using 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DE) is the lack of rapid, robust and reproducible methods for detecting, matching and quantifying protein spots. The most commonly used approaches involve first detecting spots and drawing spot boundaries on individual gels, then matching spots across gels and finally quantifying each spot by calculating normalized spot volumes. This approach is time consuming, error-prone and frequently requires extensive manual editing, which can unintentionally introduce bias into the results. RESULTS: We introduce a new method for spot detection and quantification called Pinnacle that is automatic, quick, sensitive and specific and yields spot quantifications that are reliable and precise. This method incorporates a spot definition that is based on simple, straightforward criteria rather than complex arbitrary definitions, and results in no missing data. Using dilution series for validation, we demonstrate Pinnacle outperformed two well-established 2DE analysis packages, proving to be more accurate and yielding smaller coefficiant of variations (CVs). More accurate quantifications may lead to increased power for detecting differentially expressed spots, an idea supported by the results of our group comparison experiment. Our fast, automatic analysis method makes it feasible to conduct very large 2DE-based proteomic studies that are adequately powered to find important protein expression differences. AVAILABILITY: Matlab code to implement Pinnacle is available from the authors upon request for non-commercial use. Jeffrey S. Morris, Brittan N. Clark, Howard B. Gutstein |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2007 | PrepMS: TOF MS data graphical preprocessing toolabstractUNLABELLED: We introduce a simple-to-use graphical tool that enables researchers to easily prepare time-of-flight mass spectrometry data for analysis. For ease of use, the graphical executable provides default parameter settings, experimentally determined to work well in most situations. These values, if desired, can be changed by the user. PrepMS is a stand-alone application made freely available (open source), and is under the General Public License (GPL). Its graphical user interface, default parameter settings, and display plots allow PrepMS to be used effectively for data preprocessing, peak detection and visual data quality assessment. AVAILABILITY: Stand-alone executable files and Matlab toolbox are available for download at: http://sourceforge.net/projects/prepms Yuliya V. Karpievitch, Elizabeth G. Hill, Adam J. Smolka, Jeffrey S. Morris, Kevin R. Coombes, Keith A. Baggerly, Jonas S. Almeida |
Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2005 | Feature extraction and quantification for mass spectrometry in biomedical applications using the mean spectrumabstractMOTIVATION: Mass spectrometry yields complex functional data for which the features of scientific interest are peaks. A common two-step approach to analyzing these data involves first extracting and quantifying the peaks, then analyzing the resulting matrix of peak quantifications. Feature extraction and quantification involves a number of interrelated steps. It is important to perform these steps well, since subsequent analyses condition on these determinations. Also, it is difficult to compare the performance of competing methods for analyzing mass spectrometry data since the true expression levels of the proteins in the population are generally not known. RESULTS: In this paper, we introduce a new method for feature extraction in mass spectrometry data that uses translation-invariant wavelet transforms and performs peak detection using the mean spectrum. We examine the method's performance through examples and simulation, and demonstrate the advantages of using the mean spectrum to detect peaks. We also describe a new physics-based computer model of mass spectrometry and demonstrate how one may design simulation studies based on this tool to systematically compare competing methods. AVAILABILITY: MATLAB scripts to implement the methods described in this paper and R code for the virtual mass spectrometer are available at http://bioinformatics.mdanderson.org/software.html SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: http://bioinformatics.mdanderson.org/supplements.html. Jeffrey S. Morris, Kevin R. Coombes, John M. Koomen, Keith A. Baggerly, Ryuji Kobayashi |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2004 | Reproducibility of SELDI-TOF protein patterns in serum: comparing datasets from different experimentsabstractMOTIVATION: There has been much interest in using patterns derived from surface-enhanced laser desorption and ionization (SELDI) protein mass spectra from serum to differentiate samples from patients both with and without disease. Such patterns have been used without identification of the underlying proteins responsible. However, there are questions as to the stability of this procedure over multiple experiments. RESULTS: We compared SELDI proteomic spectra from serum from three experiments by the same group on separating ovarian cancer from normal tissue. These spectra are available on the web at http://clinicalproteomics.steem.com. In general, the results were not reproducible across experiments. Baseline correction prevents reproduction of the results for two of the experiments. In one experiment, there is evidence of a major shift in protocol mid-experiment which could bias the results. In another, structure in the noise regions of the spectra allows us to distinguish normal from cancer, suggesting that the normals and cancers were processed differently. Sets of features found to discriminate well in one experiment do not generalize to other experiments. Finally, the mass calibration in all three experiments appears suspect. Taken together, these and other concerns suggest that much of the structure uncovered in these experiments could be due to artifacts of sample processing, not to the underlying biology of cancer. We provide some guidelines for design and analysis in experiments like these to ensure better reproducible, biologically meaningfully results. AVAILABILITY: The MATLAB and Perl code used in our analyses is available at http://bioinformatics.mdanderson.org Keith A. Baggerly, Jeffrey S. Morris, Kevin R. Coombes |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2004 | Overdispersed logistic regression for SAGE: Modelling multiple groups and covariatesabstractBACKGROUND: Two major identifiable sources of variation in data derived from the Serial Analysis of Gene Expression (SAGE) are within-library sampling variability and between-library heterogeneity within a group. Most published methods for identifying differential expression focus on just the sampling variability. In recent work, the problem of assessing differential expression between two groups of SAGE libraries has been addressed by introducing a beta-binomial hierarchical model that explicitly deals with both of the above sources of variation. This model leads to a test statistic analogous to a weighted two-sample t-test. When the number of groups involved is more than two, however, a more general approach is needed. RESULTS: We describe how logistic regression with overdispersion supplies this generalization, carrying with it the framework for incorporating other covariates into the model as a byproduct. This approach has the advantage that logistic regression routines are available in several common statistical packages. CONCLUSIONS: The described method provides an easily implemented tool for analyzing SAGE data that correctly handles multiple types of variation and allows for more flexible modelling. Keith A. Baggerly, Jeffrey S. Morris, C. Marcelo Aldaz |
BMC Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2003 | Differential expression in SAGE: accounting for normal between-library variationabstractAbstract Motivation: In contrasting levels of gene expression between groups of SAGE libraries, the libraries within each group are often combined and the counts for the tag of interest summed, and inference is made on the basis of these larger ‘pseudolibraries’. While this captures the sampling variability inherent in the procedure, it fails to allow for normal variation in levels of the gene between individuals within the same group, and can consequently overstate the significance of the results. The effect is not slight: between-library variation can be hundreds of times the within-library variation. Results: We introduce a beta-binomial sampling model that correctly incorporates both sources of variation. We show how to fit the parameters of this model, and introduce a test statistic for differential expression similar to a two-sample t-test. Contact: [email protected] Supplementary information http://bioinformatics.mdanderson.org/ Includes Matlab and R code for fitting the model. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. Keith A. Baggerly, Jeffrey S. Morris, C. Marcelo Aldaz |
Bioinform. | 3 |