Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chen Wang 0050

dblp:82/4206-50 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 37% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 24% Image recognition and object detection · 18%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Computational photography and imaging · 75% Image and video processing · 25%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 81% Automated reasoning and model checking · 19%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational photography and imaging
image stitching
0.722018
Object-Centered Image Stitching · ECCV (3) 2018
Robust Image Stitching with Multiple Registrations · ECCV (2) 2018
Mathematical optimization › discrete optimization
energy minimization
0.422016
Relaxation-Based Preprocessing Techniques for Markov Random Field Inference · CVPR 2016
A Primal-Dual Algorithm for Higher-Order Multilabel Markov Random Fields · CVPR 2014
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.412020
Supervised Contrastive Learning · NeurIPS 2020
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.412020
Supervised Contrastive Learning · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
supervised contrastive learning
0.412020
Supervised Contrastive Learning · NeurIPS 2020
Image and video processing
image registration
0.312018
Robust Image Stitching with Multiple Registrations · ECCV (2) 2018
Computational photography and imaging › image stitching
robust image stitching
0.312018
Robust Image Stitching with Multiple Registrations · ECCV (2) 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
markov random field
0.312017
A Discriminative View of MRF Pre-processing Algorithms · ICCV 2017
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
markov random field inference
0.312017
A Discriminative View of MRF Pre-processing Algorithms · ICCV 2017
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization
0.212016
Relaxation-Based Preprocessing Techniques for Markov Random Field Inference · CVPR 2016
Automated reasoning and model checking › probabilistic inference
graphical model inference
0.212016
Relaxation-Based Preprocessing Techniques for Markov Random Field Inference · CVPR 2016
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization
0.212014
A Primal-Dual Algorithm for Higher-Order Multilabel Markov Random Fields · CVPR 2014
Mathematical optimization
primal-dual method
0.212014
A Primal-Dual Algorithm for Higher-Order Multilabel Markov Random Fields · CVPR 2014
Computer vision › 3D vision › stereo vision
stereo matching
0.112014
A Primal-Dual Algorithm for Higher-Order Multilabel Markov Random Fields · CVPR 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

expansion moves · 0.5QPBO · 0.5contrastive loss · 0.4max-flow · 0.4graph cuts · 0.4fusion moves · 0.4alpha-expansion · 0.4discriminative classification · 0.3dead end elimination · 0.3dead-end elimination · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Supervised Contrastive Learning
abstract
Contrastive learning applied to self-supervised representation learning has seen a resurgence in recent years, leading to state of the art performance in the unsupervised training of deep image models. Modern batch contrastive approaches subsume or significantly outperform traditional contrastive losses such as triplet, max-margin and the N-pairs loss. In this work, we extend the self-supervised batch contrastive approach to the fully-supervised setting, allowing us to effectively leverage label information. Clusters of points belonging to the same class are pulled together in embedding space, while simultaneously pushing apart clusters of samples from different classes. We analyze two possible versions of the supervised contrastive (SupCon) loss, identifying the best-performing formulation of the loss. On ResNet-200, we achieve top-1 accuracy of 81.4% on the ImageNet dataset, which is 0.8% above the best number reported for this architecture. We show consistent outperformance over cross-entropy on other datasets and two ResNet variants. The loss shows benefits for robustness to natural corruptions, and is more stable to hyperparameter settings such as optimizers and data augmentations. In reduced data settings, it outperforms cross-entropy significantly. Our loss function is simple to implement and reference TensorFlow code is released at https://t.ly/supcon.
Prannay Khosla, Piotr Teterwak, Chen Wang 0050, Aaron Sarna, Yonglong Tian, Phillip Isola, Aaron Maschinot, Ce Liu 0001, Dilip Krishnan
NeurIPS3
2018 Robust Image Stitching with Multiple Registrations
Charles Herrmann, Chen Wang 0050, Richard Strong Bowen, Emil Keyder, Michael Krainin, Ce Liu 0001, Ramin Zabih
ECCV (2)2
2018 Object-Centered Image Stitching
Charles Herrmann, Chen Wang 0050, Richard Strong Bowen, Emil Keyder, Ramin Zabih
ECCV (3)2
2017 A Discriminative View of MRF Pre-processing Algorithms
abstract
While Markov Random Fields (MRFs) are widely used in computer vision, they present a quite challenging inference problem. MRF inference can be accelerated by preprocessing techniques like Dead End Elimination (DEE) [8] or QPBO-based approaches [18, 24, 25] which compute the optimal labeling of a subset of variables. These techniques are guaranteed to never wrongly label a variable but they often leave a large number of variables unlabeled. We address this shortcoming by interpreting pre-processing as a classification problem, which allows us to trade off false positives (i.e., giving a variable an incorrect label) versus false negatives (i.e., failing to label a variable). We describe an efficient discriminative rule that finds optimal solutions for a subset of variables. Our technique provides both per-instance and worst-case guarantees concerning the quality of the solution. Empirical studies were conducted over several benchmark datasets. We obtain a speedup factor of 2 to 12 over expansion moves [4] without preprocessing, and on difficult non-submodular energy functions produce slightly lower energy.
Chen Wang 0050, Charles Herrmann, Ramin Zabih
ICCV1
2016 Relaxation-Based Preprocessing Techniques for Markov Random Field Inference
abstract
Markov Random Fields (MRFs) are a widely used graphical model, but the inference problem is NP-hard. For first-order MRFs with binary labels, Dead End Elimination (DEE) [7] and QPBO [2, 14] can find the optimal labeling for some variables, the much harder case of larger label sets has been addressed by Kovtun [16, 17] and related methods [12, 23, 24, 25], which impose substantial computational overhead. We describe an efficient algorithm to correctly label a subset of the variables for arbitrary MRFs, with particularly good performance on binary MRFs. We propose a sufficient condition to check if a partial labeling is optimal, which is a generalization of DEE's purely local test. We give a hierarchy of relaxations that provide larger optimal partial labelings at the cost of additional computation. Empirical studies were conducted on several benchmarks, using expansion moves [4] for inference. Our algorithm runs in a few seconds, and improves the speed of MRF inference with expansion moves by a factor of 1.5 to 12.
Chen Wang 0050, Ramin Zabih
CVPR1
2014 A Primal-Dual Algorithm for Higher-Order Multilabel Markov Random Fields
abstract
Graph cuts method such as α-expansion [4] and fusion moves [22] have been successful at solving many optimization problems in computer vision. Higher-order Markov Random Fields (MRF's), which are important for numerous applications, have proven to be very difficult, especially for multilabel MRF's (i.e. more than 2 labels). In this paper we propose a new primal-dual energy minimization method for arbitrary higher-order multilabel MRF's. Primal-dual methods provide guaranteed approximation bounds, and can exploit information in the dual variables to improve their efficiency. Our algorithm generalizes the PD3 [19] technique for first-order MRFs, and relies on a variant of max-flow that can exactly optimize certain higher-order binary MRF's [14]. We provide approximation bounds similar to PD3 [19], and the method is fast in practice. It can optimize non-submodular MRF's, and additionally can in- corporate problem-specific knowledge in the form of fusion proposals. We compare experimentally against the existing approaches that can efficiently handle these difficult energy functions [6, 10, 11]. For higher-order denoising and stereo MRF's, we produce lower energy while running significantly faster.
Alexander Fix, Chen Wang 0050, Ramin Zabih
CVPR2