EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Eldad Shai
dblp:82/433
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 61% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 30% Systems and software security · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography
digital signatures |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | The Proactive Security Toolkit and Applications · CCS 1999 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secret sharing
proactive secret sharing |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | The Proactive Security Toolkit and Applications · CCS 1999 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › threshold cryptography
proactive security |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | The Proactive Security Toolkit and Applications · CCS 1999 |
Systems and software security
intrusion tolerance |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | The Proactive Security Toolkit and Applications · CCS 1999 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
threshold cryptography · 0.0secret sharing · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | The Proactive Security Toolkit and ApplicationsabstractExisting security mechanisms focus on prevention of penetrations, detection of a penetration and (manual) recovery tools Indeed attackers focus their penetration efforts on breaking into critical modules, and on avoiding detection of the attack. As a result, security tools and procedures may cause the attackers to lose control over a specific module (computer, account), since the attacker would rather lose control than risk detection of the attack. While controlling the module, attacker may learn critical secret information or modify the module that make it much easier for the attacker to regain control over that module later. Recent results in cryptography give some hope of improving this situation; they show that many fundamental security tasks can be achieved with proactive security. Proactive security does not assume that there is any module completely secure against penetration Instead, we assume that at any given time period (day, week,.), a sufficient number of the modules in the system are secure (not penetrated). The results obtained so far include some of the most important cryptographic primitives such as signatures, secret sharing, and secure communication However, there was no usable implementation, and several critical issues (for actual use) were not addressed Boaz Barak, Amir Herzberg, Dalit Naor, Eldad Shai |
CCS | 4 |