Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
R. Refua
dblp:82/5470
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Routing and switching · 44% Internet architecture and protocols · 44% Network performance modeling · 13% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Internet architecture and protocols › packet processing
packet compression |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Delayed-dictionary compression for packet networks · INFOCOM 2005 |
Routing and switching › packet switching
packet-switched networks |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Delayed-dictionary compression for packet networks · INFOCOM 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
delayed-dictionary compression · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Delayed-dictionary compression for packet networksabstractThis paper considers compression in packet networks. Since data packets may be dropped or arrive reordered, streaming compression algorithms result in a considerable decoding latency. On the other hand, standard stateless packet compression algorithms that compress each packet independently, give a relatively poor compression ratio. We introduce a novel compression algorithm for packet networks: delayed-dictionary compression. By allowing delay in the dictionary construction, the algorithm handles effectively the problems of packet drops and packet reordering, while resulting with a compression quality which is often substantially better than standard stateless packet compression and has a smaller decoding latency than that of streaming compression. We conducted extensive experiments to establish the potential improvement for packet compression techniques, using many data files including the Calgary corpus and the Canterbury corpus. Experimental results of the new delayed-dictionary compression show that its main advantage is in low to medium speed links. Yossi Matias, R. Refua |
INFOCOM | 2 |