Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

R. Refua

dblp:82/5470 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Routing and switching · 44% Internet architecture and protocols · 44% Network performance modeling · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet architecture and protocols › packet processing
packet compression
0.112005
Delayed-dictionary compression for packet networks · INFOCOM 2005
Routing and switching › packet switching
packet-switched networks
0.112005
Delayed-dictionary compression for packet networks · INFOCOM 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

delayed-dictionary compression · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 Delayed-dictionary compression for packet networks
abstract
This paper considers compression in packet networks. Since data packets may be dropped or arrive reordered, streaming compression algorithms result in a considerable decoding latency. On the other hand, standard stateless packet compression algorithms that compress each packet independently, give a relatively poor compression ratio. We introduce a novel compression algorithm for packet networks: delayed-dictionary compression. By allowing delay in the dictionary construction, the algorithm handles effectively the problems of packet drops and packet reordering, while resulting with a compression quality which is often substantially better than standard stateless packet compression and has a smaller decoding latency than that of streaming compression. We conducted extensive experiments to establish the potential improvement for packet compression techniques, using many data files including the Calgary corpus and the Canterbury corpus. Experimental results of the new delayed-dictionary compression show that its main advantage is in low to medium speed links.
Yossi Matias, R. Refua
INFOCOM2