Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hoi Vo
dblp:82/553
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Compilers and program optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Compilers and program optimization › code size reduction
code compression |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | PPMexe: Program compression · ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
prediction by partial matching · 0.1instruction rescheduling · 0.1heuristic partitioning · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | PPMexe: Program compressionabstractWith the emergence of software delivery platforms, code compression has become an important system component that strongly affects performance. This article presents PPMexe, a compression mechanism for program binaries that analyzes their syntax and semantics to achieve superior compression ratios. We use the generic paradigm of prediction by partial matching (PPM) as the foundation of our compression codec. PPMexe combines PPM with two preprocessing steps: ( i ) instruction rescheduling to improve prediction rates and ( ii ) heuristic partitioning of a program binary into streams with high autocorrelation. We improve the traditional PPM algorithm by ( iii ) using an additional alphabet of frequent variable-length supersymbols extracted from the input stream of fixed-length symbols. In addition, PPMexe features ( iv ) a low-overhead mechanism that enables decompression starting from an arbitrary instruction of the executable, a property pivotal for runtime software delivery. We implemented PPMexe for x86 binaries and tested it on several large applications. Binaries compressed using PPMexe were 18--24% smaller than files created using off-the-shelf PPMD, one of the best available compressors Milenko Drinic, Darko Kirovski, Hoi Vo |
ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. | 3 |
| 2003 | Code Optimization for Code CompressionabstractWith the emergence of software delivery platforms such as Microsoft's .NET, the reduced size of transmitted binaries has become a very important system parameter, strongly affecting system performance. We present two novel pre-processing steps for code compression that explore program binaries' syntax and semantics to achieve superior compression ratios. The first preprocessing step involves heuristic partitioning of a program binary into streams with high auto-correlation. The second preprocessing step uses code optimization via instruction rescheduling in order to improve prediction probabilities for a given compression engine. We have developed three heuristics for instruction rescheduling that explore tradeoffs of the solution quality versus algorithm run-time. The pre-processing steps are integrated with the generic paradigm of prediction by partial matching (PPM) which is the basis of our compression codec. The compression algorithm is implemented for x86 binaries and tested on several large Microsoft applications. Binaries compressed using our compression codec are 18-24% smaller than those compressed using the best available off-the-shelf compressor. Milenko Drinic, Darko Kirovski, Hoi Vo |
CGO | 3 |