Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jiangtao Yin
dblp:82/5647
· DBLP profile ↗
12ranked-venue papers
8as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0003-2129-9569ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 6 · 4 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 4 first-authorComputer networks · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers |
Data mining · 77% Recommender systems · 20% Query processing and optimization · 3% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
4 papers |
Distributed systems · 85% Parallel and multicore computing · 15% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining › clustering
co-clustering |
0.4 | 2 | 2015 | Co-ClusterD: A Distributed Framework for Data Co-Clustering with Sequential Updates · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2015 Co-ClusterD: A Distributed Framework for Data Co-Clustering with Sequential Updates · ICDM 2013 |
Data mining › clustering › co-clustering
distributed co-clustering |
0.4 | 2 | 2015 | Co-ClusterD: A Distributed Framework for Data Co-Clustering with Sequential Updates · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2015 Co-ClusterD: A Distributed Framework for Data Co-Clustering with Sequential Updates · ICDM 2013 |
Recommender systems › collaborative filtering
matrix factorization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Scalable Distributed Nonnegative Matrix Factorization with Block-Wise Updates · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2018 |
Data mining › dimensionality reduction
nonnegative matrix factorization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Scalable Distributed Nonnegative Matrix Factorization with Block-Wise Updates · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2018 |
Distributed systems
distributed data processing |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Scalable Distributed Nonnegative Matrix Factorization with Block-Wise Updates · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2018 |
Distributed systems
distributed machine learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Scalable Distributed Nonnegative Matrix Factorization with Block-Wise Updates · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2018 |
Distributed systems › distributed machine learning
distributed matrix factorization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Scalable Distributed Nonnegative Matrix Factorization with Block-Wise Updates · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2018 |
Distributed systems › distributed data processing
distributed data mining |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Co-ClusterD: A Distributed Framework for Data Co-Clustering with Sequential Updates · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2015 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Co-ClusterD: A Distributed Framework for Data Co-Clustering with Sequential Updates · ICDM 2013 |
Parallel and multicore computing › data-parallel programming
mapreduce |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Efficient analytics on ordered datasets using MapReduce · HPDC 2013 |
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming models |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Co-ClusterD: A Distributed Framework for Data Co-Clustering with Sequential Updates · ICDM 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sequential updates · 0.8nonnegative matrix tri-factorization · 0.8lazy update · 0.7frequent updates · 0.7block-wise updates · 0.7expectation-maximization · 0.4information-theoretic co-clustering · 0.2information theoretic co-clustering · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | NEMA: Automatic Integration of Large Network Management DatabasesabstractNetwork management, whether for malfunction analysis, failure prediction, performance monitoring and improvement, generally involves large amounts of data from different sources. To effectively integrate and manage these sources, automatically finding semantic matches among their schemas or ontologies is crucial. Existing approaches on database matching mainly fall into two categories. One focuses on the schema-level matching based on schema properties such as field names, data types, constraints and schema structures. Network management databases contain massive tables (e.g., network products, incidents, security alert and logs) from different departments and groups with nonuniform field names and schema characteristics. It is not reliable to match them by those schema properties. The other category is based on the instance-level matching using general string similarity techniques, which are not applicable for the matching of large network management databases. In this article, we develop a matching technique for large NEtwork MAnagement databases (NEMA) deploying instance-level matching for effective data integration and connection. We design matching metrics and scores for both numerical and non-numerical fields and propose algorithms for matching these fields. The effectiveness and efficiency of NEMA are evaluated by conducting experiments based on ground truth field pairs in large network management databases. Our measurement on large databases with 1,458 fields, each of which contains over 10 million records, reveals that NEMA can achieve accuracy of 95%. We further compare with several other existing algorithms, and show that NEMA outperforms them by 7%-15% in numerical matching and achieves the best trade-off for non-numerical matching. Fubao Wu, Han Hee Song, Jiangtao Yin, Lixin Gao 0001, Mario Baldi, Narendra Anand |
IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manag. | 3 |
| 2018 | Accelerating distributed Expectation-Maximization algorithms with frequent updates
Jiangtao Yin, Yanfeng Zhang 0001, Lixin Gao 0001 |
J. Parallel Distributed Comput. | 1 |
| 2018 | Scalable Distributed Nonnegative Matrix Factorization with Block-Wise UpdatesabstractNonnegative Matrix Factorization (NMF) has been applied with great success on a wide range of applications. As NMF is increasingly applied to massive datasets such as web-scale dyadic data, it is desirable to leverage a cluster of machines to store those datasets and to speed up the factorization process. However, it is challenging to efficiently implement NMF in a distributed environment. In this paper, we show that by leveraging a new form of update functions, we can perform local aggregation and fully explore parallelism. Therefore, the new form is much more efficient than the traditional form in distributed implementations. Moreover, under the new form of update functions, we can perform frequent updates and lazy updates, which aim to use the most recently updated data whenever possible and avoid unnecessary computations. As a result, frequent updates and lazy updates are more efficient than their traditional concurrent counterparts. Through a series of experiments on a local cluster as well as the Amazon EC2 cloud, we demonstrate that our implementations with frequent updates or lazy updates are up to two orders of magnitude faster than the existing implementation with the traditional form of update functions. Jiangtao Yin, Lixin Gao 0001, Zhongfei Zhang |
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. | 1 |
| 2016 | Asynchronous Distributed Incremental Computation on Evolving Graphs
Jiangtao Yin, Lixin Gao 0001 |
ECML/PKDD (2) | 1 |
| 2015 | GOM-Hadoop: A distributed framework for efficient analytics on ordered datasets
Jiangtao Yin, Mario Baldi, Lixin Gao 0001, Antonio Nucci |
J. Parallel Distributed Comput. | 1 |
| 2015 | Co-ClusterD: A Distributed Framework for Data Co-Clustering with Sequential UpdatesabstractCo-clustering has emerged to be a powerful data mining tool for two-dimensional co-occurrence and dyadic data. However, co-clustering algorithms often require significant computational resources and have been dismissed as impractical for large data sets. Existing studies have provided strong empirical evidence that expectation-maximization (EM) algorithms (e.g., k-means algorithm) with sequential updates can significantly reduce the computational cost without degrading the resulting solution. Motivated by this observation, we introduce sequential updates for alternate minimization co-clustering (AMCC) algorithms which are variants of EM algorithms, and also show that AMCC algorithms with sequential updates converge. We then propose two approaches to parallelize AMCC algorithms with sequential updates in a distributed environment. Both approaches are proved to maintain the convergence properties of AMCC algorithms. Based on these two approaches, we present a new distributed framework, Co-ClusterD, which supports efficient implementations of AMCC algorithms with sequential updates. We design and implement Co-ClusterD, and show its efficiency through two AMCC algorithms: fast nonnegative matrix tri-factorization (FNMTF) and information theoretic co-clustering (ITCC). We evaluate our framework on both a local cluster of machines and the Amazon EC2 cloud. Empirical results show that AMCC algorithms implemented in Co-ClusterD can achieve a much faster convergence and often obtain better results than their traditional concurrent counterparts. Xiang Cheng 0003, Sen Su, Lixin Gao 0001, Jiangtao Yin |
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. | 4 |
| 2014 | Scalable Distributed Belief Propagation with Prioritized Block UpdatesabstractBelief propagation (BP) is a popular method for performing approximate inference on probabilistic graphical models. However, its message updates are time-consuming, and the schedule for updating messages is crucial to its running time and even convergence. In this paper, we propose a new scheduling scheme that selects a set of messages to update at a time and leverages a novel priority to determine which messages are selected. Additionally, an incremental update approach is introduced to accelerate the computation of the priority. As the size of the model grows, it is desirable to leverage the parallelism of a cluster of machines to reduce the inference time. Therefore, we design a distributed framework, Prom, to facilitate the implementation of BP algorithms. We evaluate the proposed scheduling scheme (supported by Prom) via extensive experiments on a local cluster as well as the Amazon EC2 cloud. The evaluation results show that our scheduling scheme outperforms the state-of-the-art counterpart. Jiangtao Yin, Lixin Gao 0001 |
CIKM | 1 |
| 2014 | Scalable Nonnegative Matrix Factorization with Block-wise Updates
Jiangtao Yin, Lixin Gao 0001, Zhongfei Zhang |
ECML/PKDD (3) | 1 |
| 2013 | Efficient analytics on ordered datasets using MapReduce
Jiangtao Yin, Mario Baldi, Lixin Gao 0001, Antonio Nucci |
HPDC | 1 |
| 2013 | Co-ClusterD: A Distributed Framework for Data Co-Clustering with Sequential UpdatesabstractCo-clustering is a powerful data mining tool for co-occurrence and dyadic data. As data sets become increasingly large, the scalability of co-clustering becomes more and more important. In this paper, we propose two approaches to parallelize co-clustering with sequential updates in a distributed environment. Based on these two approaches, we present a new distributed framework, Co-ClusterD, that supports efficient implementations of co-clustering algorithms with sequential updates. We design and implement Co-ClusterD, and show its efficiency through two co-clustering algorithms: fast nonnegative matrix tri-factorization (FNMTF) and information theoretic co-clustering (ITCC). We evaluate our framework on both a local cluster of machines and the Amazon EC2 cloud. Our evaluation shows that co-clustering algorithms implemented in Co-ClusterD can achieve better results and run faster than their traditional concurrent counterparts. Sen Su, Xiang Cheng 0003, Lixin Gao 0001, Jiangtao Yin |
ICDM | 4 |
| 2012 | Accelerating Expectation-Maximization Algorithms with Frequent UpdatesabstractExpectation Maximization is a popular approach for parameter estimation in many applications such as image understanding, document classification, or genome data analysis. Despite the popularity of EM algorithms, it is challenging to efficiently implement these algorithms in a distributed environment. In particular, many EM algorithms that frequently update the parameters have been shown to be much more efficient than their concurrent counterparts. Accordingly, we propose two approaches to parallelize such EM algorithms in a distributed environment so as to scale to massive data sets. We prove that both approaches maintain the convergence properties of the EM algorithms. Based on the approaches, we design and implement a distributed framework, FreEM, to support the implementation of frequent updates for the EM algorithms. We show its efficiency through three well-known EM applications: k-means clustering, fuzzy c-means clustering and parameter estimation for the Gaussian Mixture model. We evaluate our framework on both a local cluster of machines and the Amazon EC2 cloud. Our evaluation shows that the EM algorithms with frequent updates implemented on FreEM can run much faster than those implementations with traditional concurrent updates. Jiangtao Yin, Yanfeng Zhang 0001, Lixin Gao 0001 |
CLUSTER | 1 |
| 2012 | DPillar: Dual-port server interconnection network for large scale data centers
Jiangtao Yin, Lixin Gao 0001 |
Comput. Networks | 2 |