Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

J. G. Liao

dblp:82/5684 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 77% Medical and health informatics · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis
0.122007
Logistic regression for disease classification using microarray data: model selection in a large p and small n case · Bioinform. 2007
A mixture model for estimating the local false discovery rate in DNA microarray analysis · Bioinform. 2004
Medical and health informatics › clinical diagnosis
disease classification
0.112007
Logistic regression for disease classification using microarray data: model selection in a large p and small n case · Bioinform. 2007
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
gene selection
0.112007
Logistic regression for disease classification using microarray data: model selection in a large p and small n case · Bioinform. 2007
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
differential expression analysis
0.012004
A mixture model for estimating the local false discovery rate in DNA microarray analysis · Bioinform. 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

penalized regression · 0.1parametric bootstrap · 0.1logistic regression · 0.1local false discovery rate · 0.1smoothing · 0.0multiple testing · 0.0mixture model · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 Logistic regression for disease classification using microarray data: model selection in a large p and small n case
abstract
MOTIVATION: Logistic regression is a standard method for building prediction models for a binary outcome and has been extended for disease classification with microarray data by many authors. A feature (gene) selection step, however, must be added to penalized logistic modeling due to a large number of genes and a small number of subjects. Model selection for this two-step approach requires new statistical tools because prediction error estimation ignoring the feature selection step can be severely downward biased. Generic methods such as cross-validation and non-parametric bootstrap can be very ineffective due to the big variability in the prediction error estimate. RESULTS: We propose a parametric bootstrap model for more accurate estimation of the prediction error that is tailored to the microarray data by borrowing from the extensive research in identifying differentially expressed genes, especially the local false discovery rate. The proposed method provides guidance on the two critical issues in model selection: the number of genes to include in the model and the optimal shrinkage for the penalized logistic regression. We show that selecting more than 20 genes usually helps little in further reducing the prediction error. Application to Golub's leukemia data and our own cervical cancer data leads to highly accurate prediction models. AVAILABILITY: R library GeneLogit at http://geocities.com/jg_liao
J. G. Liao, Khew-Voon Chin
Bioinform.1
2004 A mixture model for estimating the local false discovery rate in DNA microarray analysis
abstract
MOTIVATION: Statistical methods based on controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) or positive false discovery rate (pFDR) are now well established in identifying differentially expressed genes in DNA microarray. Several authors have recently raised the important issue that FDR or pFDR may give misleading inference when specific genes are of interest because they average the genes under consideration with genes that show stronger evidence for differential expression. The paper proposes a flexible and robust mixture model for estimating the local FDR which quantifies how plausible each specific gene expresses differentially. RESULTS: We develop a special mixture model tailored to multiple testing by requiring the P-value distribution for the differentially expressed genes to be stochastically smaller than the P-value distribution for the non-differentially expressed genes. A smoothing mechanism is built in. The proposed model gives robust estimation of local FDR for any reasonable underlying P-value distributions. It also provides a single framework for estimating the proportion of differentially expressed genes, pFDR, negative predictive values, sensitivity and specificity. A cervical cancer study shows that the local FDR gives more specific and relevant quantification of the evidence for differential expression that can be substantially different from pFDR. AVAILABILITY: An R function implementing the proposed model is available at http://www.geocities.com/jg_liao/software
J. G. Liao, Zachariah E. Selvanayagam, Weichung Joe Shih
Bioinform.1