Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

M. Shreedhar

dblp:82/5853 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
2 papers
Internet architecture and protocols · 55% Network optimization and economics · 30% Routing and switching · 15%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet architecture and protocols › packet scheduling
fair queueing
0.021996
Efficient fair queueing using deficit round-robin · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 1996
Efficient Fair Queueing Using Deficit Round Robin · SIGCOMM 1995
Internet architecture and protocols
packet scheduling
0.021996
Efficient fair queueing using deficit round-robin · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 1996
Efficient Fair Queueing Using Deficit Round Robin · SIGCOMM 1995
Routing and switching › switch scheduling
deficit round-robin
0.011996
Efficient fair queueing using deficit round-robin · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 1996
Network optimization and economics › resource allocation › bandwidth allocation
fair bandwidth allocation
0.011995
Efficient Fair Queueing Using Deficit Round Robin · SIGCOMM 1995
Network optimization and economics
resource allocation
0.011995
Efficient Fair Queueing Using Deficit Round Robin · SIGCOMM 1995
Network optimization and economics
fairness
0.011996
Efficient fair queueing using deficit round-robin · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 1996

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

deficit round robin · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1996 Efficient fair queueing using deficit round-robin
abstract
Fair queuing is a technique that allows each flow passing through a network device to have a fair share of network resources. Previous schemes for fair queuing that achieved nearly perfect fairness were expensive to implement; specifically, the work required to process a packet in these schemes was O(log(n)), where n is the number of active flows. This is expensive at high speeds. On the other hand, cheaper approximations of fair queuing reported in the literature exhibit unfair behavior. In this paper, we describe a new approximation of fair queuing, that we call deficit round-robin. Our scheme achieves nearly perfect fairness in terms of throughput, requires only O(1) work to process a packet, and is simple enough to implement in hardware. Deficit round-robin is also applicable to other scheduling problems where servicing cannot be broken up into smaller units (such as load balancing) and to distributed queues.
M. Shreedhar, George Varghese
IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw.1
1995 Efficient Fair Queueing Using Deficit Round Robin
abstract
Fair queuing is a technique that allows each flow passing through a network device to have fair share of network resources. previous schemes for fair queuing that achieved nearly perfect fairness were expensive to implement: specifically, the work required to process a packet in these schemes was O(log(n)), where n is the number of active flows. This is expensive at high speeds. On the other hand, cheaper approximations of fair queuing that have been reported in the literature exhibit unfair behavior. In this paper, we describe a new approximation of fair queuing, that we call Deficit Round Robin. Our scheme achieves nearly perfect fairness in terms of throughput, requires only O(1) work to process a packet, and is simple enough to implement in hardware. Deficit Round Robin is also applicable to other scheduling problems where servicing cannot be broken up into smaller units.
M. Shreedhar, George Varghese
SIGCOMM1