Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

William C. Lynch

dblp:82/5858 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1979
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
3 papers
Operating systems · 56% Empirical software engineering · 28% Software testing · 16%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Operating systems
operating system reliability
0.011975
Reliability Experience with Chi/OS · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1975
Software testing
software reliability
0.011975
Reliability Experience with Chi/OS · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1975
Operating systems
kernel
0.011979
Pilot: An Operating System for a Personal Computer (Summary) · SOSP 1979

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

case study · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1979 Pilot: A Software Engineering Case Study
R. R. Horsley, William C. Lynch
ICSE2
1979 Pilot: An Operating System for a Personal Computer (Summary)
abstract
The Pilot operating system is designed for the personal computing environment. It provides a basic set of services within which higher-level programs can more easily serve the user and/or communicate with other programs on other machines. Pilot omits certain functions sometimes associated with “complete” operating systems, such as character-string naming or user-command interpretation; higher-level software provides such facilities as needed. On the other hand, Pilot provides a higher level of service than that normally associated with the “kernel” or “nucleus” of an operating system. Pilot is closely coupled to the Mesa programming language and runs on a rather powerful personal computer, which would have been thought sufficient to support a substantial timesharing system of a few years ago. The primary user interface is a high resolution bit-map display, with a keyboard and a pointing device. Secondary storage generally takes the form of a sizable local disk. A local packet network provides a high bandwidth connection to other personal computers, and to server systems offering such remote services as printing and shared file storage.
David D. Redell, Yogen K. Dalal, Thomas R. Horsley, Hugh C. Lauer, William C. Lynch, Paul R. McJones, Hal G. Murray, Stephen C. Purcell
SOSP5
1975 Reliability Experience with Chi/OS
abstract
The Chi/OS operating system, the latest large-scale software effort of Chi Corporation, has had an excellent reliability record since its installation in November 1973. Although the system design is vital to the reliability of Chi/OS, several environmental factors are equally vital. After a brief presentation of the substantial work load supported by Chi/OS, this paper deals with those environmental factors which contribute to the reliability of the software.
William C. Lynch, John W. Langner, Marvin S. Schwartz
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.1
1965 More Combinatorial Properties of Certain Trees
abstract
A detailed examination of binary search trees reveals that the probability of making precisely i comparisons in placing the (n−1)th item in the tree is related to the (n−i)th symmetric function of the integers 1, …, n. A recurrence relation for the moments of this distribution of comparisons is derived, and formulas for the mean number of comparisons and its variance are displayed. These are shown to be in accord with previously published values.
William C. Lynch
Comput. J.1