Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Navin Rustagi

dblp:82/6732 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 62% Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 38%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems
peer-to-peer systems
0.112008
The forgiving tree: a self-healing distributed data structure · PODC 2008
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
self-healing
0.112008
The forgiving tree: a self-healing distributed data structure · PODC 2008
Distributed systems › fault tolerance › resilience
adversarial resilience
0.012008
The forgiving tree: a self-healing distributed data structure · PODC 2008
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.012008
The forgiving tree: a self-healing distributed data structure · PODC 2008
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 A hybrid computational strategy to address WGS variant analysis in >5000 samples
abstract
BACKGROUND: The decreasing costs of sequencing are driving the need for cost effective and real time variant calling of whole genome sequencing data. The scale of these projects are far beyond the capacity of typical computing resources available with most research labs. Other infrastructures like the cloud AWS environment and supercomputers also have limitations due to which large scale joint variant calling becomes infeasible, and infrastructure specific variant calling strategies either fail to scale up to large datasets or abandon joint calling strategies. RESULTS: We present a high throughput framework including multiple variant callers for single nucleotide variant (SNV) calling, which leverages hybrid computing infrastructure consisting of cloud AWS, supercomputers and local high performance computing infrastructures. We present a novel binning approach for large scale joint variant calling and imputation which can scale up to over 10,000 samples while producing SNV callsets with high sensitivity and specificity. As a proof of principle, we present results of analysis on Cohorts for Heart And Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology (CHARGE) WGS freeze 3 dataset in which joint calling, imputation and phasing of over 5300 whole genome samples was produced in under 6 weeks using four state-of-the-art callers. The callers used were SNPTools, GATK-HaplotypeCaller, GATK-UnifiedGenotyper and GotCloud. We used Amazon AWS, a 4000-core in-house cluster at Baylor College of Medicine, IBM power PC Blue BioU at Rice and Rhea at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) for the computation. AWS was used for joint calling of 180 TB of BAM files, and ORNL and Rice supercomputers were used for the imputation and phasing step. All other steps were carried out on the local compute cluster. The entire operation used 5.2 million core hours and only transferred a total of 6 TB of data across the platforms. CONCLUSIONS: Even with increasing sizes of whole genome datasets, ensemble joint calling of SNVs for low coverage data can be accomplished in a scalable, cost effective and fast manner by using heterogeneous computing platforms without compromising on the quality of variants.
Zhuoyi Huang, Navin Rustagi, Narayanan Veeraraghavan, Andrew Carroll, Richard A. Gibbs, Eric Boerwinkle, Manjunath Gorentla Venkata, Fuli Yu
BMC Bioinform.2
2016 ITD assembler: an algorithm for internal tandem duplication discovery from short-read sequencing data
abstract
BACKGROUND: Detection of tandem duplication within coding exons, referred to as internal tandem duplication (ITD), remains challenging due to inefficiencies in alignment of ITD-containing reads to the reference genome. There is a critical need to develop efficient methods to recover these important mutational events. RESULTS: In this paper we introduce ITD Assembler, a novel approach that rapidly evaluates all unmapped and partially mapped reads from whole exome NGS data using a De Bruijn graphs approach to select reads that harbor cycles of appropriate length, followed by assembly using overlap-layout-consensus. We tested ITD Assembler on The Cancer Genome Atlas AML dataset as a truth set. ITD Assembler identified the highest percentage of reported FLT3-ITDs when compared to other ITD detection algorithms, and discovered additional ITDs in FLT3, KIT, CEBPA, WT1 and other genes. Evidence of polymorphic ITDs in 54 genes were also found. Novel ITDs were validated by analyzing the corresponding RNA sequencing data. CONCLUSIONS: ITD Assembler is a very sensitive tool which can detect partial, large and complex tandem duplications. This study highlights the need to more effectively look for ITD's in other cancers and Mendelian diseases.
Navin Rustagi, Oliver A. Hampton, Liu Xi, Richard A. Gibbs, Sharon E. Plon, Marek Kimmel, David A. Wheeler
BMC Bioinform.1
2008 The forgiving tree: a self-healing distributed data structure
abstract
We consider the problem of self-healing in peer-to-peer networks that are under repeated attack by an omniscient adversary. We assume that the following process continues for up to n rounds where n is the total number of nodes initially in the network: the adversary deletesan arbitrary node from the network, then the network responds by quickly adding a small number of new edges.
Thomas P. Hayes, Navin Rustagi, Jared Saia, Amitabh Trehan
PODC2
2007 Worm Versus Alert: Who Wins in a Battle for Control of a Large-Scale Network?
James Aspnes, Navin Rustagi, Jared Saia
OPODIS2