Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Erik Strumbelj
dblp:82/6768
· DBLP profile ↗
15ranked-venue papers
5as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-6071-0491ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 6 · 4 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 90% Trustworthy machine learning · 10% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian prediction
bayesian ensemble methods |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Bayesian Combination of Probabilistic Classifiers using Multivariate Normal Mixtures · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
mixture model |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Bayesian Combination of Probabilistic Classifiers using Multivariate Normal Mixtures · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Bayesian Combination of Probabilistic Classifiers using Multivariate Normal Mixtures · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
gibbs sampling |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Bayesian Combination of Probabilistic Classifiers using Multivariate Normal Mixtures · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | An Efficient Explanation of Individual Classifications using Game Theory · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2010 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › cooperative game theory › solution concepts
shapley value |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | An Efficient Explanation of Individual Classifications using Game Theory · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
inverse additive logistic transformation · 0.4gibbs sampler · 0.4game theory · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | A General Approach to Visualizing Uncertainty in Statistical GraphicsabstractWe present a general approach to visualizing uncertainty in static 2-D statistical graphics. If we treat a visualization as a function of its underlying quantities, uncertainty in those quantities induces a distribution over images. We show how to aggregate these images into a single visualization that represents the uncertainty. The approach can be viewed as a generalization of sample-based approaches that use overlay. Notably, standard representations, such as confidence intervals and bands, emerge with their usual coverage guarantees without being explicitly quantified or visualized. As a proof of concept, we implement our approach in the IID setting using resampling, provided as an open-source Python library. Because the approach operates directly on images, the user needs only to supply the data and the code for visualizing the quantities of interest without uncertainty. Through several examples, we show how both familiar and novel forms of uncertainty visualization can be created. The implementation is not only a practical validation of the underlying theory but also an immediately usable tool that can complement existing uncertainty-visualization libraries. Bernarda Petek, David Nabergoj, Erik Strumbelj |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 3 |
| 2025 | Empirical evaluation of normalizing flows in Markov chain Monte CarloabstractAbstract Recent advances in MCMC use normalizing flows to precondition target distributions and enable jumps to distant regions. However, there is currently no systematic comparison of different normalizing flow architectures for MCMC. As such, many works choose simple flow architectures that are readily available and do not consider other models. Guidelines for choosing an appropriate architecture would reduce analysis time for practitioners and motivate researchers to take the recommended models as foundations to be improved. We provide the first such guideline by extensively evaluating many normalizing flow architectures on various flow-based MCMC methods and target distributions. When the target density gradient is available, we show that flow-based MCMC outperforms classic MCMC for suitable NF architecture choices with minor hyperparameter tuning. When the gradient is unavailable, flow-based MCMC wins with off-the-shelf architectures. We find contractive residual flows to be the best general-purpose models with relatively low sensitivity to hyperparameter choice. We also provide various insights into normalizing flow behavior within MCMC when varying their hyperparameters, properties of target distributions, and the overall computational budget. David Nabergoj, Erik Strumbelj |
Mach. Learn. | 2 |
| 2022 | Bayesian Gaussian process factor analysis with copula for count data
Gregor Pirs, Erik Strumbelj |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 2 |
| 2020 | Automatic attribute construction for basketball modelling
Petar Vracar, Erik Strumbelj, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
Knowl. Inf. Syst. | 2 |
| 2019 | Bayesian Combination of Probabilistic Classifiers using Multivariate Normal MixturesabstractEnsemble methods are a powerful tool, often outperforming individual prediction models. Existing Bayesian ensembles either do not model the correlations between sources, or they are only capable of combining non-probabilistic predictions. We propose a new model, which overcomes these disadvantages. Transforming the probabilistic predictions with the inverse additive logistic transformation allows us to model the correlations with multivariate normal mixtures. We derive an efficient Gibbs sampler for the proposed model and implement a regularization method to make it more robust. We compare our method to related work and the classical linear opinion pool. Empirical evaluation on several toy and real-world data sets, including a case study on air-pollution forecasting, shows that the method outperforms other methods, while being robust and easy to use. Gregor Pirs, Erik Strumbelj |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2019 | An OpenCL library for parallel random number generators
Tadej Ciglaric, Rok Cesnovar, Erik Strumbelj |
J. Supercomput. | 3 |
| 2018 | A Bayesian approach to forecasting daily air-pollutant levels
Jana Faganeli Pucer, Gregor Pirs, Erik Strumbelj |
Knowl. Inf. Syst. | 3 |
| 2016 | Modeling basketball play-by-play data
Petar Vracar, Erik Strumbelj, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 2 |
| 2014 | Explaining prediction models and individual predictions with feature contributions
Erik Strumbelj, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
Knowl. Inf. Syst. | 1 |
| 2013 | Efficiently explaining the predictions of a probabilistic radial basis function classification networkabstractA probabilistic radial basis function (PRBF) network is an effective non-linear classifier. However, similar to most other neural network models it is non-transparent, which makes its predictions difficult to interpret. In this paper we show how a one-variable-at-a-time and an all-subsets explanation method can be modified for an equivalent and more efficient use with PRBF network classifiers. We use several artificial and real-life data sets to demonstrate the usefulness of the visualizations and explanations of the PRBF network classifier. Marko Robnik-Sikonja, Erik Strumbelj, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
Intell. Data Anal. | 2 |
| 2012 | Quality of classification explanations with PRBF
Marko Robnik-Sikonja, Igor Kononenko 0001, Erik Strumbelj |
Neurocomputing | 3 |
| 2010 | An Efficient Explanation of Individual Classifications using Game Theory
Erik Strumbelj, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2010 | Explanation and reliability of prediction models: the case of breast cancer recurrence
Erik Strumbelj, Zoran Bosnic, Igor Kononenko 0001, Branko Zakotnik, Cvetka Grasic Kuhar |
Knowl. Inf. Syst. | 1 |
| 2009 | Explaining instance classifications with interactions of subsets of feature values
Erik Strumbelj, Igor Kononenko 0001, Marko Robnik-Sikonja |
Data Knowl. Eng. | 1 |
| 2008 | Towards a Model Independent Method for Explaining Classification for Individual Instances
Erik Strumbelj, Igor Kononenko 0001 |
DaWaK | 1 |