Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Evgenij Thorstensen
dblp:82/7995
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Database theory · 61% Data integration and cleaning · 30% Data models and query languages · 9% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data integration and cleaning
ontology-based data access |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Mapping Repair in Ontology-based Data Access Evolving Systems · IJCAI 2017 |
Database theory
query answering |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Mapping Repair in Ontology-based Data Access Evolving Systems · IJCAI 2017 |
Database theory
query complexity |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Mapping Repair in Ontology-based Data Access Evolving Systems · IJCAI 2017 |
Data models and query languages
description logics |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Mapping Repair in Ontology-based Data Access Evolving Systems · IJCAI 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
ontology evolution · 0.3minimal change · 0.3constraint satisfaction · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | On Equivalence and Cores for Incomplete Databases in Open and Closed WorldsabstractData exchange heavily relies on the notion of incomplete database instances. Several semantics for such instances have been proposed and include open (OWA), closed (CWA), and open-closed (OCWA) world. For all these semantics important questions are: whether one incomplete instance semantically implies another; when two are semantically equivalent; and whether a smaller or smallest semantically equivalent instance exists. For OWA and CWA these questions are fully answered. For several variants of OCWA, however, they remain open. In this work we adress these questions for Closed Powerset semantics and the OCWA semantics of Libkin and Sirangelo, 2011. We define a new OCWA semantics, called OCWA*, in terms of homomorphic covers that subsumes both semantics, and characterize semantic implication and equivalence in terms of such covers. This characterization yields a guess-and-check algorithm to decide equivalence, and shows that the problem is NP-complete. For the minimization problem we show that for several common notions of minimality there is in general no unique minimal equivalent instance for Closed Powerset semantics, and consequently not for the more expressive OCWA* either. However, for Closed Powerset semantics we show that one can find, for any incomplete database, a unique finite set of its subinstances which are subinstances (up to renaming of nulls) of all instances semantically equivalent to the original incomplete one. We study properties of this set, and extend the analysis to OCWA*. Henrik Forssell, Evgeny Kharlamov, Evgenij Thorstensen |
ICDT | 3 |
| 2017 | Mapping Repair in Ontology-based Data Access Evolving SystemsabstractIn this paper we study the evolution of ontology-based data access (OBDA) specifications, and focus on the case in which the ontology and/or the data source schema change, which may require a modification to the mapping between them to preserve both consistency and knowledge. Our approach is based on the idea of repairing the mapping according to the usual principle of minimal change and on a recent, mapping-based notion of consistency of the specification. We define and analyze two notions of mapping repair under ontology and source schema update. We then present a set of results on the complexity of query answering in the above framework, when the ontology is expressed in DL-LiteR. Domenico Lembo, Riccardo Rosati 0001, Valerio Santarelli, Domenico Fabio Savo, Evgenij Thorstensen |
IJCAI | 5 |
| 2015 | BootOX: Practical Mapping of RDBs to OWL 2
Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz, Evgeny Kharlamov, Dmitriy Zheleznyakov, Ian Horrocks 0001, Christoph Pinkel, Martin G. Skjæveland, Evgenij Thorstensen, Jose Mora |
ISWC (2) | 7 |
| 2015 | Ontology Based Access to Exploration Data at Statoil
Evgeny Kharlamov, Dag Hovland, Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz, Davide Lanti, Hallstein Lie, Christoph Pinkel, Martín Rezk, Martin G. Skjæveland, Evgenij Thorstensen, Guohui Xiao 0001, Dmitriy Zheleznyakov, Ian Horrocks 0001 |
ISWC (2) | 9 |
| 2015 | Mapping Analysis in Ontology-Based Data Access: Algorithms and Complexity
Domenico Lembo, Jose Mora, Riccardo Rosati 0001, Domenico Fabio Savo, Evgenij Thorstensen |
ISWC (1) | 5 |
| 2013 | Tractable Combinations of Global Constraints
David A. Cohen, Peter Jeavons 0001, Evgenij Thorstensen, Stanislav Zivný |
CP | 3 |
| 2013 | Lifting Structural Tractability to CSP with Global Constraints
Evgenij Thorstensen |
CP | 1 |
| 2011 | Optimization Methods for the Partner Units Problem
Markus Aschinger, Conrad Drescher, Gerhard Friedrich, Georg Gottlob, Peter Jeavons 0001, Anna Ryabokon, Evgenij Thorstensen |
CPAIOR | 7 |
| 2011 | Tackling the Partner Units Configuration Problem
Markus Aschinger, Conrad Drescher, Georg Gottlob, Peter Jeavons 0001, Evgenij Thorstensen |
IJCAI | 5 |
| 2011 | Structural Decomposition Methods and What They are Good ForabstractThis paper reviews structural problem decomposition methods, such as tree and path decompositions. It is argued that these notions can be applied in two distinct ways: Either to show that a problem is efficiently solvable when a width parameter is fixed, or to prove that the unrestricted (or some width-parameter free) version of a problem is tractable by using a width-notion as a mathematical tool for directly solving the problem at hand. Examples are given for both cases. As a new showcase for the latter usage, we report some recent results on the Partner Units Problem, a form of configuration problem arising in an industrial context. We use the notion of a path decomposition to identify and solve a tractable class of instances of this problem with practical relevance. Markus Aschinger, Conrad Drescher, Georg Gottlob, Peter Jeavons 0001, Evgenij Thorstensen |
STACS | 5 |