Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Evgenij Thorstensen

dblp:82/7995 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Database theory · 61% Data integration and cleaning · 30% Data models and query languages · 9%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data integration and cleaning
ontology-based data access
0.312017
Mapping Repair in Ontology-based Data Access Evolving Systems · IJCAI 2017
Database theory
query answering
0.312017
Mapping Repair in Ontology-based Data Access Evolving Systems · IJCAI 2017
Database theory
query complexity
0.312017
Mapping Repair in Ontology-based Data Access Evolving Systems · IJCAI 2017
Data models and query languages
description logics
0.112017
Mapping Repair in Ontology-based Data Access Evolving Systems · IJCAI 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ontology evolution · 0.3minimal change · 0.3constraint satisfaction · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 On Equivalence and Cores for Incomplete Databases in Open and Closed Worlds
abstract
Data exchange heavily relies on the notion of incomplete database instances. Several semantics for such instances have been proposed and include open (OWA), closed (CWA), and open-closed (OCWA) world. For all these semantics important questions are: whether one incomplete instance semantically implies another; when two are semantically equivalent; and whether a smaller or smallest semantically equivalent instance exists. For OWA and CWA these questions are fully answered. For several variants of OCWA, however, they remain open. In this work we adress these questions for Closed Powerset semantics and the OCWA semantics of Libkin and Sirangelo, 2011. We define a new OCWA semantics, called OCWA*, in terms of homomorphic covers that subsumes both semantics, and characterize semantic implication and equivalence in terms of such covers. This characterization yields a guess-and-check algorithm to decide equivalence, and shows that the problem is NP-complete. For the minimization problem we show that for several common notions of minimality there is in general no unique minimal equivalent instance for Closed Powerset semantics, and consequently not for the more expressive OCWA* either. However, for Closed Powerset semantics we show that one can find, for any incomplete database, a unique finite set of its subinstances which are subinstances (up to renaming of nulls) of all instances semantically equivalent to the original incomplete one. We study properties of this set, and extend the analysis to OCWA*.
Henrik Forssell, Evgeny Kharlamov, Evgenij Thorstensen
ICDT3
2017 Mapping Repair in Ontology-based Data Access Evolving Systems
abstract
In this paper we study the evolution of ontology-based data access (OBDA) specifications, and focus on the case in which the ontology and/or the data source schema change, which may require a modification to the mapping between them to preserve both consistency and knowledge. Our approach is based on the idea of repairing the mapping according to the usual principle of minimal change and on a recent, mapping-based notion of consistency of the specification. We define and analyze two notions of mapping repair under ontology and source schema update. We then present a set of results on the complexity of query answering in the above framework, when the ontology is expressed in DL-LiteR.
Domenico Lembo, Riccardo Rosati 0001, Valerio Santarelli, Domenico Fabio Savo, Evgenij Thorstensen
IJCAI5
2015 BootOX: Practical Mapping of RDBs to OWL 2
Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz, Evgeny Kharlamov, Dmitriy Zheleznyakov, Ian Horrocks 0001, Christoph Pinkel, Martin G. Skjæveland, Evgenij Thorstensen, Jose Mora
ISWC (2)7
2015 Ontology Based Access to Exploration Data at Statoil
Evgeny Kharlamov, Dag Hovland, Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz, Davide Lanti, Hallstein Lie, Christoph Pinkel, Martín Rezk, Martin G. Skjæveland, Evgenij Thorstensen, Guohui Xiao 0001, Dmitriy Zheleznyakov, Ian Horrocks 0001
ISWC (2)9
2015 Mapping Analysis in Ontology-Based Data Access: Algorithms and Complexity
Domenico Lembo, Jose Mora, Riccardo Rosati 0001, Domenico Fabio Savo, Evgenij Thorstensen
ISWC (1)5
2013 Tractable Combinations of Global Constraints
David A. Cohen, Peter Jeavons 0001, Evgenij Thorstensen, Stanislav Zivný
CP3
2013 Lifting Structural Tractability to CSP with Global Constraints
Evgenij Thorstensen
CP1
2011 Optimization Methods for the Partner Units Problem
Markus Aschinger, Conrad Drescher, Gerhard Friedrich, Georg Gottlob, Peter Jeavons 0001, Anna Ryabokon, Evgenij Thorstensen
CPAIOR7
2011 Tackling the Partner Units Configuration Problem
Markus Aschinger, Conrad Drescher, Georg Gottlob, Peter Jeavons 0001, Evgenij Thorstensen
IJCAI5
2011 Structural Decomposition Methods and What They are Good For
abstract
This paper reviews structural problem decomposition methods, such as tree and path decompositions. It is argued that these notions can be applied in two distinct ways: Either to show that a problem is efficiently solvable when a width parameter is fixed, or to prove that the unrestricted (or some width-parameter free) version of a problem is tractable by using a width-notion as a mathematical tool for directly solving the problem at hand. Examples are given for both cases. As a new showcase for the latter usage, we report some recent results on the Partner Units Problem, a form of configuration problem arising in an industrial context. We use the notion of a path decomposition to identify and solve a tractable class of instances of this problem with practical relevance.
Markus Aschinger, Conrad Drescher, Georg Gottlob, Peter Jeavons 0001, Evgenij Thorstensen
STACS5