Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Narendra Kumar Gupta

dblp:82/888 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 86% Data integration and cleaning · 14%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
distributed information retrieval
0.021995
Learning Collection Fusion Strategies · SIGIR 1995
Learning Collection Fusion Strategies for Information Retrieval · ICML 1995
Information retrieval › distributed information retrieval
result fusion
0.021995
Learning Collection Fusion Strategies · SIGIR 1995
Learning Collection Fusion Strategies for Information Retrieval · ICML 1995
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.021995
Learning Collection Fusion Strategies · SIGIR 1995
Learning Collection Fusion Strategies for Information Retrieval · ICML 1995
Data integration and cleaning
data fusion
0.011995
Learning Collection Fusion Strategies · SIGIR 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

learning to rank · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Inter-rater Reliability in Determining the Types of Vegetation on Railway Trackbeds
Roger G. Nyberg, Siril Yella, Narendra Kumar Gupta, Mark Dougherty
WISE (2)3
2015 Reliability of Manual Assessments in Determining the Types of Vegetation on Railway Tracks
Siril Yella, Roger G. Nyberg, Narendra Kumar Gupta, Mark Dougherty
WISE (2)3
2006 Condition Monitoring Using Pattern Recognition Techniques on Data from Acoustic Emissions
abstract
Condition monitoring applications deploying the usage of impact acoustic techniques are mostly done intuitively by skilled personnel. In this article, a pattern recognition approach is taken to automate such intuitive human skills for the development of more robust and reliable testing methods. The focus of this work is to use the approach as a part of a major research project in the rail inspection area, within the domain of intelligent transport systems. Data from impact acoustic tests made on wooden beams have been used. The relation between condition of the wooden beams and respective sounds they make when struck, has been analyzed experimentally. Features were extracted from the acoustic emissions of wooden beams and were used for pattern classification. Features such as magnitude of the signal, natural logarithm of the magnitude and Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients, yielded good results. The extracted feature vectors were used as input to various pattern classifiers for further pattern recognition task. The effect of using classifiers like support vector machines and multi-layer perceptron has been tested and compared. Results obtained experimentally, demonstrate that support vector machines provide good detection rates for the classification of impact acoustic signals in the NDT domain
Siril Yella, Narendra Kumar Gupta, Marc Dougherty
ICMLA2
1996 An Investigation into the Improvement of Local Minima of the Hopfield Network
Mengkang Peng, Narendra Kumar Gupta, Alistair F. Armitage
Neural Networks2
1995 Learning Collection Fusion Strategies for Information Retrieval
Geoffrey G. Towell, Ellen M. Voorhees, Narendra Kumar Gupta, Ben Johnson-Laird
ICML3
1995 Learning Collection Fusion Strategies
abstract
Collectionfusion is a data fusion problem in which the results of retrieval runs on separate, autonomous document collections must be merged to produce a single, effective result.This paper explores two collection fusion techniques that learn the rmrnber of documents to retrieve from each collection using only the ranked lists of documents returned in response to past queries and those documents!relevance judgments.Retrieval experiments using the TREC test co]lection demonstrate that the effectiveness of the fusion techniques is within 10'?% of the effectiveness of a run in which the entire set of documents is treated as a single collection.
Ellen M. Voorhees, Narendra Kumar Gupta, Ben Johnson-Laird
SIGIR2