Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sanjit Chatterjee

dblp:82/921 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
17ranked-venue papers
16as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0004-6360-9152ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 12 · 11 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 3 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
5 papers
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 83% Hardware security and side channels · 8% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 8%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography
elliptic curve cryptography
0.422017
On Instantiating Pairing-Based Protocols with Elliptic Curves of Embedding Degree One · IEEE Trans. Computers 2017
Fault Attacks on Pairing-Based Protocols Revisited · IEEE Trans. Computers 2015
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › public-key encryption
identity-based encryption
0.322017
On Instantiating Pairing-Based Protocols with Elliptic Curves of Embedding Degree One · IEEE Trans. Computers 2017
HIBE With Short Public Parameters Without Random Oracle · ASIACRYPT 2006
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
pairing-based cryptography
0.312017
On Instantiating Pairing-Based Protocols with Elliptic Curves of Embedding Degree One · IEEE Trans. Computers 2017
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography
digital signatures
0.212015
Type 2 Structure-Preserving Signature Schemes Revisited · ASIACRYPT (1) 2015
Hardware security and side channels
fault attacks
0.212015
Fault Attacks on Pairing-Based Protocols Revisited · IEEE Trans. Computers 2015
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key exchange
pairing protocols
0.212015
Fault Attacks on Pairing-Based Protocols Revisited · IEEE Trans. Computers 2015
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › encryption
property-preserving encryption
0.212015
Property Preserving Symmetric Encryption Revisited · ASIACRYPT (2) 2015
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography
public-key encryption
0.212015
Fault Attacks on Pairing-Based Protocols Revisited · IEEE Trans. Computers 2015
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures › pairing-based signatures
structure-preserving signatures
0.212015
Type 2 Structure-Preserving Signature Schemes Revisited · ASIACRYPT (1) 2015
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
symmetric cryptography
0.212015
Property Preserving Symmetric Encryption Revisited · ASIACRYPT (2) 2015
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › public-key encryption › identity-based encryption
hierarchical identity-based encryption
0.112006
HIBE With Short Public Parameters Without Random Oracle · ASIACRYPT 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

cost estimation · 0.3symmetric pairing analysis · 0.2fault injection · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Multi-splitting forking based modular security of signatures in multivariate quadratic setting
Sanjit Chatterjee, Tapas Pandit, Subhabrata Samajder
Des. Codes Cryptogr.1
2020 From Rerandomizability to Sequential Aggregation: Efficient Signature Schemes Based on SXDH Assumption
Sanjit Chatterjee, R. Kabaleeshwaran
ACISP1
2020 Efficient backward private searchable encryption
abstract
Dynamic Searchable Symmetric Encryption ([Formula: see text]), apart from providing support for search operation, allows a client to perform update operations on outsourced database efficiently. Two security properties, viz., forward privacy and backward privacy are desirable from a [Formula: see text] scheme. The former captures that the newly updated entries cannot be related to previous search queries and the latter ensures that search queries should not leak matching entries after they have been deleted. These security properties are formalized in terms of the information leakage that can be incurred by the respective constructions. Existing backward private constructions either have a non-optimal communication overhead or they make use of heavy cryptographic primitives. Our main contribution consists of two efficient backward private schemes [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] that aim to achieve practical efficiency by using light weight symmetric cryptographic components only. In the process, we also revisit the existing definitions of information leakage for backward privacy [Bost et al. (In ACM CCS ( 2017 ) 1465–1482 ACM Press)] and propose a relaxed formulation. [Formula: see text] is the first construction to achieve backward privacy in the general setting with optimal communication complexity. Our second construction, [Formula: see text], is the first single round-trip scheme achieving backward privacy in a restricted setting with optimal communication complexity using light weight symmetric cryptographic primitives. The prototype implementations of our schemes depict the practicability of the proposed constructions and indicate that the cost of achieving backward privacy over forward privacy is substantially small. The performance results also show that the proposed constructions outperform the currently most efficient scheme achieving backward privacy.
Sanjit Chatterjee, Shravan Kumar Parshuram Puria, Akash Shah
J. Comput. Secur.1
2019 Large Universe Subset Predicate Encryption Based on Static Assumption (Without Random Oracle)
Sanjit Chatterjee, Sayantan Mukherjee
CT-RSA1
2018 Towards Static Assumption Based Cryptosystem in Pairing Setting: Further Applications of DéjàQ and Dual-Form Signature (Extended Abstract)
Sanjit Chatterjee, R. Kabaleeshwaran
ProvSec1
2017 On Instantiating Pairing-Based Protocols with Elliptic Curves of Embedding Degree One
abstract
Since the discovery of identity-based encryption schemes in 2000, bilinear pairings have been used in the design of hundreds of cryptographic protocols. The most commonly used pairings are constructed from elliptic curves over finite fields with small embedding degree. These pairings can have different security, performance, and functionality characteristics, and were therefore classified into Types 1, 2, 3 and 4. In this paper, we observe that this conventional classification is not applicable to pairings from elliptic curves with embedding degree one. It is important to understand the security, efficiency, and functionality of these pairings in light of recent attacks on certain pairings constructed from elliptic curves with embedding degree greater than one. We define three kinds of pairings from elliptic curves with embedding degree one, discuss some subtleties with using them to implement pairing-based protocols, and provide an estimated cost of implementing them on modern processors.
Sanjit Chatterjee, Alfred Menezes, Francisco Rodríguez-Henríquez
IEEE Trans. Computers1
2016 A Closer Look at Multiple Forking: Leveraging (In)Dependence for a Tighter Bound
Sanjit Chatterjee, Chethan Kamath
Algorithmica1
2015 Property Preserving Symmetric Encryption Revisited
Sanjit Chatterjee, M. Prem Laxman Das
ASIACRYPT (2)1
2015 Type 2 Structure-Preserving Signature Schemes Revisited
Sanjit Chatterjee, Alfred Menezes
ASIACRYPT (1)1
2015 Fault Attacks on Pairing-Based Protocols Revisited
abstract
Several papers have studied fault attacks on computing a pairing value e(P,Q), where P is a public point and Q is a secret point. In this paper, we observe that these attacks are in fact effective only on a small number of pairing-based protocols, and that too only when the protocols are implemented with specific symmetric pairings. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the fault attacks on a public-key encryption scheme, an identity-based encryption scheme, and an oblivious transfer protocol when implemented with a symmetric pairing derived from a supersingular elliptic curve with embedding degree 2.
Sanjit Chatterjee, Koray Karabina, Alfred Menezes
IEEE Trans. Computers1
2011 A Generic Variant of NIST's KAS2 Key Agreement Protocol
Sanjit Chatterjee, Alfred Menezes, Berkant Ustaoglu
ACISP1
2011 On cryptographic protocols employing asymmetric pairings - The role of Ψ revisited
Sanjit Chatterjee, Alfred Menezes
Discret. Appl. Math.1
2010 On the Efficiency and Security of Pairing-Based Protocols in the Type 1 and Type 4 Settings
Sanjit Chatterjee, Darrel Hankerson, Alfred Menezes
WAIFI1
2010 Comparing two pairing-based aggregate signature schemes
Sanjit Chatterjee, Darrel Hankerson, Edward Knapp, Alfred Menezes
Des. Codes Cryptogr.1
2009 A New Protocol for the Nearby Friend Problem
Sanjit Chatterjee, Koray Karabina, Alfred Menezes
IMACC1
2007 Construction of a Hybrid HIBE Protocol Secure Against Adaptive Attacks
Palash Sarkar 0001, Sanjit Chatterjee
ProvSec2
2006 HIBE With Short Public Parameters Without Random Oracle
Sanjit Chatterjee, Palash Sarkar 0001
ASIACRYPT1