Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Felix Ming

dblp:82/9826 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Distributed systems · 100%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 54% Distributed computing theory · 46%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems › peer-to-peer systems
network construction
0.322012
Cosine-neighbourhood-refinement: Towards a robust network formation mechanism · INFOCOM 2012
"Who Are Your Friends?" - A Simple Mechanism that achieves perfect network formation · INFOCOM 2011
Distributed systems
peer-to-peer systems
0.322012
Cosine-neighbourhood-refinement: Towards a robust network formation mechanism · INFOCOM 2012
"Who Are Your Friends?" - A Simple Mechanism that achieves perfect network formation · INFOCOM 2011
Graph algorithms and graph theory › random graph models
planted partition model
0.012012
Cosine-neighbourhood-refinement: Towards a robust network formation mechanism · INFOCOM 2012
Distributed computing theory
distributed algorithms
0.012011
"Who Are Your Friends?" - A Simple Mechanism that achieves perfect network formation · INFOCOM 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mathematical analysis · 0.5cosine-neighbourhood refinement · 0.3chernoff bound · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Cosine-neighbourhood-refinement: Towards a robust network formation mechanism
abstract
In this paper we consider the classical network formation problem where nodes want to connect to other nodes that have similar “interests”. This problem is of fundamental importance in the network formation of peer-to-peer networks and online social networks. For this problem, we study whether there exists an algorithm that is robust with respect to the underlying interest graph that models the similarity of nodes in the networks. With robust, we mean that the algorithm is simple and achieves high-performance for a variety of interest graph models. The concrete interest graph models that we consider are the widely used planted partition and latent space model. We propose a network formation mechanism based on a cosine-neighbourhood refinement step and formally show that it performs well for the planted partition model. In addition, it can be shown that this mechanism based on cosine-neighbourhood refinement step also performs well under a latent space model for a one-dimensional sphere. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that a network formation mechanism has been shown to be robust and perform well for both the planted partition and latent space model. The proposed algorithm is simple and can be implemented in a distributed or centralized manner.
Felix Ming, Fai Wong, Peter Marbach
INFOCOM1
2011 "Who Are Your Friends?" - A Simple Mechanism that achieves perfect network formation
abstract
A fundamental challenge in peer-to-peer and online social networks is the design of a simple, distributed algorithm that allows users to discover, and connect to, peers who closely match their interests or preferences. In this paper, we consider an algorithm that is based on simple, local comparisons, and analyze it to provide insights into why similar peer discovery algorithms work well in practice. To do so, we use a mathematical framework to characterize the closeness of individual interests, and formally introduce the notion of a “perfect network formation” under the framework. Our analysis shows that the proposed algorithm indeeds achieves perfect network formation. Our analysis uses bounding techniques based on Chernoff bounds.
Felix Ming, Fai Wong, Peter Marbach
INFOCOM1