Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Steven Moran

dblp:82/9971 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
15ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 15 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › word segmentation
unsupervised word segmentation
0.412019
Is Word Segmentation Child's Play in All Languages? · ACL (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
word segmentation
0.412019
Is Word Segmentation Child's Play in All Languages? · ACL (1) 2019
Computational social science and digital humanities › psycholinguistics
language acquisition
0.112019
Is Word Segmentation Child's Play in All Languages? · ACL (1) 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

bottom-up segmentation · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Phonetic Segmentation of the UCLA Phonetics Lab Archive
abstract
Research in speech technologies and comparative linguistics depends on access to diverse and accessible speech data. The UCLA Phonetics Lab Archive is one of the earliest multilingual speech corpora, with long-form audio recordings and phonetic transcriptions for 314 languages (Ladefoged et al., 2009). Recently, 95 of these languages were time-aligned with word-level phonetic transcriptions (Li et al., 2021). Here we present VoxAngeles, a corpus of audited phonetic transcriptions and phone-level alignments of the UCLA Phonetics Lab Archive, which uses the 95-language CMU re-release as our starting point. VoxAngeles also includes word- and phone-level segmentations from the original UCLA corpus, as well as phonetic measurements of word and phone durations, vowel formants, and vowel f0. This corpus enhances the usability of the original data, particularly for quantitative phonetic typology, as demonstrated through a case study of vowel intrinsic f0. We also discuss the utility of the VoxAngeles corpus for general research and pedagogy in crosslinguistic phonetics, as well as for low-resource and multilingual speech technologies. VoxAngeles is free to download and use under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 license.
Eleanor Chodroff, Blaz Pazon, Annie Baker, Steven Moran
LREC/COLING4
2024 Converting Legacy Data to CLDF: A FAIR Exit Strategy for Linguistic Web Apps
abstract
In the mid 2000s, there were several large-scale US National Science Foundation (NSF) grants awarded to projects aiming at developing digital infrastructure and standards for different forms of linguistics data. For example, MultiTree encoded language family trees as phylogenies in XML and LL-MAP converted detailed geographic maps of endangered languages into KML. As early stand-alone website applications, these projects allowed researchers interested in comparative linguistics to explore language genealogies and areality, respectively. However as time passed, the technologies that supported these web apps became deprecated, unsupported, and inaccessible. Here we take a future-oriented approach to digital obsolescence and illustrate how to convert legacy linguistic resources into FAIR data via the Cross-Linguistic Data Formats (CLDF). CLDF is built on the W3C recommendations Model for Tabular Data and Metadata on the Web and Metadata Vocabulary for Tabular Data developed by the CSVW (CSV on the Web) working group. Thus, each dataset is modeled as a set of tabular data files described by metadata in JSON. These standards and the tools built to validate and manipulate them provide an accessible and extensible format for converting legacy linguistic web apps into FAIR datasets.
Robert Forkel, Daniel G. Swanson, Steven Moran
LREC/COLING3
2024 Temporal Co-Registration of Simultaneous Electromagnetic Articulography and Electroencephalography for Precise Articulatory and Neural Data Alignment
abstract
This study presents a temporal co-registration method combining electromagnetic articulography (EMA) and electroencephalography (EEG) to capture the neural planning and execution phases of speech with high precision. Traditional EEG alignment based on acoustic vocal onset is often inaccurate due to the variable lag between articulatory and acoustic onsets. Our approach synchronizes EMA-derived speech kinematics with EEG data, addressing these challenges. We also examined the interaction between EMA and EEG systems, focusing on the integrity of EMA signals in the presence of EEG equipment and the electromagnetic influence of EMA on EEG signal quality. The method achieved a mean alignment delay of 2.7 ms (SD = 0.4 ms), enabling detailed analysis of pre-articulatory brain activities. Additionally, our evaluations confirmed the robustness of EMA signals and EEG event-related potentials, supporting the method's precision, feasibility, and reliability for speech planning research.
Daniel Friedrichs, Monica Lancheros, Sam Kirkham, Lei He 0021, Clemens Lutz, Volker Dellwo, Steven Moran
INTERSPEECH8
2022 TeDDi Sample: Text Data Diversity Sample for Language Comparison and Multilingual NLP
abstract
We present the TeDDi sample, a diversity sample of text data for language comparison and multilingual Natural Language Processing. The TeDDi sample currently features 89 languages based on the typological diversity sample in the World Atlas of Language Structures. It consists of more than 20k texts and is accompanied by open-source corpus processing tools. The aim of TeDDi is to facilitate text-based quantitative analysis of linguistic diversity. We describe in detail the TeDDi sample, how it was created, data availability, and its added value through for NLP and linguistic research.
Steven Moran, Christian Bentz, Ximena Gutierrez-Vasques, Olga Pelloni, Tanja Samardzic
LREC1
2020 SegBo: A Database of Borrowed Sounds in the World's Language
Eitan Grossman, Elad Eisen, Dmitry Nikolaev 0002, Steven Moran
LREC4
2020 The ACQDIV Corpus Database and Aggregation Pipeline
abstract
We present the ACQDIV corpus database and aggregation pipeline, a tool developed as part of the European Research Council (ERC) funded project ACQDIV, which aims to identify the universal cognitive processes that allow children to acquire any language. The corpus database represents 15 corpora from 14 typologically maximally diverse languages. Here we give an overview of the project, database, and our extensible software package for adding more corpora to the current language sample. Lastly, we discuss how we use the corpus database to mine for universal patterns in child language acquisition corpora and we describe avenues for future research.
Anna Jancso, Steven Moran, Sabine Stoll
LREC2
2019 Is Word Segmentation Child's Play in All Languages?
abstract
When learning language, infants need to break down the flow of input speech into minimal word-like units, a process best described as unsupervised bottom-up segmentation.Proposed strategies include several segmentation algorithms, but only cross-linguistically robust algorithms could be plausible candidates for human word learning, since infants have no initial knowledge of the ambient language.We report on the stability in performance of 11 conceptually diverse algorithms on a selection of 8 typologically distinct languages.The results are evidence that some segmentation algorithms are cross-linguistically valid, thus could be considered as potential strategies employed by all infants.
Georgia-Rengina Loukatou, Steven Moran, Damián E. Blasi, Sabine Stoll, Alejandrina Cristià
ACL (1)2
2018 BDPROTO: A Database of Phonological Inventories from Ancient and Reconstructed Languages
Egidio Marsico, Sébastien Flavier, Annemarie Verkerk, Steven Moran
LREC4
2018 Towards faithfully visualizing global linguistic diversity
Garland McNew, Curdin Derungs, Steven Moran
LREC3
2018 Cross-linguistically Small World Networks are Ubiquitous in Child-directed Speech
Steven Moran, Danica Pajovic, Sabine Stoll
LREC1
2016 The Open Linguistics Working Group: Developing the Linguistic Linked Open Data Cloud
John P. McCrae, Christian Chiarcos, Francis Bond, Philipp Cimiano, Thierry Declerck, Gerard de Melo, Jorge Gracia, Sebastian Hellmann 0001, Bettina Klimek, Steven Moran, Petya Osenova, Antonio Pareja-Lora, Jonathan Pool
LREC10
2016 The ACQDIV Database: Min(d)ing the Ambient Language
Steven Moran
LREC1
2014 A Crowdsourcing Smartphone Application for Swiss German: Putting Language Documentation in the Hands of the Users
Jean-Philippe Goldman, Adrian Leemann, Marie-José Kolly, Ingrid Hove, Ibrahim Almajai, Volker Dellwo, Steven Moran
LREC7
2012 The Open Linguistics Working Group
Christian Chiarcos, Sebastian Hellmann 0001, Sebastian Nordhoff, Steven Moran, Richard Littauer, Judith Eckle-Kohler, Iryna Gurevych, Silvana Hartmann, Michael Matuschek, Christian M. Meyer
LREC4
2008 Lexicon Schemas and Related Data Models: when Standards Meet Users
Thorsten Trippel, Michael Maxwell, Greville Corbett, Cambell Prince, Christopher D. Manning, Stephen Grimes, Steven Moran
LREC7