Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lars George
dblp:83/10384
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 56% Data stream processing · 44% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data stream processing
complex event processing |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | IL-Miner: Instance-Level Discovery of Complex Event Patterns · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2016 |
Data mining › pattern mining › temporal pattern mining
event pattern mining |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | IL-Miner: Instance-Level Discovery of Complex Event Patterns · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2016 |
Data mining
pattern mining |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | IL-Miner: Instance-Level Discovery of Complex Event Patterns · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-phase discovery algorithm · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | IL-Miner: Instance-Level Discovery of Complex Event PatternsabstractComplex event processing (CEP) matches patterns over a continuous stream of events to detect situations of interest. Yet, the definition of an event pattern that precisely characterises a particular situation is challenging: there are manifold dimensions to correlate events, including time windows and value predicates. In the presence of historic event data that is labelled with the situation to detect, event patterns can be learned automatically. To cope with the combinatorial explosion of pattern candidates, existing approaches work on a type-level and discover patterns based on predefined event abstractions, aka event types. Hence, discovery is limited to patterns of a fixed granularity and users face the burden to manually select appropriate event abstractions. We present IL-M iner , a system that discovers event patterns by genuinely working on the instance-level, not assuming a priori knowledge on event abstractions. In a multi-phase process, IL-M iner first identifies relevant abstractions for the construction of event patterns. The set of events explored for pattern discovery is thereby reduced, while still providing formal guarantees on correctness, minimality, and completeness of the discovery result. Experiments using real-world datasets from diverse domains show that IL-M iner discovers a much broader range of event patterns compared to the state-of-the-art in the field. Lars George, Bruno Cadonna, Matthias Weidlich 0001 |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 1 |