Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lars George

dblp:83/10384 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 56% Data stream processing · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data stream processing
complex event processing
0.212016
IL-Miner: Instance-Level Discovery of Complex Event Patterns · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2016
Data mining › pattern mining › temporal pattern mining
event pattern mining
0.212016
IL-Miner: Instance-Level Discovery of Complex Event Patterns · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2016
Data mining
pattern mining
0.112016
IL-Miner: Instance-Level Discovery of Complex Event Patterns · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multi-phase discovery algorithm · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 IL-Miner: Instance-Level Discovery of Complex Event Patterns
abstract
Complex event processing (CEP) matches patterns over a continuous stream of events to detect situations of interest. Yet, the definition of an event pattern that precisely characterises a particular situation is challenging: there are manifold dimensions to correlate events, including time windows and value predicates. In the presence of historic event data that is labelled with the situation to detect, event patterns can be learned automatically. To cope with the combinatorial explosion of pattern candidates, existing approaches work on a type-level and discover patterns based on predefined event abstractions, aka event types. Hence, discovery is limited to patterns of a fixed granularity and users face the burden to manually select appropriate event abstractions. We present IL-M iner , a system that discovers event patterns by genuinely working on the instance-level, not assuming a priori knowledge on event abstractions. In a multi-phase process, IL-M iner first identifies relevant abstractions for the construction of event patterns. The set of events explored for pattern discovery is thereby reduced, while still providing formal guarantees on correctness, minimality, and completeness of the discovery result. Experiments using real-world datasets from diverse domains show that IL-M iner discovers a much broader range of event patterns compared to the state-of-the-art in the field.
Lars George, Bruno Cadonna, Matthias Weidlich 0001
Proc. VLDB Endow.1