Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Felix Klar

dblp:83/2201 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Requirements engineering and software design · 92% Software maintenance and evolution · 8%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
model-driven engineering
0.222008
Metamodel-based tool integration with moflon · ICSE 2008
Model transformation in the large · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2007
Requirements engineering and software design › model-driven engineering
graph transformation
0.112008
Metamodel-based tool integration with moflon · ICSE 2008
Requirements engineering and software design › model-driven engineering
metamodeling
0.112008
Metamodel-based tool integration with moflon · ICSE 2008
Requirements engineering and software design › computer-aided software engineering
tool integration
0.112008
Metamodel-based tool integration with moflon · ICSE 2008
Requirements engineering and software design › model-driven engineering
model transformation
0.112007
Model transformation in the large · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2007
Requirements engineering and software design › model-driven engineering › model transformation
model transformation languages
0.112007
Model transformation in the large · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2007
Software maintenance and evolution
software ecosystems
0.012008
Metamodel-based tool integration with moflon · ICSE 2008
Requirements engineering and software design › computer-aided software engineering
tool interoperability
0.012008
Metamodel-based tool integration with moflon · ICSE 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

triple graph grammars · 0.2metamodeling · 0.1graph transformation · 0.1QVT · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 15 Years of Triple Graph Grammars
Andy Schürr, Felix Klar
ICGT2
2008 Metamodel-based tool integration with moflon
abstract
Nowadays, a typical software development process involves many developers which participate in the development process by using a wide variety of development tools. As a consequence, the data representing the project as a whole is distributed over different development tools. For the purpose of consistency, maintainability, and traceability it is an essential task to be aware of the relationships between semantic equivalent data in different tool repositories. The real-time systems Lab at the Technische Universitat Darmstadt performs research in the area of tool and metamodel integration to provide solutions to overcome this gap. In this demonstration we present the metamodeling framework MOFLON that addresses these issues by bringing together the latest OMG standards with graph transformations and triple graph grammars. Using MOFLON, developers can generate code for specific tools needed to perform analysis and transformation on one development tool or to incrementally integrate data of different modeling tools.
Carsten Amelunxen, Felix Klar, Alexander Königs, Tobias Rötschke, Andy Schürr
ICSE2
2007 Model transformation in the large
abstract
Current rule-based model transformation approaches as the Query / View / Transformation (QVT) standard or Triple Graph Grammars (TGGs) disregard means for structuring model transformation specifications. As a result large scale model transformation specifications are hard to understand and to maintain. Furthermore, these specifications cannot utilize reusing mechanisms which would reduce the size of the specifications and improve their readability. In this paper we discuss how to transfer means for structuring huge metamodels and models as provided by common modeling languages to the world of model transformation languages. We focus on generalization issues as well as on package dependencies. As a result we come up with an extension to our TGG approach that enables the user to specify structured bidirectional model transformations in a declarative way.
Felix Klar, Alexander Königs, Andy Schürr
ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE1