Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Julian Hsu

dblp:83/2610 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2003
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Wireless networking · 33% Routing and switching · 33% Network performance modeling · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Wireless networking
mobile ad hoc networks
0.012000
A Performance Comparison Study of Ad Hoc Wireless Multicast Protocols · INFOCOM 2000
Routing and switching
multicast routing
0.012000
A Performance Comparison Study of Ad Hoc Wireless Multicast Protocols · INFOCOM 2000
Network performance modeling › protocol performance analysis
protocol performance comparison
0.012000
A Performance Comparison Study of Ad Hoc Wireless Multicast Protocols · INFOCOM 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.0comparative analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2003 Selecting a routing strategy for your ad hoc network
Sung-Ju Lee 0001, Julian Hsu, Russell Hayashida, Mario Gerla, Rajive L. Bagrodia
Comput. Commun.2
2000 A Performance Comparison Study of Ad Hoc Wireless Multicast Protocols
abstract
In this paper we investigate the performance of multicast routing protocols in wireless mobile ad hoc networks. An ad hoc network is composed of mobile nodes without the presence of a wired support infrastructure. In this environment, routing/multicasting protocols are faced with the challenge of producing multihop routes under host mobility and bandwidth constraints. In recent years, a number of new multicast protocols of different styles have been proposed for ad hoc networks. However, systematic performance evaluations and comparative analysis of these protocols in a common realistic environment has not yet been performed. In this study, we simulate a set of representative wireless ad hoc multicast protocols and evaluate them in various network scenarios. The relative strengths, weaknesses, and applicability of each multicast protocol to diverse situations are studied and discussed.
Sung-Ju Lee 0001, William Su, Julian Hsu, Mario Gerla, Rajive L. Bagrodia
INFOCOM3