Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kevin Kochanek

dblp:83/2785 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Coding theory · 75% Algorithms and data structures · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding
decoding algorithms
0.012001
Dynamic programming and the graphical representation of error-correcting codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2001
Algorithms and data structures
dynamic programming
0.012001
Dynamic programming and the graphical representation of error-correcting codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2001
Coding theory
error-correcting codes
0.012001
Dynamic programming and the graphical representation of error-correcting codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2001
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding › decoding algorithms › optimal decoding
maximum-likelihood decoding
0.012001
Dynamic programming and the graphical representation of error-correcting codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

dynamic programming · 0.0coarse-to-fine computation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 Dynamic programming and the graphical representation of error-correcting codes
abstract
Graphical representations of codes facilitate the design of computationally efficient decoding algorithms. This is an example of a general connection between dependency graphs, as arise in the representations of Markov random fields, and the dynamic programming principle. We concentrate on two computational tasks: finding the maximum-likelihood codeword and finding its posterior probability, given a signal received through a noisy channel. These two computations lend themselves to a particularly elegant version of dynamic programming, whereby the decoding complexity is particularly transparent. We explore some codes and some graphical representations designed specifically to facilitate computation. We further explore a coarse-to-fine version of dynamic programming that can produce an exact maximum-likelihood decoding many orders of magnitude faster than ordinary dynamic programming.
Stuart Geman, Kevin Kochanek
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2