Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Amir Helzer

dblp:83/501 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Geometric modeling and processing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Geometric modeling and processing › model fitting
curve and surface fitting
0.012004
Stable Fitting of 2D Curves and 3D Surfaces by Implicit Polynomials · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2004
Geometric modeling and processing › surface fitting
implicit polynomial fitting
0.012004
Stable Fitting of 2D Curves and 3D Surfaces by Implicit Polynomials · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2004
Geometric modeling and processing
shape representation
0.012004
Stable Fitting of 2D Curves and 3D Surfaces by Implicit Polynomials · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sensitivity analysis · 0.0error variance minimization · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 Stable Fitting of 2D Curves and 3D Surfaces by Implicit Polynomials
abstract
This work deals with fitting 2D and 3D implicit polynomials (IPs) to 2D curves and 3D surfaces, respectively. The zero-set of the polynomial is determined by the IP coefficients and describes the data. The polynomial fitting algorithms proposed in this paper aim at reducing the sensitivity of the polynomial to coefficient errors. Errors in coefficient values may be the result of numerical calculations, when solving the fitting problem or due to coefficient quantization. It is demonstrated that the effect of reducing this sensitivity also improves the fitting tightness and stability of the proposed two algorithms in fitting noisy data, as compared to existing algorithms like the well-known 3L and gradient-one algorithms. The development of the proposed algorithms is based on an analysis of the sensitivity of the zero-set to small coefficient changes and on minimizing a bound on the maximal error for one algorithm and minimizing the error variance for the second. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithms provide a significant reduction in fitting errors, particularly when fitting noisy data of complex shapes with high order polynomials, as compared to the performance obtained by the abovementioned existing algorithms.
Amir Helzer, Meir Barzohar, David Malah
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
2000 Robust Fitting of Implicit Polynomials with Quantized Coefficients to 2D Data
abstract
Presents an approach to contour representation and coding. It consists of an improved fitting of high-degree (4/sup th/ to 18/sup th/) implicit polynomials (IPs) to the contour which is robust to coefficient quantization. The proposed approach to solve the fitting problem is a modification of the 3L linear solution developed by Lei et al. (1997) and is more robust to noise and to coefficient quantization. We use an analytic approach to limit the maximal fitting error between each data point and the zero-set generated by the quantized polynomial coefficients. We than show that consideration of the quantization error (which led to a specific sensitivity criterion) also brought about a significant improvement in fitting IPs to noisy data, as compared to the 3L algorithm.
Amir Helzer, Meir Barzohar, David Malah
ICPR1