Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Balasubramanian Narasimhan
dblp:83/5090
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0001-5852-7639ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 93% Medical and health informatics · 7% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Parallel and multicore computing · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genome-wide association study |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Fast numerical optimization for genome sequencing data in population biobanks · Bioinform. 2021 |
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel computing |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Fast numerical optimization for genome sequencing data in population biobanks · Bioinform. 2021 |
Medical and health informatics › oncology
cancer detection |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Sample classification from protein mass spectrometry, by 'peak probability contrasts' · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
mass spectrometry proteomics |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Sample classification from protein mass spectrometry, by 'peak probability contrasts' · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
proteomics |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Sample classification from protein mass spectrometry, by 'peak probability contrasts' · Bioinform. 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
proximal gradient method · 1.0iteratively reweighted least squares · 1.0group lasso · 1.0lasso regression · 0.5LASSO regression · 0.5statistical classification · 0.0peak probability contrast · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Fast numerical optimization for genome sequencing data in population biobanksabstractMOTIVATION: Large-scale and high-dimensional genome sequencing data poses computational challenges. General-purpose optimization tools are usually not optimal in terms of computational and memory performance for genetic data. RESULTS: We develop two efficient solvers for optimization problems arising from large-scale regularized regressions on millions of genetic variants sequenced from hundreds of thousands of individuals. These genetic variants are encoded by the values in the set {0,1,2,NA}. We take advantage of this fact and use two bits to represent each entry in a genetic matrix, which reduces memory requirement by a factor of 32 compared to a double precision floating point representation. Using this representation, we implemented an iteratively reweighted least square algorithm to solve Lasso regressions on genetic matrices, which we name snpnet-2.0. When the dataset contains many rare variants, the predictors can be encoded in a sparse matrix. We utilize the sparsity in the predictor matrix to further reduce memory requirement and computational speed. Our sparse genetic matrix implementation uses both the compact two-bit representation and a simplified version of compressed sparse block format so that matrix-vector multiplications can be effectively parallelized on multiple CPU cores. To demonstrate the effectiveness of this representation, we implement an accelerated proximal gradient method to solve group Lasso on these sparse genetic matrices. This solver is named sparse-snpnet, and will also be included as part of snpnet R package. Our implementation is able to solve Lasso and group Lasso, linear, logistic and Cox regression problems on sparse genetic matrices that contain 1 000 000 variants and almost 100 000 individuals within 10 min and using less than 32GB of memory. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/rivas-lab/snpnet/tree/compact. Christopher Chang, Yosuke Tanigawa, Balasubramanian Narasimhan, Trevor J. Hastie, Robert Tibshirani, Manuel A. Rivas |
Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2004 | Sample classification from protein mass spectrometry, by 'peak probability contrasts'abstractMOTIVATION: Early cancer detection has always been a major research focus in solid tumor oncology. Early tumor detection can theoretically result in lower stage tumors, more treatable diseases and ultimately higher cure rates with less treatment-related morbidities. Protein mass spectrometry is a potentially powerful tool for early cancer detection. We propose a novel method for sample classification from protein mass spectrometry data. When applied to spectra from both diseased and healthy patients, the 'peak probability contrast' technique provides a list of all common peaks among the spectra, their statistical significance and their relative importance in discriminating between the two groups. We illustrate the method on matrix-assisted laser desorption and ionization mass spectrometry data from a study of ovarian cancers. RESULTS: Compared to other statistical approaches for class prediction, the peak probability contrast method performs as well or better than several methods that require the full spectra, rather than just labelled peaks. It is also much more interpretable biologically. The peak probability contrast method is a potentially useful tool for sample classification from protein mass spectrometry data. Robert Tibshirani, Trevor J. Hastie, Balasubramanian Narasimhan, Scott G. Soltys, Gongyi Shi, Albert C. Koong, Quynh-Thu Le |
Bioinform. | 3 |