Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Patricia Scully

dblp:83/5842 · also Patricia J. Scully · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0003-4785-2019ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Biometric security · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Wearable and physiological sensing · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Biometric security › biometric authentication
biometric verification
0.412019
Analysis of Spatio-Temporal Representations for Robust Footstep Recognition with Deep Residual Neural Networks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019
Biometric security
gait recognition
0.412019
Analysis of Spatio-Temporal Representations for Robust Footstep Recognition with Deep Residual Neural Networks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

spatio-temporal representation · 0.8deep residual neural network · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Analysis of Spatio-Temporal Representations for Robust Footstep Recognition with Deep Residual Neural Networks
abstract
Human footsteps can provide a unique behavioural pattern for robust biometric systems. We propose spatio-temporal footstep representations from floor-only sensor data in advanced computational models for automatic biometric verification. Our models deliver an artificial intelligence capable of effectively differentiating the fine-grained variability of footsteps between legitimate users (clients) and impostor users of the biometric system. The methodology is validated in the largest to date footstep database, containing nearly 20,000 footstep signals from more than 120 users. The database is organized by considering a large cohort of impostors and a small set of clients to verify the reliability of biometric systems. We provide experimental results in 3 critical data-driven security scenarios, according to the amount of footstep data made available for model training: at airports security checkpoints (smallest training set), workspace environments (medium training set) and home environments (largest training set). We report state-of-the-art footstep recognition rates with an optimal equal false acceptance and false rejection rate (equal error rate) of 0.7 percent an improvement ratio of 371 percent compared to previous state-of-the-art. We perform a feature analysis of deep residual neural networks showing effective clustering of client's footstep data and to provide insights of the feature learning process.
Omar Costilla-Reyes, Rubén Vera-Rodríguez, Patricia Scully, Krikor B. Ozanyan
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.3