Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Patricia Scully
dblp:83/5842 · also Patricia J. Scully
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0003-4785-2019ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Biometric security · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Wearable and physiological sensing · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Biometric security › biometric authentication
biometric verification |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Analysis of Spatio-Temporal Representations for Robust Footstep Recognition with Deep Residual Neural Networks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019 |
Biometric security
gait recognition |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Analysis of Spatio-Temporal Representations for Robust Footstep Recognition with Deep Residual Neural Networks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spatio-temporal representation · 0.8deep residual neural network · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Analysis of Spatio-Temporal Representations for Robust Footstep Recognition with Deep Residual Neural NetworksabstractHuman footsteps can provide a unique behavioural pattern for robust biometric systems. We propose spatio-temporal footstep representations from floor-only sensor data in advanced computational models for automatic biometric verification. Our models deliver an artificial intelligence capable of effectively differentiating the fine-grained variability of footsteps between legitimate users (clients) and impostor users of the biometric system. The methodology is validated in the largest to date footstep database, containing nearly 20,000 footstep signals from more than 120 users. The database is organized by considering a large cohort of impostors and a small set of clients to verify the reliability of biometric systems. We provide experimental results in 3 critical data-driven security scenarios, according to the amount of footstep data made available for model training: at airports security checkpoints (smallest training set), workspace environments (medium training set) and home environments (largest training set). We report state-of-the-art footstep recognition rates with an optimal equal false acceptance and false rejection rate (equal error rate) of 0.7 percent an improvement ratio of 371 percent compared to previous state-of-the-art. We perform a feature analysis of deep residual neural networks showing effective clustering of client's footstep data and to provide insights of the feature learning process. Omar Costilla-Reyes, Rubén Vera-Rodríguez, Patricia Scully, Krikor B. Ozanyan |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 3 |