Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Changxun Wu
dblp:83/6638
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 4 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
4 papers |
Storage systems · 42% Parallel and multicore computing · 30% Distributed systems · 10% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Parallel and multicore computing
load balancing |
0.2 | 3 | 2006 | Improving I/O Performance of Clustered Storage Systems by Adaptive Request Distribution · HPDC 2006 Tunable randomization for load management in shared-disk clusters · ACM Trans. Storage 2005 Handling Heterogeneity in Shared-Disk File Systems · SC 2003 |
Storage systems › distributed storage
storage cluster |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Improving I/O Performance of Clustered Storage Systems by Adaptive Request Distribution · HPDC 2006 |
Distributed systems
load management |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Tunable randomization for load management in shared-disk clusters · ACM Trans. Storage 2005 |
Storage systems › file systems › distributed file system › parallel file system
shared-disk file system |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Tunable randomization for load management in shared-disk clusters · ACM Trans. Storage 2005 |
GPUs and heterogeneous computing
heterogeneous cluster computing |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Achieving Performance Consistency in Heterogeneous Clusters · HPDC 2004 |
Storage systems › file systems
distributed file system |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Handling Heterogeneity in Shared-Disk File Systems · SC 2003 |
Storage systems
data redundancy |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Improving I/O Performance of Clustered Storage Systems by Adaptive Request Distribution · HPDC 2006 |
Storage systems › data redundancy
replication and erasure coding |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Improving I/O Performance of Clustered Storage Systems by Adaptive Request Distribution · HPDC 2006 |
High-performance computing
cluster computing |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Tunable randomization for load management in shared-disk clusters · ACM Trans. Storage 2005 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › datacenter infrastructure
heterogeneous servers |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Tunable randomization for load management in shared-disk clusters · ACM Trans. Storage 2005 |
Storage systems
file systems |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Handling Heterogeneity in Shared-Disk File Systems · SC 2003 |
Storage systems › file systems › distributed file system
metadata load balancing |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Handling Heterogeneity in Shared-Disk File Systems · SC 2003 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
adaptive non-uniform randomization · 0.1tunable hashing · 0.1adaptive load distribution · 0.1simulation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | Improving I/O Performance of Clustered Storage Systems by Adaptive Request DistributionabstractWe develop an adaptive load distribution protocol for logical volume I/O workload in clustered storage systems. It exploits data redundancy among decentralized storage servers to dynamically route I/O workload on a per-request basis, offering short-term load balancing and improved I/O performance. Our protocol builds on tunable hashing techniques and is based purely on client logic. Therefore, it does not limit system scalability and requires no change to the existing infrastructure. It distributes the I/O requests of a client to storage servers selected adoptively by a decentralized tunable hashing scheme, and, applies different policies to read and write requests. It also makes no assumption about inter-server communication latency and thus is robust to different network configurations. It supports both replication and erasure coding data redundancy schemes. Experimental results show that our protocol performs closely to a centralized load-balancing algorithm and verify the robustness of our protocol Changxun Wu, Randal C. Burns |
HPDC | 1 |
| 2005 | Tunable randomization for load management in shared-disk clustersabstractWe develop and evaluate a system for load management in shared-disk file systems built on clusters of heterogeneous computers. It balances workload by moving file sets among cluster server nodes. It responds to changing server resources that arise from failure and recovery, and dynamically adding or removing servers. It also realizes performance consistency---nearly uniform performance across all servers. The system is adaptive and self-tuning. It operates without any a priori knowledge of workload properties, or the capabilities of the servers. Rather, it continuously tunes load placement using a technique called adaptive, nonuniform (ANU) randomization. ANU randomization realizes the scalability and metadata reduction benefits of hash-based, randomized placement techniques, while avoiding hashing's drawbacks: load skew, inability to cope with heterogeneity, and lack of tunability. ANU randomization outperforms virtual-processor approaches to load balancing, while reducing the amount of shared state among servers and the amount of load movement. Changxun Wu, Randal C. Burns |
ACM Trans. Storage | 1 |
| 2004 | Achieving Performance Consistency in Heterogeneous Clusters
Changxun Wu, Randal C. Burns |
HPDC | 1 |
| 2003 | Handling Heterogeneity in Shared-Disk File SystemsabstractWe develop and evaluate a system for load management in shared-disk file systems built on clusters of heterogeneous computers. The system generalizes load balancing and server provisioning. It balances file metadata workload by moving file sets among cluster server nodes. It also responds to changing server resources that arise from failure and recovery and dynamically adding or removing servers. The system is adaptive and self-managing. It operates without any a-priori knowledge of workload properties or the capabilities of the servers. Rather, it continuously tunes load placement using a technique called adaptive, non-uniform (ANU) randomization. ANU randomization realizes the scalability and metadata reduction benefits of hash-based, randomized placement techniques. It also avoids hashing's drawbacks: load skew, inability to cope with heterogeneity, and lack of tunability. Simulation results show that our load-management algorithm performs comparably to a prescient algorithm. Changxun Wu, Randal C. Burns |
SC | 1 |