Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Joseph C. Kerekes

dblp:83/7118 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 61% Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 30% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip
optical network-on-chip
0.112009
Phastlane: a rapid transit optical routing network · ISCA 2009
Electronic design automation › physical design › routing
optical routing
0.112009
Phastlane: a rapid transit optical routing network · ISCA 2009
Electronic design automation › physical design
routing
0.112009
Phastlane: a rapid transit optical routing network · ISCA 2009
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
chip multiprocessor
0.012009
Phastlane: a rapid transit optical routing network · ISCA 2009
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Phastlane: a rapid transit optical routing network
abstract
Tens and eventually hundreds of processing cores are projected to be integrated onto future microprocessors, making the global interconnect a key component to achieving scalable chip performance within a given power envelope. While CMOS-compatible nanophotonics has emerged as a leading candidate for replacing global wires beyond the 22nm timeframe, on-chip optical interconnect architectures proposed thus far are either limited in scalability or are dependent on comparatively slow electrical control networks.
Mark J. Cianchetti, Joseph C. Kerekes, David H. Albonesi
ISCA2