EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Agnes Jonas
dblp:83/9684
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › classifier combination
ensemble classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Generalizing the Majority Voting Scheme to Spatially Constrained Voting · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2013 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
majority voting |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Generalizing the Majority Voting Scheme to Spatially Constrained Voting · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2013 |
Medical and health informatics › retinal image analysis
optic disc localization |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Generalizing the Majority Voting Scheme to Spatially Constrained Voting · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2013 |
Medical and health informatics
retinal image analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Generalizing the Majority Voting Scheme to Spatially Constrained Voting · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
ensemble learning · 0.3bayesian decision theory · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Generalizing the Majority Voting Scheme to Spatially Constrained VotingabstractGenerating ensembles from multiple individual classifiers is a popular approach to raise the accuracy of the decision. As a rule for decision making, majority voting is a usually applied model. In this paper, we generalize classical majority voting by incorporating probability terms pn,k to constrain the basic framework. These terms control whether a correct or false decision is made if k correct votes are present among the total number of n. This generalization is motivated by object detection problems, where the members of the ensemble are image processing algorithms giving their votes as pixels in the image domain. In this scenario, the terms pn,k can be specialized by a geometric constraint. Namely, the votes should fall inside a region matching the size and shape of the object to vote together. We give several theoretical results in this new model for both dependent and independent classifiers, whose individual accuracies may also differ. As a real world example, we present our ensemble-based system developed for the detection of the optic disc in retinal images. For this problem, experimental results are shown to demonstrate the characterization capability of this system. We also investigate how the generalized model can help us to improve an ensemble with extending it by adding a new algorithm. András Hajdu, Lajos Hajdu, Agnes Jonas, Laszlo Kovacs, Henrietta Tomán |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 3 |