Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Peva Blanchard

dblp:84/10265 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-9213-2331ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 2Theory of computation · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 40% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 30% Efficient and distributed learning · 20%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured prediction › ranking model
bradley-terry model
0.912025
Generalizing while preserving monotonicity in comparison-based preference learning models · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training
0.622017
Brief Announcement: Byzantine-Tolerant Machine Learning · PODC 2017
Machine Learning with Adversaries: Byzantine Tolerant Gradient Descent · NIPS 2017
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.312017
Brief Announcement: Byzantine-Tolerant Machine Learning · PODC 2017
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
diffusion prior
0.312025
Generalizing while preserving monotonicity in comparison-based preference learning models · NeurIPS 2025
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
byzantine fault tolerance
0.112017
Machine Learning with Adversaries: Byzantine Tolerant Gradient Descent · NIPS 2017
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.112017
Machine Learning with Adversaries: Byzantine Tolerant Gradient Descent · NIPS 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

embedding conditions · 0.9diffusion prior · 0.9stochastic gradient descent · 0.9gradient aggregation · 0.6krum aggregation · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Generalizing while preserving monotonicity in comparison-based preference learning models
abstract
If you tell a learning model that you prefer an alternative $a$ over another alternative $b$, then you probably expect the model to be *monotone*, that is, the valuation of $a$ increases, and that of $b$ decreases. Yet, perhaps surprisingly, many widely deployed comparison-based preference learning models, including large language models, fail to have this guarantee. Until now, the only comparison-based preference learning algorithms that were proved to be monotone are the Generalized Bradley-Terry models. Yet, these models are unable to generalize to uncompared data. In this paper, we advance the understanding of the set of models with generalization ability that are *monotone*. Namely, we propose a new class of Linear Generalized Bradley-Terry models with Diffusion Priors, and identify sufficient conditions on alternatives' embeddings that guarantee monotonicity. Our experiments show that this monotonicity is far from being a general guarantee, and that our new class of generalizing models improves accuracy, especially when the dataset is limited.
Julien Fageot, Peva Blanchard, Gilles Bareilles, Lê-Nguyên Hoang
NeurIPS2
2018 The entropy of a distributed computation random number generation from memory interleaving
Karolos Antoniadis, Peva Blanchard, Rachid Guerraoui, Julien Stainer
Distributed Comput.2
2017 Machine Learning with Adversaries: Byzantine Tolerant Gradient Descent
abstract
We study the resilience to Byzantine failures of distributed implementations of Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD). So far, distributed machine learning frameworks have largely ignored the possibility of failures, especially arbitrary (i.e., Byzantine) ones. Causes of failures include software bugs, network asynchrony, biases in local datasets, as well as attackers trying to compromise the entire system. Assuming a set of $n$ workers, up to $f$ being Byzantine, we ask how resilient can SGD be, without limiting the dimension, nor the size of the parameter space. We first show that no gradient aggregation rule based on a linear combination of the vectors proposed by the workers (i.e, current approaches) tolerates a single Byzantine failure. We then formulate a resilience property of the aggregation rule capturing the basic requirements to guarantee convergence despite $f$ Byzantine workers. We propose \emph{Krum}, an aggregation rule that satisfies our resilience property, which we argue is the first provably Byzantine-resilient algorithm for distributed SGD. We also report on experimental evaluations of Krum.
Peva Blanchard, El Mahdi El Mhamdi, Rachid Guerraoui, Julien Stainer
NIPS1
2017 Brief Announcement: Byzantine-Tolerant Machine Learning
abstract
We report on Krum, the first provably Byzantine-tolerant aggregation rule for distributed Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD). Krum guarantees the convergence of SGD even in a distributed setting where (asymptotically) up to half of the workers can be malicious adversaries trying to attack the learning system.
Peva Blanchard, El Mahdi El Mhamdi, Rachid Guerraoui, Julien Stainer
PODC1
2017 On the Smallest Grain of Salt to Get a Unique Identity
Peva Blanchard, Rachid Guerraoui
SIROCCO1
2016 On the Power of Oracle \varOmega ? for Self-Stabilizing Leader Election in Population Protocols
Joffroy Beauquier, Peva Blanchard, Janna Burman, Oksana Denysyuk
SSS2
2015 The Weakest Oracle for Symmetric Consensus in Population Protocols
Joffroy Beauquier, Peva Blanchard, Janna Burman, Shay Kutten
ALGOSENSORS2
2015 The Benefits of Entropy in Population Protocols
abstract
A distributed computing system can be viewed as the result of the interplay between a distributed algorithm specifying the effects of a local event (e.g. reception of a message), and an adversary choosing the interleaving (schedule) of these events in the execution. In the context of large networks of mobile pairwise interacting agents (population protocols), the adversary models the mobility of the agents by choosing the successive pairs of interacting agents. For some problems, assuming that the adversary selects the schedule according to some probability distribution greatly helps to devise (almost) correct solutions. But how much randomness is really necessary? To what extent does a problem admit implementations that are robust against a "not so random" schedule? This paper takes a first step in addressing this question by borrowing the concept of T-randomness, 0 <= T <= 1, from algorithmic information theory. Roughly speaking, the value T fixes the entropy rate of the considered schedules. For instance, the case T = 1 corresponds, in a specific sense, to schedules in which the pairs of interacting agents are chosen independently and uniformly (perfect randomness). The holy grail question can then be precisely stated as determining the optimal entropy rate to solve a given problem. We first show that perfect randomness is never required. Precisely, if a finite-state algorithm solves a problem with 1-randomness, then this algorithm still solves the same problem with T-randomness for some T < 1. Second, we illustrate how to compute bounds on the optimal entropy rate of a specific problem, namely the leader election problem.
Joffroy Beauquier, Peva Blanchard, Janna Burman, Rachid Guerraoui
OPODIS2
2013 Self-stabilizing Leader Election in Population Protocols over Arbitrary Communication Graphs
Joffroy Beauquier, Peva Blanchard, Janna Burman
OPODIS2
2013 Tight complexity analysis of population protocols with cover times - The ZebraNet example
Joffroy Beauquier, Peva Blanchard, Janna Burman, Sylvie Delaët
Theor. Comput. Sci.2
2011 Computing Time Complexity of Population Protocols with Cover Times - The ZebraNet Example
Joffroy Beauquier, Peva Blanchard, Janna Burman, Sylvie Delaët
SSS2