EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bence Pásztor
dblp:84/1334
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 5 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
3 papers |
Internet of things and sensor networks · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
environmental monitoring |
0.2 | 2 | 2010 | Evolution and sustainability of a wildlife monitoring sensor network · SenSys 2010 Wildlife and environmental monitoring using RFID and WSN technology · SenSys 2009 |
Internet of things and sensor networks › environmental sensing
wildlife monitoring |
0.2 | 2 | 2010 | Evolution and sustainability of a wildlife monitoring sensor network · SenSys 2010 Wildlife and environmental monitoring using RFID and WSN technology · SenSys 2009 |
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network › duty cycling
adaptive duty cycling |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Wildlife and environmental monitoring using RFID and WSN technology · SenSys 2009 |
Internet of things and sensor networks
sensor data management |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Wildlife and environmental monitoring using RFID and WSN technology · SenSys 2009 |
Internet of things and sensor networks › energy efficiency
sensor network energy management |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Wildlife and environmental monitoring using RFID and WSN technology · SenSys 2009 |
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
data collection |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Data collection in delay tolerant mobile sensor networks using SCAR · SenSys 2006 |
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
delay-tolerant sensor networks |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Data collection in delay tolerant mobile sensor networks using SCAR · SenSys 2006 |
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network
sensor deployment |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Evolution and sustainability of a wildlife monitoring sensor network · SenSys 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
deployment study · 0.1WSN · 0.1RFID · 0.1SCAR · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | WILDSENSING: Design and deployment of a sustainable sensor network for wildlife monitoringabstractThe increasing adoption of wireless sensor network technology in a variety of applications, from agricultural to volcanic monitoring, has demonstrated their ability to gather data with unprecedented sensing capabilities and deliver it to a remote user. However, a key issue remains how to maintain these sensor network deployments over increasingly prolonged deployments. In this article, we present the challenges that were faced in maintaining continual operation of an automated wildlife monitoring system over a one-year period. This system analyzed the social colocation patterns of European badgers ( Meles meles ) residing in a dense woodland environment using a hybrid RFID-WSN approach. We describe the stages of the evolutionary development, from implementation, deployment, and testing, to various iterations of software optimization, followed by hardware enhancements, which in turn triggered the need for further software optimization. We highlight the main lessons learned: the need to factor in the maintenance costs while designing the system; to consider carefully software and hardware interactions; the importance of rapid prototyping for initial deployment (this was key to our success); and the need for continuous interaction with domain scientists which allows for unexpected optimizations. Vladimir Dyo, Stephen A. Ellwood, David W. Macdonald, Andrew Markham, Agathoniki Trigoni, Ricklef Wohlers, Cecilia Mascolo, Bence Pásztor, Salvatore Scellato, Kharsim Yousef |
ACM Trans. Sens. Networks | 8 |
| 2010 | Selective Reprogramming of Mobile Sensor Networks through Social Community Detection
Bence Pásztor, Luca Mottola, Cecilia Mascolo, Gian Pietro Picco, Stephen A. Ellwood, David W. Macdonald |
EWSN | 1 |
| 2010 | Evolution and sustainability of a wildlife monitoring sensor networkabstractAs sensor network technologies become more mature, they are increasingly being applied to a wide variety of applications, ranging from agricultural sensing to cattle, oceanic and volcanic monitoring. Significant efforts have been made in deploying and testing sensor networks resulting in unprecedented sensing capabilities. A key challenge has become how to make these emerging wireless sensor networks more sustainable and easier to maintain over increasingly prolonged deployments. Vladimir Dyo, Stephen A. Ellwood, David W. Macdonald, Andrew Markham, Cecilia Mascolo, Bence Pásztor, Salvatore Scellato, Agathoniki Trigoni, Ricklef Wohlers, Kharsim Yousef |
SenSys | 6 |
| 2009 | Wildlife and environmental monitoring using RFID and WSN technologyabstractWireless Sensor Networks enable scientists to collect information about the environment with a granularity unseen before, while providing numerous challenges to software designers. Since sensor devices are often powered by small batteries, which take considerable effort to replace, it is of major importance to use energy carefully. We present two efficient ways of extending the lifetime of such systems: 1. an adaptive duty cycling protocol and 2. an adaptive data management protocol. Further, we present some details of our deployed sensor network in Wytham Woods, Oxfordshire. Vladimir Dyo, Stephen A. Ellwood, David W. Macdonald, Andrew Markham, Cecilia Mascolo, Bence Pásztor, Agathoniki Trigoni, Ricklef Wohlers |
SenSys | 6 |
| 2007 | Opportunistic Mobile Sensor Data Collection with SCARabstractSensors are now embedded in all sorts of devices (such as phones and PDAs) and attached to many moving things such as robots, vehicles and animals. The collection of data from these mobile sensors presents challenges related to the variability of the topology of the sensor network and the need to limit communication (for energy or bandwidth saving). Fortunately, the data collected, despite considerable, is often delay tolerant and its delivery to the sinks is, in most cases, not time critical. We have devised SCAR, a context aware opportunistic routing protocol which allows efficient routing of sensor data to sinks, through selection of best paths by prediction over movement patterns and current battery level of nodes. In this paper we present the implementation of the protocol in Contiki and validate the approach through the use of the COOJA simulator with mobility traces provided by the ZebraNet Project. We compare the performance with respect to random choice based dissemination. Bence Pásztor, Mirco Musolesi, Cecilia Mascolo |
MASS | 1 |
| 2006 | Data collection in delay tolerant mobile sensor networks using SCARabstractNo abstract available. Cecilia Mascolo, Mirco Musolesi, Bence Pásztor |
SenSys | 3 |