Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kevin K. Anderson

dblp:84/1863 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
0000-0001-5613-5893ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein analysis
protein-protein interaction
0.112008
A Bayesian estimator of protein-protein association probabilities · Bioinform. 2008
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
protein microarray data analysis
0.112006
ProMAT: protein microarray analysis tool · Bioinform. 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

bayesian estimation · 0.1statistical analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 A Bayesian estimator of protein-protein association probabilities
abstract
UNLABELLED: The Bayesian Estimator of Protein-Protein Association Probabilities (BEPro aff3) is a software tool for estimating probabilities of protein-protein association between bait and prey protein pairs using data from multiple-bait, multiple-replicate, protein liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry LC-MS/MS affinity isolation experiments. AVAILABILITY: BEPro (3) is public domain software, has been tested on WIndows XP, Linux and Mac OS, and is freely available from http://www.pnl.gov/statistics/BEPro3. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A user guide, example dataset with analysis and additional documentation are included with the BEPro (3) download.
Jason M. Gilmore, Deanna L. Auberry, Julia L. Sharp, Amanda M. White, Kevin K. Anderson, Don Simone Daly
Bioinform.5
2006 ProMAT: protein microarray analysis tool
abstract
SUMMARY: ProMAT is a software tool for statistically analyzing data from enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay microarray experiments. The software estimates standard curves, sample protein concentrations and their uncertainties for multiple assays. ProMAT generates a set of comprehensive figures for assessing results and diagnosing process quality. The tool is available for Windows or Mac, and is distributed as open-source Java and R code. AVAILABILITY: ProMAT is available at http://www.pnl.gov/statistics/ProMAT. ProMAT requires Java version 1.5.0 and R version 1.9.1 (or more recent versions). ProMAT requires either Windows XP or Mac OS 10.4 or newer versions.
Amanda M. White, Don Simone Daly, Susan M. Varnum, Kevin K. Anderson, Nikki Bollinger, Richard C. Zangar
Bioinform.4
2005 Evaluating concentration estimation errors in ELISA microarray experiments
abstract
BACKGROUND: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is a standard immunoassay to estimate a protein's concentration in a sample. Deploying ELISA in a microarray format permits simultaneous estimation of the concentrations of numerous proteins in a small sample. These estimates, however, are uncertain due to processing error and biological variability. Evaluating estimation error is critical to interpreting biological significance and improving the ELISA microarray process. Estimation error evaluation must be automated to realize a reliable high-throughput ELISA microarray system. In this paper, we present a statistical method based on propagation of error to evaluate concentration estimation errors in the ELISA microarray process. Although propagation of error is central to this method and the focus of this paper, it is most effective only when comparable data are available. Therefore, we briefly discuss the roles of experimental design, data screening, normalization, and statistical diagnostics when evaluating ELISA microarray concentration estimation errors. RESULTS: We use an ELISA microarray investigation of breast cancer biomarkers to illustrate the evaluation of concentration estimation errors. The illustration begins with a description of the design and resulting data, followed by a brief discussion of data screening and normalization. In our illustration, we fit a standard curve to the screened and normalized data, review the modeling diagnostics, and apply propagation of error. We summarize the results with a simple, three-panel diagnostic visualization featuring a scatterplot of the standard data with logistic standard curve and 95% confidence intervals, an annotated histogram of sample measurements, and a plot of the 95% concentration coefficient of variation, or relative error, as a function of concentration. CONCLUSIONS: This statistical method should be of value in the rapid evaluation and quality control of high-throughput ELISA microarray analyses. Applying propagation of error to a variety of ELISA microarray concentration estimation models is straightforward. Displaying the results in the three-panel layout succinctly summarizes both the standard and sample data while providing an informative critique of applicability of the fitted model, the uncertainty in concentration estimates, and the quality of both the experiment and the ELISA microarray process.
Don Simone Daly, Amanda M. White, Susan M. Varnum, Kevin K. Anderson, Richard C. Zangar
BMC Bioinform.4