Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrea Frome

dblp:84/2426 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Image recognition and object detection · 40% Vision and language · 16% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 16%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Geometric modeling and processing · 100%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
object classification
0.212014
Large-Scale Object Classification Using Label Relation Graphs · ECCV (1) 2014
Computer vision › Vision and language › cross-modal alignment
visual-semantic embedding
0.212013
DeViSE: A Deep Visual-Semantic Embedding Model · NIPS 2013
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › zero-shot learning
zero-shot classification
0.212013
DeViSE: A Deep Visual-Semantic Embedding Model · NIPS 2013
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.122007
Learning Globally-Consistent Local Distance Functions for Shape-Based Image Retrieval and Classification · ICCV 2007
Image Retrieval and Classification Using Local Distance Functions · NIPS 2006
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face detection
0.112009
Large-scale privacy protection in Google Street View · ICCV 2009
Privacy and data protection
image privacy
0.112009
Large-scale privacy protection in Google Street View · ICCV 2009
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
metric learning
0.112007
Learning Globally-Consistent Local Distance Functions for Shape-Based Image Retrieval and Classification · ICCV 2007
Information retrieval › image retrieval
shape retrieval
0.112007
Learning Globally-Consistent Local Distance Functions for Shape-Based Image Retrieval and Classification · ICCV 2007
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image retrieval
0.112006
Image Retrieval and Classification Using Local Distance Functions · NIPS 2006
Geometric modeling and processing
point cloud processing
0.012004
Recognizing Objects in Range Data Using Regional Point Descriptors · ECCV (3) 2004
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
false positive reduction
0.012009
Large-scale privacy protection in Google Street View · ICCV 2009
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
feature weighting
0.012007
Learning Globally-Consistent Local Distance Functions for Shape-Based Image Retrieval and Classification · ICCV 2007
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › metric learning
local distance function
0.012007
Learning Globally-Consistent Local Distance Functions for Shape-Based Image Retrieval and Classification · ICCV 2007
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d object recognition
range image object recognition
0.012004
Recognizing Objects in Range Data Using Regional Point Descriptors · ECCV (3) 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sliding-window detection · 0.2structured classification · 0.2label relation graphs · 0.2semantic knowledge transfer · 0.2deep embedding · 0.2large-margin metric learning · 0.1shape matching · 0.1point feature descriptors · 0.1patch-based visual features · 0.1local distance function learning · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Large-Scale Object Classification Using Label Relation Graphs
Jia Deng 0001, Nan Ding 0002, Yangqing Jia, Andrea Frome, Kevin Murphy 0002, Samy Bengio, Hartmut Neven, Hartwig Adam
ECCV (1)4
2013 DeViSE: A Deep Visual-Semantic Embedding Model
abstract
Modern visual recognition systems are often limited in their ability to scale to large numbers of object categories. This limitation is in part due to the increasing difficulty of acquiring sufficient training data in the form of labeled images as the number of object categories grows. One remedy is to leverage data from other sources -- such as text data -- both to train visual models and to constrain their predictions. In this paper we present a new deep visual-semantic embedding model trained to identify visual objects using both labeled image data as well as semantic information gleaned from unannotated text. We demonstrate that this model matches state-of-the-art performance on the 1000-class ImageNet object recognition challenge while making more semantically reasonable errors, and also show that the semantic information can be exploited to make predictions about tens of thousands of image labels not observed during training. Semantic knowledge improves such zero-shot predictions by up to 65%, achieving hit rates of up to 10% across thousands of novel labels never seen by the visual model.
Andrea Frome, Gregory S. Corrado, Jonathon Shlens, Samy Bengio, Jeffrey Dean, Marc'Aurelio Ranzato, Tomás Mikolov
NIPS1
2009 Large-scale privacy protection in Google Street View
abstract
The last two years have witnessed the introduction and rapid expansion of products based upon large, systematically-gathered, street-level image collections, such as Google Street View, EveryScape, and Mapjack. In the process of gathering images of public spaces, these projects also capture license plates, faces, and other information considered sensitive from a privacy standpoint. In this work, we present a system that addresses the challenge of automatically detecting and blurring faces and license plates for the purpose of privacy protection in Google Street View. Though some in the field would claim face detection is “solved”, we show that state-of-the-art face detectors alone are not sufficient to achieve the recall desired for large-scale privacy protection. In this paper we present a system that combines a standard sliding-window detector tuned for a high recall, low-precision operating point with a fast post-processing stage that is able to remove additional false positives by incorporating domain-specific information not available to the sliding-window detector. Using a completely automatic system, we are able to sufficiently blur more than 89% of faces and 94 - 96% of license plates in evaluation sets sampled from Google Street View imagery.
Andrea Frome, German Cheung, Ahmad Abdulkader, Marco Zennaro, Bo Wu 0001, Alessandro Bissacco, Hartwig Adam, Hartmut Neven, Luc Vincent
ICCV1
2007 Learning Globally-Consistent Local Distance Functions for Shape-Based Image Retrieval and Classification
abstract
We address the problem of visual category recognition by learning an image-to-image distance function that attempts to satisfy the following property: the distance between images from the same category should be less than the distance between images from different categories. We use patch-based feature vectors common in object recognition work as a basis for our image-to-image distance functions. Our large-margin formulation for learning the distance functions is similar to formulations used in the machine learning literature on distance metric learning, however we differ in that we learn local distance functions-a different parameterized function for every image of our training set-whereas typically a single global distance function is learned. This was a novel approach first introduced in Frome, Singer, & Malik, NIPS 2006. In that work we learned the local distance functions independently, and the outputs of these functions could not be compared at test time without the use of additional heuristics or training. Here we introduce a different approach that has the advantage that it learns distance functions that are globally consistent in that they can be directly compared for purposes of retrieval and classification. The output of the learning algorithm are weights assigned to the image features, which is intuitively appealing in the computer vision setting: some features are more salient than others, and which are more salient depends on the category, or image, being considered. We train and test using the Caltech 101 object recognition benchmark.
Andrea Frome, Yoram Singer, Fei Sha, Jitendra Malik
ICCV1
2006 Image Retrieval and Classification Using Local Distance Functions
abstract
In this paper we introduce and experiment with a framework for learning local perceptual distance functions for visual recognition. We learn a distance function for each training image as a combination of elementary distances between patch-based visual features. We apply these combined local distance functions to the tasks of image retrieval and classification of novel images. On the Caltech 101 object recognition benchmark, we achieve 60.3% mean recognition across classes using 15 training images per class, which is better than the best published performance by Zhang, et al.
Andrea Frome, Yoram Singer, Jitendra Malik
NIPS1
2004 Recognizing Objects in Range Data Using Regional Point Descriptors
Andrea Frome, Daniel Huber, Ravi Kolluri, Thomas Bülow, Jitendra Malik
ECCV (3)1