Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrea Frome
dblp:84/2426
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 3 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Image recognition and object detection · 40% Vision and language · 16% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 16% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Geometric modeling and processing · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
object classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Large-Scale Object Classification Using Label Relation Graphs · ECCV (1) 2014 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › cross-modal alignment
visual-semantic embedding |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | DeViSE: A Deep Visual-Semantic Embedding Model · NIPS 2013 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › zero-shot learning
zero-shot classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | DeViSE: A Deep Visual-Semantic Embedding Model · NIPS 2013 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.1 | 2 | 2007 | Learning Globally-Consistent Local Distance Functions for Shape-Based Image Retrieval and Classification · ICCV 2007 Image Retrieval and Classification Using Local Distance Functions · NIPS 2006 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Large-scale privacy protection in Google Street View · ICCV 2009 |
Privacy and data protection
image privacy |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Large-scale privacy protection in Google Street View · ICCV 2009 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
metric learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Learning Globally-Consistent Local Distance Functions for Shape-Based Image Retrieval and Classification · ICCV 2007 |
Information retrieval › image retrieval
shape retrieval |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Learning Globally-Consistent Local Distance Functions for Shape-Based Image Retrieval and Classification · ICCV 2007 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image retrieval |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Image Retrieval and Classification Using Local Distance Functions · NIPS 2006 |
Geometric modeling and processing
point cloud processing |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Recognizing Objects in Range Data Using Regional Point Descriptors · ECCV (3) 2004 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
false positive reduction |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Large-scale privacy protection in Google Street View · ICCV 2009 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
feature weighting |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Learning Globally-Consistent Local Distance Functions for Shape-Based Image Retrieval and Classification · ICCV 2007 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › metric learning
local distance function |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Learning Globally-Consistent Local Distance Functions for Shape-Based Image Retrieval and Classification · ICCV 2007 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d object recognition
range image object recognition |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Recognizing Objects in Range Data Using Regional Point Descriptors · ECCV (3) 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sliding-window detection · 0.2structured classification · 0.2label relation graphs · 0.2semantic knowledge transfer · 0.2deep embedding · 0.2large-margin metric learning · 0.1shape matching · 0.1point feature descriptors · 0.1patch-based visual features · 0.1local distance function learning · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Large-Scale Object Classification Using Label Relation Graphs
Jia Deng 0001, Nan Ding 0002, Yangqing Jia, Andrea Frome, Kevin Murphy 0002, Samy Bengio, Hartmut Neven, Hartwig Adam |
ECCV (1) | 4 |
| 2013 | DeViSE: A Deep Visual-Semantic Embedding ModelabstractModern visual recognition systems are often limited in their ability to scale to large numbers of object categories. This limitation is in part due to the increasing difficulty of acquiring sufficient training data in the form of labeled images as the number of object categories grows. One remedy is to leverage data from other sources -- such as text data -- both to train visual models and to constrain their predictions. In this paper we present a new deep visual-semantic embedding model trained to identify visual objects using both labeled image data as well as semantic information gleaned from unannotated text. We demonstrate that this model matches state-of-the-art performance on the 1000-class ImageNet object recognition challenge while making more semantically reasonable errors, and also show that the semantic information can be exploited to make predictions about tens of thousands of image labels not observed during training. Semantic knowledge improves such zero-shot predictions by up to 65%, achieving hit rates of up to 10% across thousands of novel labels never seen by the visual model. Andrea Frome, Gregory S. Corrado, Jonathon Shlens, Samy Bengio, Jeffrey Dean, Marc'Aurelio Ranzato, Tomás Mikolov |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2009 | Large-scale privacy protection in Google Street ViewabstractThe last two years have witnessed the introduction and rapid expansion of products based upon large, systematically-gathered, street-level image collections, such as Google Street View, EveryScape, and Mapjack. In the process of gathering images of public spaces, these projects also capture license plates, faces, and other information considered sensitive from a privacy standpoint. In this work, we present a system that addresses the challenge of automatically detecting and blurring faces and license plates for the purpose of privacy protection in Google Street View. Though some in the field would claim face detection is “solved”, we show that state-of-the-art face detectors alone are not sufficient to achieve the recall desired for large-scale privacy protection. In this paper we present a system that combines a standard sliding-window detector tuned for a high recall, low-precision operating point with a fast post-processing stage that is able to remove additional false positives by incorporating domain-specific information not available to the sliding-window detector. Using a completely automatic system, we are able to sufficiently blur more than 89% of faces and 94 - 96% of license plates in evaluation sets sampled from Google Street View imagery. Andrea Frome, German Cheung, Ahmad Abdulkader, Marco Zennaro, Bo Wu 0001, Alessandro Bissacco, Hartwig Adam, Hartmut Neven, Luc Vincent |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2007 | Learning Globally-Consistent Local Distance Functions for Shape-Based Image Retrieval and ClassificationabstractWe address the problem of visual category recognition by learning an image-to-image distance function that attempts to satisfy the following property: the distance between images from the same category should be less than the distance between images from different categories. We use patch-based feature vectors common in object recognition work as a basis for our image-to-image distance functions. Our large-margin formulation for learning the distance functions is similar to formulations used in the machine learning literature on distance metric learning, however we differ in that we learn local distance functions-a different parameterized function for every image of our training set-whereas typically a single global distance function is learned. This was a novel approach first introduced in Frome, Singer, & Malik, NIPS 2006. In that work we learned the local distance functions independently, and the outputs of these functions could not be compared at test time without the use of additional heuristics or training. Here we introduce a different approach that has the advantage that it learns distance functions that are globally consistent in that they can be directly compared for purposes of retrieval and classification. The output of the learning algorithm are weights assigned to the image features, which is intuitively appealing in the computer vision setting: some features are more salient than others, and which are more salient depends on the category, or image, being considered. We train and test using the Caltech 101 object recognition benchmark. Andrea Frome, Yoram Singer, Fei Sha, Jitendra Malik |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2006 | Image Retrieval and Classification Using Local Distance FunctionsabstractIn this paper we introduce and experiment with a framework for learning local perceptual distance functions for visual recognition. We learn a distance function for each training image as a combination of elementary distances between patch-based visual features. We apply these combined local distance functions to the tasks of image retrieval and classification of novel images. On the Caltech 101 object recognition benchmark, we achieve 60.3% mean recognition across classes using 15 training images per class, which is better than the best published performance by Zhang, et al. Andrea Frome, Yoram Singer, Jitendra Malik |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2004 | Recognizing Objects in Range Data Using Regional Point Descriptors
Andrea Frome, Daniel Huber, Ravi Kolluri, Thomas Bülow, Jitendra Malik |
ECCV (3) | 1 |