Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ben L. Di Vito

dblp:84/4357 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 2 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
3 papers
Requirements engineering and software design · 55% Program verification · 24% Operating systems · 21%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 87% Embedded and real-time systems · 13%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
formal specification
0.011998
Formalizing Space Shuttle Software Requirements: Four Case Studies · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 1998
Requirements engineering and software design
requirements analysis
0.011998
Formalizing Space Shuttle Software Requirements: Four Case Studies · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 1998
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
majority voting
0.011992
Provable transient recovery for frame-based, fault-tolerant computing systems · RTSS 1992
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › error recovery
transient fault recovery
0.011992
Provable transient recovery for frame-based, fault-tolerant computing systems · RTSS 1992
Program verification › system verification
kernel verification
0.021990
Specification and Verification of the ASOS Kernel · S&P 1990
The Deductive Theory Manager: A Knowledge Based System for Formal Verification · S&P 1990
Operating systems › system security › operating system security
secure operating system
0.021990
Specification and Verification of the ASOS Kernel · S&P 1990
The Deductive Theory Manager: A Knowledge Based System for Formal Verification · S&P 1990
Operating systems › system security
multilevel security
0.011990
Specification and Verification of the ASOS Kernel · S&P 1990
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time control
0.011992
Provable transient recovery for frame-based, fault-tolerant computing systems · RTSS 1992

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

formal specification · 0.0state exploration · 0.0formal verification · 0.0EHDM · 0.0proof · 0.0knowledge base · 0.0case study · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 High-automation proofs for properties of requirements models
Ben L. Di Vito
Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf.1
1998 Formalizing Space Shuttle Software Requirements: Four Case Studies
abstract
This article describes four case studies in which requirements for new flight software subsystems on NASA's Space Shuttle were analyzed using mechanically supported formal methods. Three of the studies used standard formal specification and verification techniques, and the fourth used state exploration. These applications illustrate two thesis: (1) formal methods complement conventional requirements analysis processes effectively and (2) formal methods confer benefits even when only selectively adopted and applied. The studies also illustrate the interplay of application maturity level and formal methods strategy, especially in areas such as technology transfer, legacy applications, and rapid formalization, and they raise interesting issues in problem domain modeling and in tailoring formal techniques to applications.
Judith Crow, Ben L. Di Vito
ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol.2
1992 Provable transient recovery for frame-based, fault-tolerant computing systems
abstract
A formal verification of the transient fault recovery aspects of the Reliable Computing Platform (RCP), a fault-tolerant computing system architecture for digital flight control applications, is described. The RCP uses NMR-style redundancy to mask faults and internal majority voting to purge the effects of transient faults. The system design has been formally specified and verified using the EHDM verification system. The present formalization accommodates a wide variety of voting schemes for purging the effects of transients.>
Ben L. Di Vito, Ricky W. Butler
RTSS1
1990 The Deductive Theory Manager: A Knowledge Based System for Formal Verification
abstract
Formal verification tools and techniques are difficult and expensive to apply. To make verification of large, complex systems more practical, TRW is developing the deductive theory manager (DTM). A knowledge-based tool that integrates with the Gypsy verification environment (GVE), the DTM supports the construction of deductive theories and applies them to proofs. Knowledge bases applicable to a variety of projects, and one specific to the army secure operating system (ASOS) proofs, are simultaneously under development. The authors describe the underlying philosophy of the verification strategy on which the DTM is based, present the DTM architecture, and illustrate DTM knowledge engineering and proof processing with a case study.>
Ben L. Di Vito, Cristi Garvey, D. Kwong, A. Murray, Jane Solomon, Amy Wu
S&P1
1990 Specification and Verification of the ASOS Kernel
abstract
The Army Secure Operating System (ASOS) program is providing a family of operating systems for tactical data system applications in Ada. Two members of the ASOS family have been developed: a dedicated secure operating system intended for the TCSEC (the DoD Trusted Computer System Evaluation Criteria) C2 level, and a multilevel secure operating system intended for the TCSEC A1 level. An overview is presented of the A1 system concept and TRW's solution to the ASOS kernel verification problem. A description is given of the model, the formal top-level specification :(FTLS), and proof approaches as well as some practical techniques for coping with proof complexity. Summary statistics on the actual proofs have been compiled and included in the discussion of the verification results.>
Ben L. Di Vito, Paul H. Palmquist, E. R. Anderson 0001, Michael L. Johnston
S&P1