Memory disaggregation allows applications running on compute servers to expand their pool of available memory capacity by leveraging remote resources through low-latency networks. Unfortunately, in existing software-level disaggregation frameworks, the simple act of issuing requests to remote memory---paid on every access---can consume many CPU cycles. This overhead represents a direct cost to disaggregation, not only on the throughput of remote memory access but also on application logic, which must contend with the framework's CPU overheads.

Recent proposals for the disaggregation of compute, memory, storage, and accelerators in data centers promise substantial operational benefits. Unfortunately, for resources like memory, this comes at the cost of performance overhead due to the potential insertion of network latency into every load and store operation. This effect is particularly felt by data-intensive systems due to the size of their working sets, the frequency at which they need to access memory, and the relatively low computation per access. This performance impairment offsets the elasticity benefit of disaggregated memory. This paper presents TELEPORT, a compute pushdown framework for data-intensive systems that run on disaggregated architectures; compared to prior work on compute pushdown, TELEPORT is unique in its efficiency and flexibility. We have developed optimization prin- ciples for several popular systems including a columnar in-memory DBMS, a graph processing system, and a MapReduce system. The evaluation results show that using TELEPORT to push down simple operators improves the performance of these systems on state-of-the-art disaggregated OSes by an order of magnitude, thus fully exploiting the elasticity of disaggregated data centers.

Resource disaggregation is a new architecture for data centers in which resources like memory and storage are decoupled from the CPU, managed independently, and connected through a high-speed network. Recent work has shown that although disaggregated data centers (DDCs) provide operational benefits, applications running on DDCs experience degraded performance due to extra network latency between the CPU and their working sets in main memory. DBMSs are an interesting case study for DDCs for two main reasons: (1) DBMSs normally process data-intensive workloads and require data movement between different resource components; and (2) disaggregation drastically changes the assumption that DBMSs can rely on their own internal resource management. We take the first step to thoroughly evaluate the query execution performance of production DBMSs in disaggregated data centers. We evaluate two popular open-source DBMSs (MonetDB and PostgreSQL) and test their performance with the TPC-H benchmark in a recently released operating system for resource disaggregation. We evaluate these DBMSs with various configurations and compare their performance with that of single-machine Linux with the same hardware resources. Our results confirm that significant performance degradation does occur, but, perhaps surprisingly, we also find settings in which the degradation is minor or where DDCs actually improve performance.