Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xinyi Chen 0005

dblp:84/6214-5 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0001-9682-5829ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 88% Multi-agent systems · 12%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
multi-agent text generation
1.012026
LiRA: A Multi-Agent Framework for Reliable and Readable Literature Review Generation · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding
multimodal language understanding
0.712023
The BLA Benchmark: Investigating Basic Language Abilities of Pre-Trained Multimodal Models · EMNLP 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
multi-agent collaboration
0.312026
LiRA: A Multi-Agent Framework for Reliable and Readable Literature Review Generation · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multi-agent workflow · 1.0large language model · 1.0zero-shot evaluation · 0.7in-context learning · 0.7fine-tuning · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 LiRA: A Multi-Agent Framework for Reliable and Readable Literature Review Generation
abstract
The rapid growth of scientific publications has made it increasingly difficult to keep literature reviews comprehensive and up-to-date. Though prior work has focused on automating retrieval and screening, the writing phase of systematic reviews remains largely under-explored, especially with regard to readability and factual accuracy. To address this, we present LiRA (Literature Review Agents), a multi-agent collaborative workflow which emulates the human literature review process. LiRA utilizes specialized agents for content outlining, subsection writing, editing, and reviewing, producing cohesive and comprehensive review articles. Evaluated on SciReviewGen and a proprietary ScienceDirect dataset, LiRA outperforms current baselines such as AutoSurvey and MASS-Survey in writing and citation quality, while maintaining competitive similarity to human-written reviews. We further evaluate LiRA in real-world scenarios using document retrieval and assess its robustness to reviewer model variation. Our findings highlight the potential of agentic LLM workflows, even without domain-specific tuning, to improve the reliability and usability of automated scientific writing.
Gregory Hok Tjoan Go, Khang Ly, Anders Søgaard, Seyed Amin Tabatabaei, Maarten de Rijke, Xinyi Chen 0005
AAAI6
2023 The BLA Benchmark: Investigating Basic Language Abilities of Pre-Trained Multimodal Models
abstract
Despite the impressive performance achieved by pre-trained language-and-vision models in downstream tasks, it remains an open question whether this reflects a proper understanding of image-text interaction.In this work, we explore to what extent they handle basic linguistic constructions-active-passive voice, coordination, and relative clauses-that even preschool children can typically master.We present BLA, a novel, automatically constructed benchmark to evaluate multimodal models on these Basic Language Abilities.We show that different types of Transformer-based systems, such as CLIP, ViLBERT, and BLIP2, generally struggle with BLA in a zero-shot setting, in line with previous findings.Our experiments, in particular, show that most of the tested models only marginally benefit when fine-tuned or prompted with construction-specific samples.Yet, the generative BLIP2 shows promising trends, especially in an in-context learning setting.This opens the door to using BLA not only as an evaluation benchmark but also to improve models' basic language abilities.
Xinyi Chen 0005, Raquel Fernández, Sandro Pezzelle
EMNLP1