Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexander Finder

dblp:84/8186 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 6 · 3 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Electronic design automation · 84% Performance modeling and evaluation · 16%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.322014
Latency Analysis for Sequential Circuits · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2014
Automated feature localization for hardware designs using coverage metrics · DAC 2012
Performance modeling and evaluation
delay analysis
0.212014
Latency Analysis for Sequential Circuits · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2014
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification
0.212014
A Simulation-Based Approach for Automated Feature Localization · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2014
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › formal verification
sequential circuit verification
0.212014
Latency Analysis for Sequential Circuits · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2014
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › coverage analysis
coverage metrics
0.112012
Automated feature localization for hardware designs using coverage metrics · DAC 2012
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
coverage-driven verification
0.012012
Automated feature localization for hardware designs using coverage metrics · DAC 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation-based analysis · 0.2heuristic algorithm · 0.2exact algorithm · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Latency Analysis for Sequential Circuits
abstract
Verifying correctness is a major bottleneck in today's circuit and system design. Verification includes the tasks of error detection, error localization, and error correction in an implemented design, as well as the analysis and avoidance of transient faults. For all those tasks, knowing when an assignment to signals becomes observable at the outputs and for how long it influences the system is important. In this letter, we propose a minimal and maximal latency measure for sequential circuits. This measure explains how long a circuit's state and outputs depend on input stimuli. Exact and heuristic algorithms are discussed to determine the measure. We evaluate the algorithms on state-of-the-art designs. Experimental results show how the measure provides insight into the behavior of circuit designs.
Alexander Finder, André Sülflow, Görschwin Fey
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.1
2014 A Simulation-Based Approach for Automated Feature Localization
abstract
The complexity of modern chips is rapidly increasing. To fulfill tight time-to-market constraints, more and more blocks from previous designs are reused or third party IP blocks are licensed. However, such blocks are often only poorly documented making adjustments to the blocks a difficult task. This paper presents a technique for automatic feature localization for hardware designs. Our approach helps a developer in understanding a design by localizing parts of the code which implement a certain feature of interest. We evaluate the approach on three open source designs. For those designs, our approach yields a more precise localization of the code implementing the different features than the documentation of the design.
Jan Malburg, Alexander Finder, Görschwin Fey
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.2
2013 Tuning dynamic data flow analysis to support design understanding
abstract
Modern chip designs are getting more and more complex. To fulfill tight time-to-market constraints, third-party blocks and parts from previous designs are reused. However, these are often poorly documented, making it hard for a designer to understand the code. Therefore, automatic approaches are required which extract information about the design and support developers in understanding the design. In this paper we introduce a new dynamic data flow analysis tuned to automate design understanding. We present the use of the approach for feature localization and for understanding the design's data flow. In the evaluation, our analysis improves feature localization by reducing the uncertainty by 41% to 98% compared to a previous approach using coverage metrics.
Jan Malburg, Alexander Finder, Görschwin Fey
DATE2
2013 Debugging HDL designs based on functional equivalences with high-level specifications
abstract
The increasing complexity of circuits and systems is forcing design specifications to software-like programming languages like C. Since the conversion from software to hardware is a difficult task solved manually, bugs are frequently introduced in the HDL design. Sophisticated automated error localization and correction techniques, i.e. debugging, are a challenge. In this paper a new automated method is presented for debugging hardware implementations when a software-like specification in C is given. Based on functional equivalences between software and hardware, error localization and correction are automated. We present experimental results for different types of designs and different types of faults.
Alexander Finder, Jan-Philipp Witte, Görschwin Fey
DDECS1
2012 Automated feature localization for hardware designs using coverage metrics
abstract
Due to the increasing complexity modern System on Chip designs are developed by large design teams. In addition, existing design blocks are re-used such that the knowledge about these parts of the design entirely depends on the quality of the documentation. For a single designer it is almost impossible to have detailed knowledge about all blocks and their interaction.
Jan Malburg, Alexander Finder, Görschwin Fey
DAC2
2011 Latency Analysis for Sequential Circuits
abstract
Verification is a major bottleneck in today's circuit and system design. This includes the tasks of error detection, error localization, and error correction in an implemented design as well as the analysis and avoidance of transient faults. For all those tasks, knowing for how long values of signals influence the system is important. In this paper, we propose a minimal and maximal latency measure for sequential circuits. This measure explains how long a circuit's state and outputs depend on input stimuli. Exact and heuristic algorithms are proposed to determine the measure. Experiments show that the measure provides insight into the behavior of circuit designs.
Alexander Finder, André Sülflow, Görschwin Fey
ETS1
2011 Improving ESOP-Based Synthesis of Reversible Logic Using Evolutionary Algorithms
Rolf Drechsler, Alexander Finder, Robert Wille
EvoApplications (2)2
2010 Evaluating Debugging Algorithms from a Qualitative Perspective
Alexander Finder, Görschwin Fey
FDL1