Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Juliusz Sompolski

dblp:84/9733 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Distributed and cloud data management · 44% Query processing and optimization · 44% Transaction processing and concurrency control · 13%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Query processing and optimization
parallel query processing
0.212016
VectorH: Taking SQL-on-Hadoop to the Next Level · SIGMOD Conference 2016
Distributed and cloud data management › big data systems
SQL-on-Hadoop
0.212016
VectorH: Taking SQL-on-Hadoop to the Next Level · SIGMOD Conference 2016
Transaction processing and concurrency control
update management
0.112016
VectorH: Taking SQL-on-Hadoop to the Next Level · SIGMOD Conference 2016
Cloud and datacenter computing › cluster resource management and scheduling
cluster resource management
0.112016
VectorH: Taking SQL-on-Hadoop to the Next Level · SIGMOD Conference 2016
Cloud and datacenter computing › resource management
workload management
0.112016
VectorH: Taking SQL-on-Hadoop to the Next Level · SIGMOD Conference 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

positional delta trees · 0.5HDFS replication policy · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 VectorH: Taking SQL-on-Hadoop to the Next Level
abstract
Actian Vector in Hadoop (VectorH for short) is a new SQL-on-Hadoop system built on top of the fast Vectorwise analytical database system. VectorH achieves fault tolerance and storage scalability by relying on HDFS, and extends the state-of-the-art in SQL-on-Hadoop systems by instrumenting the HDFS replication policy to optimize read locality. VectorH integrates with YARN for workload management, achieving a high degree of elasticity. Even though HDFS is an append-only filesystem, and VectorH supports (update-averse) ordered tables, trickle updates are possible thanks to Positional Delta Trees (PDTs), a differential update structure that can be queried efficiently. We describe the changes made to single-server Vectorwise to turn it into a Hadoop-based MPP system, encompassing workload management, parallel query optimization and execution, HDFS storage, transaction processing and Spark integration. We evaluate VectorH against HAWQ, Impala, SparkSQL and Hive, showing orders of magnitude better performance.
Andrei Costea, Adrian Ionescu, Bogdan Raducanu, Michal Switakowski, Cristian Bârca, Juliusz Sompolski, Alicja Luszczak, Michal Szafranski, Giel de Nijs, Peter Boncz
SIGMOD Conference6
2011 Vectorization vs. compilation in query execution
abstract
Compiling database queries into executable (sub-) programs provides substantial benefits comparing to traditional interpreted execution. Many of these benefits, such as reduced interpretation overhead, better instruction code locality, and providing opportunities to use SIMD instructions, have previously been provided by redesigning query processors to use a vectorized execution model. In this paper, we try to shed light on the question of how state-of-the-art compilation strategies relate to vectorized execution for analytical database workloads on modern CPUs. For this purpose, we carefully investigate the behavior of vectorized and compiled strategies inside the Ingres VectorWise database system in three use cases: Project, Select and Hash Join. One of the findings is that compilation should always be combined with block-wise query execution. Another contribution is identifying three cases where "loop-compilation" strategies are inferior to vectorized execution. As such, a careful merging of these two strategies is proposed for optimal performance: either by incorporating vectorized execution principles into compiled query plans or using query compilation to create building blocks for vectorized processing.
Juliusz Sompolski, Marcin Zukowski, Peter Boncz
DaMoN1