Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Eduardo M. Barbosa

dblp:84/9790 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 77% Web and social media mining · 23%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems › social recommendation
collaboration recommendation
0.112012
VRRC: web based tool for visualization and recommendation on co-authorship network (abstract only) · SIGMOD Conference 2012
Visualization and visual analytics
graph visualization
0.112012
VRRC: web based tool for visualization and recommendation on co-authorship network (abstract only) · SIGMOD Conference 2012
Web and social media mining
co-authorship networks
0.012012
VRRC: web based tool for visualization and recommendation on co-authorship network (abstract only) · SIGMOD Conference 2012
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 VRRC: web based tool for visualization and recommendation on co-authorship network (abstract only)
abstract
Scientific studies are usually developed by contributions from different researchers. Analyzing such collaborations is often necessary, for example, when evaluating the quality of a research group. Also, identifying new partnership possibilities within a set of researchers is frequently desired, for example, when looking for partners in foreign countries. Both analysis and identification are not easy tasks, and are usually done manually. This work presents VRRC, a new approach for visualizing recommendations of people within a co-authorship network (i.e., a graph in which nodes represent researchers and edges represent their co-authorships). VRRC input is a publication list from which it extracts the co-authorships. VRRC then recommends which relations could be created or intensified based on metrics designed for evaluating co-authorship networks. Finally, VRRC provides brand new ways to visualize not only the final recommendations but also the intermediate interactions within the network, including: a complete representation of the co-authorship network; an overview of the collaborations evolution over time; and the recommendations for each researcher to initiate or intensify cooperation. Some visualizations are interactive, allowing to filter data by time frame and highlighting specific collaborations. The contributions of our work, compared to the state-of-art, can be summarized as follows: (i) VRRC can be applied to any co-authorship network, it provides both net and recommendation visualizations, it is a Web-based tool and it allows easy sharing of the created visualizations (existing tools do not offer all these features together); (ii) VRRC establishes graphical representations to ease the visualization of its results (traditional approaches present the recommendation results through simple lists or charts); and (iii) with VRRC, the user can identify not only new possible collaborations but also existing cooperation that can be intensified (current recommendation approaches only indicate new collaborations). This work was partially supported by CNPq, Brazil.
Eduardo M. Barbosa, Mirella M. Moro, Giseli Rabello Lopes, José Palazzo M. de Oliveira
SIGMOD Conference1