EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Eduardo M. Barbosa
dblp:84/9790
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Recommender systems · 77% Web and social media mining · 23% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommender systems › social recommendation
collaboration recommendation |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | VRRC: web based tool for visualization and recommendation on co-authorship network (abstract only) · SIGMOD Conference 2012 |
Visualization and visual analytics
graph visualization |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | VRRC: web based tool for visualization and recommendation on co-authorship network (abstract only) · SIGMOD Conference 2012 |
Web and social media mining
co-authorship networks |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | VRRC: web based tool for visualization and recommendation on co-authorship network (abstract only) · SIGMOD Conference 2012 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | VRRC: web based tool for visualization and recommendation on co-authorship network (abstract only)abstractScientific studies are usually developed by contributions from different researchers. Analyzing such collaborations is often necessary, for example, when evaluating the quality of a research group. Also, identifying new partnership possibilities within a set of researchers is frequently desired, for example, when looking for partners in foreign countries. Both analysis and identification are not easy tasks, and are usually done manually. This work presents VRRC, a new approach for visualizing recommendations of people within a co-authorship network (i.e., a graph in which nodes represent researchers and edges represent their co-authorships). VRRC input is a publication list from which it extracts the co-authorships. VRRC then recommends which relations could be created or intensified based on metrics designed for evaluating co-authorship networks. Finally, VRRC provides brand new ways to visualize not only the final recommendations but also the intermediate interactions within the network, including: a complete representation of the co-authorship network; an overview of the collaborations evolution over time; and the recommendations for each researcher to initiate or intensify cooperation. Some visualizations are interactive, allowing to filter data by time frame and highlighting specific collaborations. The contributions of our work, compared to the state-of-art, can be summarized as follows: (i) VRRC can be applied to any co-authorship network, it provides both net and recommendation visualizations, it is a Web-based tool and it allows easy sharing of the created visualizations (existing tools do not offer all these features together); (ii) VRRC establishes graphical representations to ease the visualization of its results (traditional approaches present the recommendation results through simple lists or charts); and (iii) with VRRC, the user can identify not only new possible collaborations but also existing cooperation that can be intensified (current recommendation approaches only indicate new collaborations). This work was partially supported by CNPq, Brazil. Eduardo M. Barbosa, Mirella M. Moro, Giseli Rabello Lopes, José Palazzo M. de Oliveira |
SIGMOD Conference | 1 |