Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christopher J. McFarland

dblp:84/9968 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Robot navigation and mapping · 49% Motion planning and robot control · 45% Legged, aerial and field robots · 5%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.422014
Experimental evaluation of adaptive model-based control for underwater vehicles in the presence of unmodeled actuator dynamics · ICRA 2014
Comparative experimental evaluation of a new adaptive identifier for underwater vehicles · ICRA 2013
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › mobile robot navigation › vehicle navigation
underwater vehicle navigation
0.322015
Toward ice-relative navigation of underwater robotic vehicles under moving sea ice: Experimental evaluation in the Arctic sea · ICRA 2015
Experimental evaluation of an inertial navigation system for underwater robotic vehicles · ICRA 2011
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › adaptive control
model-based adaptive control
0.212014
Experimental evaluation of adaptive model-based control for underwater vehicles in the presence of unmodeled actuator dynamics · ICRA 2014
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › state estimation
inertial navigation system
0.112011
Experimental evaluation of an inertial navigation system for underwater robotic vehicles · ICRA 2011
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
state estimation
0.112011
Experimental evaluation of an inertial navigation system for underwater robotic vehicles · ICRA 2011
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
underwater robotics
0.112015
Toward ice-relative navigation of underwater robotic vehicles under moving sea ice: Experimental evaluation in the Arctic sea · ICRA 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

inertial navigation · 0.2acoustic navigation · 0.2proportional-derivative control · 0.2adaptive control · 0.2least squares · 0.2adaptive identification · 0.2gyrocompass · 0.1doppler sonar · 0.1acoustic time-of-flight ranging · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Toward ice-relative navigation of underwater robotic vehicles under moving sea ice: Experimental evaluation in the Arctic sea
abstract
This paper addresses the problem of ice-relative navigation of underwater robotic vehicles for oceanographic missions under moving sea ice. We define the ice-relative navigation problem and report a novel underwater robot vehicle, Nereid-UI, and its navigation system designed for under-ice oceanographic operations in ice-covered seas. The goal of Nereid-UI is to enable deployments in polar ocean regions traditionally considered difficult or impossible to access such as the ice-ocean interface in marginal ice zones, the water column of ice-covered seas, and the water column underlying ice shelves. This paper also reports the navigation results of Nereid-UI's first under-ice sea trials and science operations conducted under moving multi-year sea ice off the ice breaker Polarstern in the Arctic Ocean at 83° N 6° W - about 200 km NE of Greenland.
Christopher J. McFarland, Michael V. Jakuba, Stefano Suman, James C. Kinsey, Louis L. Whitcomb
ICRA1
2014 Experimental evaluation of adaptive model-based control for underwater vehicles in the presence of unmodeled actuator dynamics
abstract
This paper reports a comparative experimental evaluation of proportional derivative and adaptive model-based control for underwater vehicles. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first such evaluation of model-based adaptive tracking control for underwater vehicles during simultaneous dynamic motion in all 6 degrees-of-freedom. This experimental evaluation revealed the presence of unmodeled thruster dynamics arising during reversals of the vehicle's thrusters, and that the unmodeled thruster dynamics can destabilize parameter adaptation. The three major contributions of this paper are: an experimental analysis of how unmodeled thruster dynamics can destabilize parameter adaptation, a two-step adaptive model-based control algorithm which is robust to the thruster modeling errors present, and a comparative experimental evaluation of adaptive model-based control and proportional derivative control for fully-actuated underwater vehicles preforming simultaneous 6 degree-of-freedom trajectory tracking.
Christopher J. McFarland, Louis L. Whitcomb
ICRA1
2013 Comparative experimental evaluation of a new adaptive identifier for underwater vehicles
abstract
This paper reports a novel adaptive identifier for underwater vehicles as well as its local stability proof and comparative experimental evaluation. The adaptive identification algorithm estimates the hydrodynamic mass, quadratic drag, gravitational force, and buoyancy parameters of a second-order rigid-body plant under the influence of actuator forces and torques. Adaptive model identification methods do not require instrumentation of vehicle acceleration as required of other standard methods, such as conventional least squares. Previous adaptive model identification methods have focused on model-based adaptive tracking controllers however these approaches are not applicable when the plant is either uncontrolled, under open-loop control, or using any control law other than a specific adaptive tracking controller; the adaptive identifier reported herein does not require reference trajectory-tracking, and thus is applicable in these commonly occurring cases. An experimental comparison of adaptive identification and conventional least squares parameter identification is reported. The adaptively identified model is shown to be similar to the least squares identified model.
Christopher J. McFarland, Louis L. Whitcomb
ICRA1
2011 Experimental evaluation of an inertial navigation system for underwater robotic vehicles
abstract
This paper reports the results of an in-water laboratory evaluation of the state estimation accuracy of a commercially available inertial navigation system (INS), and the effect of variations in the accuracy and the update rate of INS correction data on the accuracy of the INS state estimate. The navigation accuracy of the INS state estimate is evaluated by comparison with navigation data from a highly accurate navigation system available in our laboratory that employs high-frequency acoustic time-of-flight ranging, precision pressure depth sensing, bottom-lock Doppler sonar, and a true-North-seeking gyrocompass that is integral to the INS.
Giancarlo Troni, Christopher J. McFarland, Kirk A. Nichols, Louis L. Whitcomb
ICRA2