EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Cheng-Yin Wu
dblp:85/10660
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 94% Logic in computer science · 6% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking › symbolic model checking
interpolation-based model checking |
0.4 | 2 | 2014 | A Counterexample-Guided Interpolant Generation Algorithm for SAT-Based Model Checking · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2014 A counterexample-guided interpolant generation algorithm for SAT-based model checking · DAC 2013 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking › symbolic model checking
SAT-based model checking |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | A Counterexample-Guided Interpolant Generation Algorithm for SAT-Based Model Checking · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2014 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
model checking |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | A counterexample-guided interpolant generation algorithm for SAT-based model checking · DAC 2013 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability
SAT-based verification |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | A counterexample-guided interpolant generation algorithm for SAT-based model checking · DAC 2013 |
Logic in computer science
proof theory |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | A Counterexample-Guided Interpolant Generation Algorithm for SAT-Based Model Checking · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.4SAT solving · 0.4interpolation · 0.2interpolant generation · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Adaptive interpolation-based model checkingabstractInterpolation-based model checking (IMC) is an important technique in modern formal verification tools. In essence, it relies on an abstraction and refinement process to derive an adequate image approximation for the reachability analysis. However, previous IMC algorithms only offer fixed degrees of abstraction and thus may fail in the proofs if the abstraction is too coarse- or fine-grained. In this paper, we propose an adaptive interpolation-based model checking algorithm in which the degree of abstraction can be adjusted on demand. That is, during the proof process, we closely monitor the effectiveness of the interpolation-based over-approximated image computation and thus adjust the degree of abstraction for the best performance. The experimental results confirm that our flexible interpolation indeed leads to an adequate degree of abstraction as our IMC algorithm outperforms previous ones in various aspects. Chien-Yu Lai, Cheng-Yin Wu, Chung-Yang Huang |
ASP-DAC | 2 |
| 2014 | A Counterexample-Guided Interpolant Generation Algorithm for SAT-Based Model CheckingabstractInterpolation is an important and distinguished method popularly applied to recent synthesis and verification research topics. Existing approaches generate interpolants by analyzing unsatisfiability (UNSAT) proofs from satisfiable (SAT) solvers. Unfortunately, the interpolant is predestinedly determined by how the UNSAT proof is logged. This particularly weakens the abstraction of interpolation-based model checking procedure. In this paper, a new approach to generate a variety of functionally different interpolants using simulation and SAT solving is proposed. We further seamlessly integrated the novel interpolant generation algorithm into a reinterpreted interpolation-based model checking procedure. Moreover, spurious counterexamples from the model checker further guide the generation of interpolants to refute excessive refinements. As an extra benefit, proof logging is not required for SAT solvers. Experiments show promising results of our interpolation-based model checker NewITP on solving a large set of HWMCC benchmarks. Cheng-Yin Wu, Chi-An Wu, Chien-Yu Lai, Chung-Yang Huang |
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. | 1 |
| 2013 | A counterexample-guided interpolant generation algorithm for SAT-based model checkingabstractInterpolation is an important and distinguished method popularly applied to recent synthesis and verification research topics. Existing approaches generate interpolants by analysing unsatisfiability proofs from SAT solvers. Unfortunately, the interpolant is predestinedly determined by how the unsatisfiability proof is logged. This particularly weakens the abstraction of interpolation-based model checking procedure. In this paper, a new approach to generate a variety of functionally different interpolants using simulation and SAT solving is proposed. We further seamlessly integrated the novel interpolant generation algorithm into the reinterpreted interpolation-based model checking procedure. Moreover, spurious counterexamples from the model checker further guide the generation of interpolants to refute excessive refinements. As an extra benefit, proof logging is not required for SAT solvers. Experiments show promising results of our interpolation-based model checker NewITP on solving a large set of HWMCC benchmarks. Cheng-Yin Wu, Chi-An Wu, Chien-Yu Lai, Chung-Yang Huang |
DAC | 1 |
| 2012 | QuteRTL: Towards an Open Source Framework for RTL Design Synthesis and Verification
Hu-Hsi Yeh, Cheng-Yin Wu, Chung-Yang Huang |
TACAS | 2 |
| 2011 | Property-specific sequential invariant extraction for SAT-based unbounded model checkingabstractIn this paper, we propose a property-specific sequential invariant extraction algorithm to improve the performance of the SAT-based Unbounded Modeling Checkers (UMCs). By analyzing the property-related predicates and their corresponding high-level design constructs such as FSMs and counters, we can quickly identify the sequential invariants that are useful in improving the property proving capabilities. We utilize these sequential invariants to refine the inductive hypothesis in induction-based UMCs, and to improve the accuracy of reachable state approximation in interpolation-based UMCs. The experimental results show that our tool can outperform a state-of-the-art UMC in most cases, especially for the difficult true properties. Hu-Hsi Yeh, Cheng-Yin Wu, Chung-Yang Huang |
ICCAD | 2 |