Delay insensitive asynchronous circuitry provides significant advantages with respect to substrate noise due to localized switching. The differences between the substrate noise from NULL convention logic (NCL) and traditional clocked Boolean logic (CBL) are described and analyzed based on measured results. A test chip fabricated in the TSMC 0.25 μm process shows that a pseudo-random number generator implemented with NCL generates 23 dB less substrate noise compared to the equivalent synchronous design. In a larger scale digital circuit, the substrate noise improvement offered by an asynchronous 8051 processor over its synchronous counterpart was nearly 10 dB. The effect of this substrate noise on an analog circuit was explored with a delta-sigma modulator (DSM) example. The signal-to-noise ratio performance of a second order DSM was not affected by the substrate noise from the NCL 8051 processor while it experiences up to 15 dB degradation when the CBL 8051 processor is clocked near integer multiples of the DSM sampling frequency.

Energy performance requirements are causing designers of next-generation systems to explore approaches to lowest possible power consumption. Subthreshold operation is being examined to stretch low-power circuit designs beyond the normal modes of operation, with the potential for large energy savings. Some of the challenges to be overcome, like 10-100× performance penalties, are being addressed by research into parallelism. However, the uncertainty in timing generated by operating in subthreshold represents a major challenge to overcome. In this paper, first, we will introduce some background information on digital logic subthreshold operation, then provide some background on clockless logic design approaches giving a brief overview of some of the characteristics of the different design styles and focusing on NULL convention logic. Next, we will examine the application of that clockless logic approach to a military system, reviewing the background of the experiment, factors considered in the comparison, and then summarizing the results of the comparisons. Finally, an overview of additional research and development that will be needed to make the technique available to subthreshold designers is presented.