Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Tim Hoheisel

dblp:85/11305 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-0782-6302ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 50% Speech recognition and synthesis · 50%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › nonconvex optimization
difference of convex programming
1.522025
Discrete and Continuous Difference of Submodular Minimization · ICML 2025
Difference of submodular minimization via DC programming · ICML 2023
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization
difference of submodular minimization
1.522025
Discrete and Continuous Difference of Submodular Minimization · ICML 2025
Difference of submodular minimization via DC programming · ICML 2023
Mathematical optimization
submodular optimization
0.912025
Discrete and Continuous Difference of Submodular Minimization · ICML 2025
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization
0.712023
Difference of submodular minimization via DC programming · ICML 2023
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization
0.712023
Difference of submodular minimization via DC programming · ICML 2023
Mathematical optimization › discrete optimization
submodular function minimization
0.712023
Difference of submodular minimization via DC programming · ICML 2023
Image and video processing › image restoration › image deblurring
blind image deblurring
0.512021
Blind Deblurring of Barcodes via Kullback-Leibler Divergence · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021
Image and video processing › image restoration
denoising
0.512021
Blind Deblurring of Barcodes via Kullback-Leibler Divergence · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
feature selection
0.212023
Difference of submodular minimization via DC programming · ICML 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

DC algorithm · 2.2convex-concave procedure · 1.3discretization · 0.9kullback-leibler divergence · 0.5barcode symbology constraints · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Discrete and Continuous Difference of Submodular Minimization
abstract
Submodular functions, defined on continuous or discrete domains, arise in numerous applications. We study the minimization of the difference of submodular (DS) functions, over both domains, extending prior work restricted to set functions. We show that all functions on discrete domains and all smooth functions on continuous domains are DS. For discrete domains, we observe that DS minimization is equivalent to minimizing the difference of two convex (DC) functions, as in the set function case. We propose a novel variant of the DC Algorithm (DCA) and apply it to the resulting DC Program, obtaining comparable theoretical guarantees as in the set function case. The algorithm can be applied to continuous domains via discretization. Experiments demonstrate that our method outperforms baselines in integer compressive sensing and integer least squares.
George Orfanides, Tim Hoheisel, Marwa El Halabi
ICML2
2023 Difference of submodular minimization via DC programming
abstract
Minimizing the difference of two submodular (DS) functions is a problem that naturally occurs in various machine learning problems. Although it is well known that a DS problem can be equivalently formulated as the minimization of the difference of two convex (DC) functions, existing algorithms do not fully exploit this connection. A classical algorithm for DC problems is called the DC algorithm (DCA). We introduce variants of DCA and its complete form (CDCA) that we apply to the DC program corresponding to DS minimization. We extend existing convergence properties of DCA, and connect them to convergence properties on the DS problem. Our results on DCA match the theoretical guarantees satisfied by existing DS algorithms, while providing a more complete characterization of convergence properties. In the case of CDCA, we obtain a stronger local minimality guarantee. Our numerical results show that our proposed algorithms outperform existing baselines on two applications: speech corpus selection and feature selection.
Marwa El Halabi, George Orfanides, Tim Hoheisel
ICML3
2021 Blind Deblurring of Barcodes via Kullback-Leibler Divergence
abstract
Barcode encoding schemes impose symbolic constraints which fix certain segments of the image. We present, implement, and assess a method for blind deblurring and denoising based entirely on Kullback-Leibler divergence. The method is designed to incorporate and exploit the full strength of barcode symbologies. Via both standard barcode reading software and smartphone apps, we demonstrate the remarkable ability of our method to blindly recover simulated images of highly blurred and noisy barcodes. As proof of concept, we present one application on a real-life out of focus camera image.
Gabriel Rioux, Christopher Scarvelis, Rustum Choksi, Tim Hoheisel, Pierre Maréchal
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.4
2020 A principled approach for generating adversarial images under non-smooth dissimilarity metrics
abstract
Deep neural networks perform well on real world data but are prone to adversarial perturbations: small changes in the input easily lead to misclassification. In this work, we propose an attack methodology not only for cases where the perturbations are measured by Lp norms, but in fact any adversarial dissimilarity metric with a closed proximal form. This includes, but is not limited to, L1, L2, and L-infinity perturbations; the L0 counting "norm" (i.e. true sparseness); and the total variation seminorm, which is a (Lp) convolutional dissimilarity measuring local pixel changes. Our approach is a natural extension of a recent adversarial attack method, and eliminates the differentiability requirement of the metric. We demonstrate our algorithm, ProxLogBarrier, on the MNIST, CIFAR10, and ImageNet-1k datasets. We consider undefended and defended models, and show that our algorithm easily transfers to various datasets. We observe that ProxLogBarrier outperforms a host of modern adversarial attacks specialized for the L0 case. Moreover, by altering images in the total variation seminorm, we shed light on a new class of perturbations that exploit neighboring pixel information.
Aram-Alexandre Pooladian, Chris Finlay, Tim Hoheisel, Adam M. Oberman
AISTATS3