EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tim Hoheisel
dblp:85/11305
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-0782-6302ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 50% Speech recognition and synthesis · 50% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › nonconvex optimization
difference of convex programming |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Discrete and Continuous Difference of Submodular Minimization · ICML 2025 Difference of submodular minimization via DC programming · ICML 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization
difference of submodular minimization |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Discrete and Continuous Difference of Submodular Minimization · ICML 2025 Difference of submodular minimization via DC programming · ICML 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
submodular optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Discrete and Continuous Difference of Submodular Minimization · ICML 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Difference of submodular minimization via DC programming · ICML 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Difference of submodular minimization via DC programming · ICML 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › discrete optimization
submodular function minimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Difference of submodular minimization via DC programming · ICML 2023 |
Image and video processing › image restoration › image deblurring
blind image deblurring |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Blind Deblurring of Barcodes via Kullback-Leibler Divergence · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
denoising |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Blind Deblurring of Barcodes via Kullback-Leibler Divergence · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
feature selection |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Difference of submodular minimization via DC programming · ICML 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
DC algorithm · 2.2convex-concave procedure · 1.3discretization · 0.9kullback-leibler divergence · 0.5barcode symbology constraints · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Discrete and Continuous Difference of Submodular MinimizationabstractSubmodular functions, defined on continuous or discrete domains, arise in numerous applications. We study the minimization of the difference of submodular (DS) functions, over both domains, extending prior work restricted to set functions. We show that all functions on discrete domains and all smooth functions on continuous domains are DS. For discrete domains, we observe that DS minimization is equivalent to minimizing the difference of two convex (DC) functions, as in the set function case. We propose a novel variant of the DC Algorithm (DCA) and apply it to the resulting DC Program, obtaining comparable theoretical guarantees as in the set function case. The algorithm can be applied to continuous domains via discretization. Experiments demonstrate that our method outperforms baselines in integer compressive sensing and integer least squares. George Orfanides, Tim Hoheisel, Marwa El Halabi |
ICML | 2 |
| 2023 | Difference of submodular minimization via DC programmingabstractMinimizing the difference of two submodular (DS) functions is a problem that naturally occurs in various machine learning problems. Although it is well known that a DS problem can be equivalently formulated as the minimization of the difference of two convex (DC) functions, existing algorithms do not fully exploit this connection. A classical algorithm for DC problems is called the DC algorithm (DCA). We introduce variants of DCA and its complete form (CDCA) that we apply to the DC program corresponding to DS minimization. We extend existing convergence properties of DCA, and connect them to convergence properties on the DS problem. Our results on DCA match the theoretical guarantees satisfied by existing DS algorithms, while providing a more complete characterization of convergence properties. In the case of CDCA, we obtain a stronger local minimality guarantee. Our numerical results show that our proposed algorithms outperform existing baselines on two applications: speech corpus selection and feature selection. Marwa El Halabi, George Orfanides, Tim Hoheisel |
ICML | 3 |
| 2021 | Blind Deblurring of Barcodes via Kullback-Leibler DivergenceabstractBarcode encoding schemes impose symbolic constraints which fix certain segments of the image. We present, implement, and assess a method for blind deblurring and denoising based entirely on Kullback-Leibler divergence. The method is designed to incorporate and exploit the full strength of barcode symbologies. Via both standard barcode reading software and smartphone apps, we demonstrate the remarkable ability of our method to blindly recover simulated images of highly blurred and noisy barcodes. As proof of concept, we present one application on a real-life out of focus camera image. Gabriel Rioux, Christopher Scarvelis, Rustum Choksi, Tim Hoheisel, Pierre Maréchal |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 4 |
| 2020 | A principled approach for generating adversarial images under non-smooth dissimilarity metricsabstractDeep neural networks perform well on real world data but are prone to adversarial perturbations: small changes in the input easily lead to misclassification. In this work, we propose an attack methodology not only for cases where the perturbations are measured by Lp norms, but in fact any adversarial dissimilarity metric with a closed proximal form. This includes, but is not limited to, L1, L2, and L-infinity perturbations; the L0 counting "norm" (i.e. true sparseness); and the total variation seminorm, which is a (Lp) convolutional dissimilarity measuring local pixel changes. Our approach is a natural extension of a recent adversarial attack method, and eliminates the differentiability requirement of the metric. We demonstrate our algorithm, ProxLogBarrier, on the MNIST, CIFAR10, and ImageNet-1k datasets. We consider undefended and defended models, and show that our algorithm easily transfers to various datasets. We observe that ProxLogBarrier outperforms a host of modern adversarial attacks specialized for the L0 case. Moreover, by altering images in the total variation seminorm, we shed light on a new class of perturbations that exploit neighboring pixel information. Aram-Alexandre Pooladian, Chris Finlay, Tim Hoheisel, Adam M. Oberman |
AISTATS | 3 |