Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Botond Cseke
dblp:85/1418
· DBLP profile ↗
12ranked-venue papers
4as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 4 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 36% Motion planning and robot control · 24% Generative modeling · 14% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 24 heaviest of 25, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Latent Matters: Learning Deep State-Space Models · NeurIPS 2021 Learning Hierarchical Priors in VAEs · NeurIPS 2019 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot learning
movement primitives |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Constrained Probabilistic Movement Primitives for Robot Trajectory Adaptation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2022 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot learning › movement primitives
probabilistic movement primitives |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Constrained Probabilistic Movement Primitives for Robot Trajectory Adaptation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2022 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Constrained Probabilistic Movement Primitives for Robot Trajectory Adaptation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2022 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series analysis
bayesian filtering and smoothing |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Latent Matters: Learning Deep State-Space Models · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
deep state space model |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Latent Matters: Learning Deep State-Space Models · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian filtering
kalman filtering |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Latent Matters: Learning Deep State-Space Models · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models › bayesian deep learning
bayesian neural networks |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Continual Learning with Bayesian Neural Networks for Non-Stationary Data · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Continual Learning with Bayesian Neural Networks for Non-Stationary Data · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › prior modeling
hierarchical prior |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Learning Hierarchical Priors in VAEs · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
latent representation learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Learning Hierarchical Priors in VAEs · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › divergence minimization
f-divergence minimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | f-GAN: Training Generative Neural Samplers using Variational Divergence Minimization · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | f-GAN: Training Generative Neural Samplers using Variational Divergence Minimization · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › divergence minimization
variational divergence minimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | f-GAN: Training Generative Neural Samplers using Variational Divergence Minimization · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference |
0.2 | 2 | 2013 | Approximate inference in latent Gaussian-Markov models from continuous time observations · NIPS 2013 Bayesian Source Localization with the Multivariate Laplace Prior · NIPS 2009 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
expectation propagation |
0.2 | 2 | 2013 | Approximate inference in latent Gaussian-Markov models from continuous time observations · NIPS 2013 Bayesian Source Localization with the Multivariate Laplace Prior · NIPS 2009 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
constrained optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Constrained Probabilistic Movement Primitives for Robot Trajectory Adaptation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2022 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › trajectory planning
trajectory adaptation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Constrained Probabilistic Movement Primitives for Robot Trajectory Adaptation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Approximate inference in latent Gaussian-Markov models from continuous time observations · NIPS 2013 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Approximate inference in latent Gaussian-Markov models from continuous time observations · NIPS 2013 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
latent gaussian model |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Approximate Marginals in Latent Gaussian Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Bayesian Source Localization with the Multivariate Laplace Prior · NIPS 2009 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
sparse bayesian learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Bayesian Source Localization with the Multivariate Laplace Prior · NIPS 2009 |
Medical and health informatics › neuroimaging
neuroimaging analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Bayesian Source Localization with the Multivariate Laplace Prior · NIPS 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
constrained optimization · 1.5kullback-leibler divergence · 0.6amortised variational inference · 0.5graph-based interpolation · 0.4variational divergence estimation · 0.2f-divergence · 0.2multivariate laplace prior · 0.2expectation propagation · 0.2kalman-bucy smoothing · 0.2hybrid fixed point iteration · 0.2scale mixture representation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Fast Preserving Local Distances and Topology in Auto-encoders
Nutan Chen, Patrick van der Smagt, Botond Cseke |
ICONIP (2) | 3 |
| 2022 | Constrained Probabilistic Movement Primitives for Robot Trajectory AdaptationabstractPlacing robotsoutside controlled conditions requires versatile movement representations that allow robots to learn new tasks and adapt them to environmental changes. The introduction of obstacles or the placement of additional robots in the workspace and the modification of the joint range due to faults or range-of-motion constraints are typical cases, where the adaptation capabilities play a key role for safely performing the robot’s task. Probabilistic movement primitives (ProMPs) have been proposed for representing adaptable movement skills, which are modeled as Gaussian distributions over trajectories. These are analytically tractable and can be learned from a small number of demonstrations. However, both the original ProMP formulation and the subsequent approaches only provide solutions to specific movement adaptation problems, e.g., obstacle avoidance, and a generic, unifying, probabilistic approach to adaptation is missing. In this article, we develop a generic probabilistic framework for adapting ProMPs. We unify previous adaptation techniques, for example, various types of obstacle avoidance, via-points, and mutual avoidance, in one single framework and combine them to solve complex robotic problems. Additionally, we derive novel adaptation techniques such as temporally unbound via-points and mutual avoidance. We formulate adaptation as a constrained optimization problem, where we minimize the Kullback–Leibler divergence between the adapted distribution and the distribution of the original primitive,while we constrain the probability mass associated with undesired trajectories to be low. We demonstrate our approach on several adaptation problems on simulated planar robot arms and seven-degree-of-freedom Franka Emika robots in a dual-robot-arm setting. Felix Frank, Alexandros Paraschos, Patrick van der Smagt, Botond Cseke |
IEEE Trans. Robotics | 4 |
| 2021 | Latent Matters: Learning Deep State-Space ModelsabstractDeep state-space models (DSSMs) enable temporal predictions by learning the underlying dynamics of observed sequence data. They are often trained by maximising the evidence lower bound. However, as we show, this does not ensure the model actually learns the underlying dynamics. We therefore propose a constrained optimisation framework as a general approach for training DSSMs. Building upon this, we introduce the extended Kalman VAE (EKVAE), which combines amortised variational inference with classic Bayesian filtering/smoothing to model dynamics more accurately than RNN-based DSSMs. Our results show that the constrained optimisation framework significantly improves system identification and prediction accuracy on the example of established state-of-the-art DSSMs. The EKVAE outperforms previous models w.r.t. prediction accuracy, achieves remarkable results in identifying dynamical systems, and can furthermore successfully learn state-space representations where static and dynamic features are disentangled. Alexej Klushyn, Richard Kurle, Maximilian Soelch 0001, Botond Cseke, Patrick van der Smagt |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2020 | Continual Learning with Bayesian Neural Networks for Non-Stationary Data
Richard Kurle, Botond Cseke, Alexej Klushyn, Patrick van der Smagt, Stephan Günnemann |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2019 | Increasing the Generalisaton Capacity of Conditional VAEs
Alexej Klushyn, Nutan Chen, Botond Cseke, Justin Bayer, Patrick van der Smagt |
ICANN (2) | 3 |
| 2019 | Learning Hierarchical Priors in VAEsabstractWe propose to learn a hierarchical prior in the context of variational autoencoders to avoid the over-regularisation resulting from a standard normal prior distribution. To incentivise an informative latent representation of the data, we formulate the learning problem as a constrained optimisation problem by extending the Taming VAEs framework to two-level hierarchical models. We introduce a graph-based interpolation method, which shows that the topology of the learned latent representation corresponds to the topology of the data manifold---and present several examples, where desired properties of latent representation such as smoothness and simple explanatory factors are learned by the prior. Alexej Klushyn, Nutan Chen, Richard Kurle, Botond Cseke, Patrick van der Smagt |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2016 | f-GAN: Training Generative Neural Samplers using Variational Divergence MinimizationabstractGenerative neural networks are probabilistic models that implement sampling using feedforward neural networks: they take a random input vector and produce a sample from a probability distribution defined by the network weights. These models are expressive and allow efficient computation of samples and derivatives, but cannot be used for computing likelihoods or for marginalization. The generative-adversarial training method allows to train such models through the use of an auxiliary discriminative neural network. We show that the generative-adversarial approach is a special case of an existing more general variational divergence estimation approach. We show that any $f$-divergence can be used for training generative neural networks. We discuss the benefits of various choices of divergence functions on training complexity and the quality of the obtained generative models. Sebastian Nowozin, Botond Cseke, Ryota Tomioka |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2013 | Approximate inference in latent Gaussian-Markov models from continuous time observationsabstractWe propose an approximate inference algorithm for continuous time Gaussian-Markov process models with both discrete and continuous time likelihoods. We show that the continuous time limit of the expectation propagation algorithm exists and results in a hybrid fixed point iteration consisting of (1) expectation propagation updates for the discrete time terms and (2) variational updates for the continuous time term. We introduce corrections methods that improve on the marginals of the approximation. This approach extends the classical Kalman-Bucy smoothing procedure to non-Gaussian observations, enabling continuous-time inference in a variety of models, including spiking neuronal models (state-space models with point process observations) and box likelihood models. Experimental results on real and simulated data demonstrate high distributional accuracy and significant computational savings compared to discrete-time approaches in a neural application. Botond Cseke, Manfred Opper, Guido Sanguinetti |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2011 | Properties of Bethe Free Energies and Message Passing in Gaussian ModelsabstractWe address the problem of computing approximate marginals in Gaussian probabilistic models by using mean field and fractional Bethe approximations. We define the Gaussian fractional Bethe free energy in terms of the moment parameters of the approximate marginals, derive a lower and an upper bound on the fractional Bethe free energy and establish a necessary condition for the lower bound to be bounded from below. It turns out that the condition is identical to the pairwise normalizability condition, which is known to be a sufficient condition for the convergence of the message passing algorithm. We show that stable fixed points of the Gaussian message passing algorithm are local minima of the Gaussian Bethe free energy. By a counterexample, we disprove the conjecture stating that the unboundedness of the free energy implies the divergence of the message passing algorithm. Botond Cseke, Tom Heskes |
J. Artif. Intell. Res. | 1 |
| 2011 | Approximate Marginals in Latent Gaussian Models
Botond Cseke, Tom Heskes |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2009 | Bayesian Source Localization with the Multivariate Laplace PriorabstractWe introduce a novel multivariate Laplace (MVL) distribution as a sparsity promoting prior for Bayesian source localization that allows the specification of constraints between and within sources. We represent the MVL distribution as a scale mixture that induces a coupling between source variances instead of their means. Approximation of the posterior marginals using expectation propagation is shown to be very efficient due to properties of the scale mixture representation. The computational bottleneck amounts to computing the diagonal elements of a sparse matrix inverse. Our approach is illustrated using a mismatch negativity paradigm for which MEG data and a structural MRI have been acquired. We show that spatial coupling leads to sources which are active over larger cortical areas as compared with an uncoupled prior. Marcel van Gerven, Botond Cseke, Robert Oostenveld, Tom Heskes |
NIPS | 2 |
| 2008 | Bounds on the Bethe Free Energy for Gaussian Networks
Botond Cseke, Tom Heskes |
UAI | 1 |