Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Denis Golovnya

dblp:85/1923 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data stream processing · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 50% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data stream processing
out-of-order stream processing
0.222009
Supporting a spectrum of out-of-order event processing technologies: from aggressive to conservative methodologies · SIGMOD Conference 2009
Sequence Pattern Query Processing over Out-of-Order Event Streams · ICDE 2009
Data stream processing
complex event processing
0.112009
Sequence Pattern Query Processing over Out-of-Order Event Streams · ICDE 2009
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
error compensation
0.012009
Sequence Pattern Query Processing over Out-of-Order Event Streams · ICDE 2009
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.012009
Sequence Pattern Query Processing over Out-of-Order Event Streams · ICDE 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

partial order guarantee model · 0.2conservative strategy · 0.1aggressive strategy · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Sequence Pattern Query Processing over Out-of-Order Event Streams
abstract
Complex event processing has become increasingly important in modern applications, ranging from RFID tracking for supply chain management to real-time intrusion detection. A key aspect of complex event processing is to extract patterns from event streams to make informed decisions in real-time. However, network latencies and machine failures may cause events to arrive out-of-order at the event processing engine. State-of-the-art event stream processing technology experiences significant challenges when faced with out-of-order data arrival including output blocking, huge system latencies, memory resource overflow, and incorrect result generation. To address these problems, we propose two alternate solutions: aggressive and conservative strategies respectively to process sequence pattern queries on out-of-order event streams. The aggressive strategy produces maximal output under the optimistic assumption that out-of-order event arrival is rare. In contrast, to tackle the unexpected occurrence of an out-of-order event and with it any premature erroneous result generation, appropriate error compensation methods are designed for the aggressive strategy. The conservative method works under the assumption that out-of-order data may be common, and thus produces output only when its correctness can be guaranteed. A partial order guarantee (POG) model is proposed under which such correctness can be guaranteed. For robustness under spiky workloads, both strategies are supplemented with persistent storage support and customized access policies. Our experimental study evaluates the robustness of each method, and compares their respective scope of applicability with state-of-art methods.
Mo Liu 0001, Ming Li 0008, Denis Golovnya, Elke A. Rundensteiner, Kajal T. Claypool
ICDE3
2009 Supporting a spectrum of out-of-order event processing technologies: from aggressive to conservative methodologies
abstract
This demonstration presents a complex event processing system which focuses on out-of-order handling. State-of-the-art event stream processing technology experiences significant challenges when faced with out-of-order data arrival including huge system latencies, missing results, and incorrect result generation. We propose two out-of-order handling techniques, conservative and aggressive strategies. We will show the efficiency of our techniques and how they can satisfy various QoS requirements of different applications.
Mingzhu Wei, Mo Liu 0001, Ming Li 0008, Denis Golovnya, Elke A. Rundensteiner, Kajal T. Claypool
SIGMOD Conference4