Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Seok Bae Jang

dblp:85/2413 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › temporal information extraction
temporal annotation
0.112005
Automating Temporal Annotation with TARSQI · ACL 2005
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
temporal information extraction
0.112005
Automating Temporal Annotation with TARSQI · ACL 2005
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 Automating Temporal Annotation with TARSQI
Marc Verhagen, Inderjeet Mani, Roser Saurí, Jessica Littman, Robert Knippen, Seok Bae Jang, Anna Rumshisky, John Phillips, James Pustejovsky
ACL6
2005 Why Is Zero Marking Important in Korean?
Sun-Hee Lee, Donna K. Byron, Seok Bae Jang
IJCNLP3
2004 Automatic TIMEX2 tagging of Korean news
abstract
This article reports on a temporal tagger for Korean based on a Korean extension of the TIDES TIMEX2 guidelines. The extension, which primarily addresses the idiosyncrasies of Korean morphology, shows high inter-annotator reliability (0.893 F-measure for tag extent) when applied to a corpus of Korean newspaper articles. A machine-learning approach based on rote learning from a human-edited, automatically-derived dictionary of temporal expressions is compared with a second approach that adds manual patterns, and a third onethat tries to learn the patterns. Results for the first two are promising (0.87 F-measure for tag extent). Overall, the article shows that rote learning approaches can be very useful when language-specific features such as morphology are taken into account.
Seok Bae Jang, Jennifer Baldwin, Inderjeet Mani
ACM Trans. Asian Lang. Inf. Process.1