Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bibhuti B. Bhattacharya

dblp:85/2477 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1992
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 77% Empirical software engineering · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software maintenance and evolution › software quality assurance
software quality prediction
0.011992
Predictive Modeling Techniques of Software Quality from Software Measures · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1992
Empirical software engineering › software metrics
software complexity metrics
0.011992
Predictive Modeling Techniques of Software Quality from Software Measures · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1992

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

robust regression · 0.0least squares · 0.0least absolute value estimation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1992 Predictive Modeling Techniques of Software Quality from Software Measures
abstract
The objective in the construction of models of software quality is to use measures that may be obtained relatively early in the software development life cycle to provide reasonable initial estimates of the quality of an evolving software system. Measures of software quality and software complexity to be used in this modeling process exhibit systematic departures of the normality assumptions of regression modeling. Two new estimation procedures are introduced, and their performances in the modeling of software quality from software complexity in terms of the predictive quality and the quality of fit are compared with those of the more traditional least squares and least absolute value estimation techniques. The two new estimation techniques did produce regression models with better quality of fit and predictive quality when applied to data obtained from two software development projects.>
Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar, John C. Munson, Bibhuti B. Bhattacharya, Gary D. Richardson
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.3